ATL: FLORENCE - Post-Tropical - Discussion
Moderator: S2k Moderators
- Extratropical94
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 3538
- Age: 30
- Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2010 6:36 am
- Location: Hamburg, Germany
- Contact:
Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Hurricane - Discussion
Center splash dropsonde measures 944 mb with 9 knots, so the pressure is 943-944 mb
1 likes
54° 11' 59'' N, 9° 9' 20'' E
Boomer Sooner!
Go Broncos! Go Cards! Go Niners!
- Daniel
Boomer Sooner!
Go Broncos! Go Cards! Go Niners!
- Daniel
-
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 34067
- Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
- Location: Deep South, for the first time!
Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Hurricane - Discussion
Given the wind data, I would go with an intensity of 110 kt. Looks like it didn't strengthen despite satellite looking better.
2 likes
- Bocadude85
- Category 5
- Posts: 2990
- Age: 38
- Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 2:20 pm
- Location: Honolulu,Hi
Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Hurricane - Discussion
Blown Away wrote:https://i.imgur.com/3DOQVZo.jpg
Florence does love to go south of the forecast track doesn’t she, I’m sure it’s just a slight wobble however
0 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 4966
- Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2012 10:43 am
Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Hurricane - Discussion
It seems that wind field has expanded greatly while the maximum windspeed is reduced. Likely was stronger during daytime today when the eye temp was near 20C. Too bad we didn't have recon at that time.
0 likes
- Extratropical94
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 3538
- Age: 30
- Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2010 6:36 am
- Location: Hamburg, Germany
- Contact:
Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Hurricane - Discussion
Also, there is almost no rain in the NE eyewall. Highest rain rates measured are 2mm/hr.
0 likes
54° 11' 59'' N, 9° 9' 20'' E
Boomer Sooner!
Go Broncos! Go Cards! Go Niners!
- Daniel
Boomer Sooner!
Go Broncos! Go Cards! Go Niners!
- Daniel
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 9303
- Age: 39
- Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2017 1:51 am
Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Hurricane - Discussion
Extratropical94 wrote:Also, there is almost no rain in the NE eyewall. Highest rain rates measured are 2mm/hr.
Something is fishy. Project stormfiery 2 is killing the storm as speak.

0 likes
-
- Category 1
- Posts: 455
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2018 3:23 pm
Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Hurricane - Discussion
Gotta be honest I expected this thing to take a run at cat 5 tonight. Very surprised by the wind speed.
0 likes
- tarheelprogrammer
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 1793
- Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2016 9:25 pm
- Location: Raleigh, NC area (Garner, NC)
Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Hurricane - Discussion
Hopefully it keeps under performing. Is there anything in its path to keep beating this thing up?
1 likes
My posts are not official forecasts. They are just my opinion and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
- FLeastcoast
- Tropical Depression
- Posts: 84
- Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2017 2:19 am
- Location: NE Florida
Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Hurricane - Discussion
Extratropical94 wrote:Also, there is almost no rain in the NE eyewall. Highest rain rates measured are 2mm/hr.
Isn't that the side that usually has the worst rain?
0 likes
Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Hurricane - Discussion
@EricBlake12
Eric Blake Retweeted Philippe Papin
Eyewall replacement cycles- The bane of the TC intensity forecaster. However whatever you trade in the maximum winds, it could be worse because the #hurricane typically grows in size after that. #Florence
https://twitter.com/EricBlake12/status/1039686070273757185
Eric Blake Retweeted Philippe Papin
Eyewall replacement cycles- The bane of the TC intensity forecaster. However whatever you trade in the maximum winds, it could be worse because the #hurricane typically grows in size after that. #Florence
https://twitter.com/EricBlake12/status/1039686070273757185
0 likes
Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Hurricane - Discussion
Can dry air ingestion initiate an ERC?
