ATL: MICHAEL - Post-Tropical - Discussion
Moderator: S2k Moderators
- SouthDadeFish
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 2835
- Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2010 2:54 pm
- Location: Miami, FL
- Contact:
Re: ATL: MICHAEL - Hurricane - Discussion
The Air Force plane is about to make a NE-SW pass, which should capture the true max winds in the NE quadrant. I'm expecting to see some 120+ kt FL winds. I really don't like the look of this... That is some very deep convection that has been firing over the past 6 hours or so.
4 likes
- SeaBrz_FL
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 472
- Age: 69
- Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2004 10:47 am
- Location: Cape Canaveral, FL
Re: ATL: MICHAEL - Hurricane - Discussion
Live Storms Media has been doing live short feeds all day in the Panhandle. A new one shows the traffic nightmare in Crestview of vehicles trying to head north on Hwy 85.
https://bit.ly/2E9XOTQ
https://bit.ly/2E9XOTQ
1 likes
-
- Tropical Wave
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2018 11:38 am
Re: ATL: MICHAEL - Hurricane - Discussion
wxman57 wrote:salescall wrote:Anyone know if the oil rigs in the gulf will be impacted from the storm? Just curious if we will see a spike in gas prices like there were during Katrina and other gulf storms.
Not too much. Probably evacuating non-essentials from offshore SE LA, but that's it. I just brief them, they don't tell me what they are doing. I couldn't tell you if I did know their plans.
Gulf of Mexico may lose 300-400 thousand barrels of day of production for crude.
Bigger issue for gasoline prices isn't really the lost oil production but refinery impact. There won't be refinery impact with Michael, so I don't anticipate an impact on the gasoline market.
Should be net bearish for natural gas with loss of heating demand vs. losing only about 0.3 bcf/d of production.
3 likes
- Blizzard96x
- Tropical Depression
- Posts: 84
- Joined: Wed Aug 19, 2015 4:34 am
Re: ATL: MICHAEL - Hurricane - Discussion
Cranky thinks the NHC statement of a 120mph hurricane is not accurate.
https://twitter.com/crankywxguy/status/ ... 1324503040
https://twitter.com/crankywxguy/status/ ... 1324503040
0 likes
Re: ATL: MICHAEL - Hurricane - Discussion
StruThiO wrote:Cranky is completely out of line
Agree.
1 likes
- Hurricaneman
- Category 5
- Posts: 7356
- Age: 45
- Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 3:24 pm
- Location: central florida
Re: ATL: MICHAEL - Hurricane - Discussion
Blizzard96x wrote:Cranky thinks the NHC statement of a 120mph hurricane is not accurate.
https://twitter.com/crankywxguy/status/ ... 1324503040
False statements like this is why people get hurt
1 likes
Re: ATL: MICHAEL - Hurricane - Discussion
Before it gets crazy busy in here.....
I have all of my Florida peeps in my prayers especially those in the northern counties. I am truly scared to death for you. Take care and if you haven't left yet GET OUT NOW!
For those in the surrounding southern counties - please don't drive through flooded streets! We may have a bit more of those than they are expecting.
Bless you all and my lovely home state!
I have all of my Florida peeps in my prayers especially those in the northern counties. I am truly scared to death for you. Take care and if you haven't left yet GET OUT NOW!
For those in the surrounding southern counties - please don't drive through flooded streets! We may have a bit more of those than they are expecting.
Bless you all and my lovely home state!
7 likes
Re: ATL: MICHAEL - Hurricane - Discussion
Blizzard96x wrote:Cranky thinks the NHC statement of a 120mph hurricane is not accurate.
https://twitter.com/crankywxguy/status/ ... 1324503040
The next poster Kevin nailed it.
"You are using a prediction center digital graphic to make an outlandish point when recon data directly refutes your effort?"
Followed by NewEngland WX Guy
Replying to @crankywxguy
deepest cat 1 I've ever seen
Last edited by sponger on Tue Oct 09, 2018 5:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
5 likes
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
Re: ATL: MICHAEL - Hurricane - Discussion
SeaBrz_FL wrote:Live Storms Media has been doing live short feeds all day in the Panhandle. A new one shows the traffic nightmare in Crestview of vehicles trying to head north on Hwy 85.
https://bit.ly/2E9XOTQ
Is always mind boggling why people wait until the middle of the day to evacuate, if they would had left before sunrise they would had not encountered any traffic at all. This was the case all the time when I lived in Nola. If I lived there and I had not evacuated I would had planned to leave around 3 AM tonight and avoided all the traffic.
3 likes
Re: ATL: MICHAEL - Hurricane - Discussion
TWC reporting people riding it out on St George island.
1 likes
-
- Tropical Low
- Posts: 47
- Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2018 5:40 pm
- Location: Lauderdale-By-the-Sea ---> Coral Gables
Re: ATL: MICHAEL - Hurricane - Discussion
Blizzard96x wrote:Cranky thinks the NHC statement of a 120mph hurricane is not accurate.
https://twitter.com/crankywxguy/status/ ... 1324503040
Cranky is a wackjob. Let me trust this idiot over the amazing people at the NHC and TWO RECON MISSIONS currently, over his usual comments on how Michael is just a string of clouds. What he is doing is extremely dangerous downplaying this storm and I find it grossly negligent and harmful to the weather community and the good people trying to find information on Michael. Disgusting imo.
8 likes
- p1nheadlarry
- Category 2
- Posts: 672
- Age: 33
- Joined: Wed Jan 29, 2014 2:42 pm
- Location: SR County FL
Re: ATL: MICHAEL - Hurricane - Discussion
NotoSans wrote:Surprised to see NHC only showing a 110-knot peak. IMO they should rely less on the intensity guidance but forecast near-term peak intensity based on recent trends.
They did with Florence and got burned. With shear forecast to rise as well. 140 mph storm in NC (and SC) is unheard of dating back to 1851. A few examples of that for the northern Gulf.
1 likes
--;->#GoNoles--;->.
Re: ATL: MICHAEL - Hurricane - Discussion
Here we go, this is a solid Cat 3 Hurricane without any questions.
220600 2630N 08614W 6974 02853 9732 +089 +040 139108 111 093 051 00
220630 2629N 08615W 6942 02862 9699 +090 +040 143106 108 104 058 00
$$
220600 2630N 08614W 6974 02853 9732 +089 +040 139108 111 093 051 00
220630 2629N 08615W 6942 02862 9699 +090 +040 143106 108 104 058 00
$$
Last edited by NDG on Tue Oct 09, 2018 5:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
- cycloneye
- Admin
- Posts: 145645
- Age: 68
- Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
- Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico
Re: ATL: MICHAEL - Hurricane - Discussion
111 kts before plane enters eye.
111 093 051 00
111 093 051 00
1 likes
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here
- HurricaneBelle
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 1179
- Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 6:12 pm
- Location: Clearwater, FL
Re: ATL: MICHAEL - Hurricane - Discussion
Coastal NC shouldn't sleep on this storm either - the NHC expects it to emerge fairly healthy off the coast judging by these hurricane & TS wind probabilities accompanying the latest advisory, including a 31% probability of hurricane winds at Hatteras:
CAPE HATTERAS 34 X X( X) X( X) 1( 1) 72(73) X(73) X(73)
CAPE HATTERAS 50 X X( X) X( X) X( X) 48(48) X(48) X(48)
CAPE HATTERAS 64 X X( X) X( X) X( X) 31(31) X(31) X(31)
FAYETTEVILLE 34 X X( X) 1( 1) 14(15) 59(74) X(74) X(74)
FAYETTEVILLE 50 X X( X) X( X) 1( 1) 37(38) X(38) X(38)
FAYETTEVILLE 64 X X( X) X( X) X( X) 12(12) X(12) X(12)
CHERRY PT NC 34 X X( X) X( X) 4( 4) 71(75) X(75) X(75)
CHERRY PT NC 50 X X( X) X( X) X( X) 47(47) X(47) X(47)
CHERRY PT NC 64 X X( X) X( X) X( X) 22(22) X(22) X(22)
NEW RIVER NC 34 X X( X) X( X) 3( 3) 67(70) X(70) X(70)
NEW RIVER NC 50 X X( X) X( X) X( X) 41(41) X(41) X(41)
NEW RIVER NC 64 X X( X) X( X) X( X) 22(22) X(22) X(22)
MOREHEAD CITY 34 X X( X) X( X) 4( 4) 67(71) X(71) X(71)
MOREHEAD CITY 50 X X( X) X( X) X( X) 43(43) X(43) X(43)
MOREHEAD CITY 64 X X( X) X( X) X( X) 24(24) X(24) X(24)
SURF CITY NC 34 X X( X) X( X) 7( 7) 65(72) X(72) X(72)
SURF CITY NC 50 X X( X) X( X) X( X) 38(38) X(38) X(38)
SURF CITY NC 64 X X( X) X( X) X( X) 16(16) X(16) X(16)
WILMINGTON NC 34 X X( X) X( X) 10(10) 62(72) X(72) X(72)
WILMINGTON NC 50 X X( X) X( X) X( X) 36(36) X(36) X(36)
WILMINGTON NC 64 X X( X) X( X) X( X) 15(15) X(15) X(15)
0 likes
Re: ATL: MICHAEL - Hurricane - Discussion
Just saw a photo of Clearwater Beach flooding already. Sorry. I dont know how to post photos. I suspect with astronomical high tide, we are going to get serious flooding tomorrow. I can only imagine points North.
Last edited by caneman on Tue Oct 09, 2018 5:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.
1 likes
Re: ATL: MICHAEL - Hurricane - Discussion

16 likes
The above post and any post by dhweather is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to NWS products.
-
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 34002
- Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
- Location: Deep South, for the first time!
Re: ATL: MICHAEL - Hurricane - Discussion
NDG wrote:Here we go, this is a solid Cat 3 Hurricane without any questions.
220600 2630N 08614W 6974 02853 9732 +089 +040 139108 111 093 051 00
220630 2629N 08615W 6942 02862 9699 +090 +040 143106 108 104 058 00
$$
At a minimum, that supports the current 105 kt intensity.
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests