I'm kind of rooting for "Francie" as a replacement for Florence but it may not have a chance.
![Razz :P](./images/smilies/icon_razz.gif)
Moderator: S2k Moderators
AnnularCane wrote:I remember Frances was originally going to be taken off the list after 2004 at the request of France, so do you think they'll ever use a "Franc-" name again?
I'm kind of rooting for "Francie" as a replacement for Florence but it may not have a chance.
GSBHurricane wrote:Nate had a very understandable case from Costa for its retirement. According to their president, it caused the biggest crisis in Costa Rican history and the numbers support it (at least the worst since Cesar of 1996). Granted, I might not have voted for its retirement myself since Cesar killed more people in the country and caused more damage to Costa Rica than Nate when adjusted for GDP. Nevertheless I can understand why they would vote for it.
Now, onto Florence. It has a high chance for retirement but I don’t think it’s a lock. It turns out that the US didn’t request Matthew’s retirement, with $10 billion in damage and 49 people dead roughly where the worst of Florence hit (yet they requested Lili of 2002 and Joaquin a few years back). Instead it was Cuba and Haiti that asked for its retirement. This, along with Tomas in 2010 and possibly Felix and Noel Rica in 2007, shows that more than one country can ask for a name’s retirement if they feel it’s necessary. It’s possible the US didn’t see Matthew as bad for the Carolinas as say Hugo or Floyd or even Matthew’s Cuban and Haitian impacts. So far, Florence has killed about 25 people and it looks like it’ll have similar damage figures to Matthew ($10 billion or so, maybe up to $15 billion). If Matthew is any indication, Florence might not be a goner after all.
CrazyC83 wrote:HurricaneRyan wrote:Lane is the only storm in the EPAC that could possibly have a case, since Hawaii doesn't get as many threats as mainland US. It was the second highest rainfall total after Harvey. But other than that I didn't hear much on damage from it.
It wasn't that bad from a damage perspective from what I can tell. Iselle probably did more damage than Lane, as the heavy rain was concentrated in remote areas.
CrazyC83 wrote:GSBHurricane wrote:Nate had a very understandable case from Costa for its retirement. According to their president, it caused the biggest crisis in Costa Rican history and the numbers support it (at least the worst since Cesar of 1996). Granted, I might not have voted for its retirement myself since Cesar killed more people in the country and caused more damage to Costa Rica than Nate when adjusted for GDP. Nevertheless I can understand why they would vote for it.
Now, onto Florence. It has a high chance for retirement but I don’t think it’s a lock. It turns out that the US didn’t request Matthew’s retirement, with $10 billion in damage and 49 people dead roughly where the worst of Florence hit (yet they requested Lili of 2002 and Joaquin a few years back). Instead it was Cuba and Haiti that asked for its retirement. This, along with Tomas in 2010 and possibly Felix and Noel Rica in 2007, shows that more than one country can ask for a name’s retirement if they feel it’s necessary. It’s possible the US didn’t see Matthew as bad for the Carolinas as say Hugo or Floyd or even Matthew’s Cuban and Haitian impacts. So far, Florence has killed about 25 people and it looks like it’ll have similar damage figures to Matthew ($10 billion or so, maybe up to $15 billion). If Matthew is any indication, Florence might not be a goner after all.
All the 2007 retirements came from France.
BadLarry95 wrote:So far:
Alberto 5%
Beryl 0%
Chris 0%
Debby 0%
Ernesto 0%
Florence 100% (see ya Flo)
Gordon 2%
Helene 10%
Isaac 0%
Joyce 0%
Kirk
Leslie
Michael
Nadine
Oscar
Patty
Rafael
Sara
Tony
Valerie
William
Ubuntwo wrote:Moody's Analytics has Florence's damage from $38 to $50 billion, and deaths ≥45. It's a lock despite what some are saying.
CrazyC83 wrote:Looks like we will be looking for a new M name for the third straight year.
Torino wrote:CrazyC83 wrote:Looks like we will be looking for a new M name for the third straight year.
M is the new I. That should leave Mindy and Marco as the only two original M names.
We had 4 retired I storms from 2001-2004. So watch out for Melissa.
Btw, I'd pick Morgan, Mitt or Maurice for 2024.
Cleveland Kent Evans wrote:They should avoid Mitt if they want to avoid any political connotations, because Mitt Romney is just about the only person in the world who has that name on his birth certificate. Even for him, it's officially his middle name.
I would like Mason, Miles, or Marlon myself. I suspect the replacement will actually be Mark or Mike, though.
I think Mark would actually be a great name for a hurricane -- I personally wouldn't use it because it's too much like Marco and Martin, the other two male names on the Atlantic lists. But that isn't going to stop the meteorologists on the WMO committee, as they had no problem having Danny and Danielle along with Julian and Julia AND Nicholas and Nicole on 2021 and 2022 lists, not to mention having Paula and Paulette, Chris and Cristobal, and Vicky and Victor all on the lists. Whoever suggests names in the US weather establishment also seems to have a thing for replacement names that sound or look like what they are replacing -- they replaced Katrina and Rita with Katia and Rina, for gosh sakes, and last year went with Harold and Margot as replacements for Harvey and Maria, when they start with the same three letters. So I think Mike, Milo, and Myron have a chance just because the start with the same sound as Michael.
Torino wrote:
Mark and Mike are too similar to Marco and Michael. Perhaps in the future, but for replacement names now it seems inappropriate.
AnnularCane wrote:Barring that, Mark or Malcolm would be nice too. I don't really see them replacing Michael with Mike, although they might conceivably do that with another M name. They did use Fred (nickname for Frederic) as a replacement name, after all.
Cleveland Kent Evans wrote:Torino wrote:
Mark and Mike are too similar to Marco and Michael. Perhaps in the future, but for replacement names now it seems inappropriate.
Oh, I agree. But they have made precisely this sort of "inappropriate" choice in the past, as I pointed out.
Users browsing this forum: BobHarlem, cainjamin, Cpv17, Craters, FLCrackerGirl, LarryWx, Sps123, Stratton23, Texoz, Wampadawg and 90 guests