1 likes
The above post is not official and should not be used as such. It is the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is not endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
- Hypercane_Kyle
- Category 5
- Posts: 3377
- Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2015 7:58 pm
- Location: Cape Canaveral, FL
Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Hurricane - Discussion
tarheelprogrammer wrote:Hopefully it keeps under performing. Is there anything in its path to keep beating this thing up?
Not really, at least in the short term. Some slight mid-level shear right now that's probably causing a little dry air to wrap into the core associated with a dissipating low-level trough off the states, however that will lessen and tomorrow will be prime intensification. Recon continues to support a Cat 4.
0 likes
My posts are my own personal opinion, defer to the National Hurricane Center (NHC) and other NOAA products for decision making during hurricane season.
- Meteorcane
- Category 2
- Posts: 559
- Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2011 6:49 am
- Location: North Platte Nebraska
Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Hurricane - Discussion
Extratropical94 wrote:Also, there is almost no rain in the NE eyewall. Highest rain rates measured are 2mm/hr.
Although I admittedly am not particularly familiar with the SFMR biases w.r.t rain/rate the lower rainrates (which seem to also correlate with warmer cloud tops and warmer MW brightness temps) would seem to at least partially explain the larger differences between flight-lvl winds and estimated sfc.winds in the NE eyewall.
1 likes
- Hypercane_Kyle
- Category 5
- Posts: 3377
- Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2015 7:58 pm
- Location: Cape Canaveral, FL
Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Hurricane - Discussion
CrazyC83 wrote:Given the wind data, I would go with an intensity of 110 kt. Looks like it didn't strengthen despite satellite looking better.
NHC will probably want to be consistent and give the storm the benefit of the doubt that the recon might not have sampled the absolute strongest winds.
0 likes
My posts are my own personal opinion, defer to the National Hurricane Center (NHC) and other NOAA products for decision making during hurricane season.
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 9303
- Age: 39
- Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2017 1:51 am
Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Hurricane - Discussion
Hammy wrote:Can dry air ingestion initiate an ERC?
Yes,
Within my years of watching these I can clearly say without a doubt that dry air causes a unlimited number of these.
Ike 2008
Rita 2005
Frances 2004
For a few examples.
0 likes
Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Hurricane - Discussion
Hypercane_Kyle wrote:tarheelprogrammer wrote:Hopefully it keeps under performing. Is there anything in its path to keep beating this thing up?
Not really, at least in the short term. Some slight mid-level shear right now that's probably causing a little dry air to wrap into the core associated with a dissipating low-level trough off the states, however that will lessen and tomorrow will be prime intensification. Recon continues to support a Cat 4.
Not that pass

0 likes
- Hypercane_Kyle
- Category 5
- Posts: 3377
- Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2015 7:58 pm
- Location: Cape Canaveral, FL
Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Hurricane - Discussion
I recall Irma last year going through multiple EWRCs in a 24-36 hour period, it's just that Irma was such a monster that it maintained a ridiculous intensity throughout the process.
... which is Cat 4 intensity.
wx98 wrote:Hypercane_Kyle wrote:tarheelprogrammer wrote:Hopefully it keeps under performing. Is there anything in its path to keep beating this thing up?
Not really, at least in the short term. Some slight mid-level shear right now that's probably causing a little dry air to wrap into the core associated with a dissipating low-level trough off the states, however that will lessen and tomorrow will be prime intensification. Recon continues to support a Cat 4.
Not that passSFMRs only as high as 105 kt and the reduction from FL only yields about 113 kt.
... which is Cat 4 intensity.
1 likes
My posts are my own personal opinion, defer to the National Hurricane Center (NHC) and other NOAA products for decision making during hurricane season.
Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Hurricane - Discussion
With a pressure that low if the max winds have come down the windfield has likely expanded so pick your poison. One way or another there's a price to be paid. I would only take comfort if recon showed a persistent increase in pressure.
1 likes
Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Hurricane - Discussion
drezee wrote:Windfield has expanded though...
Do you all realize that recon is showing 80 miles of cat2 flight level winds!!! That is a huge wow from the EWRC...not good for storm surge
1 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests