Wurbus wrote:Anyone see footage of Cape San Blas? I'm sure they were hit very hard with wind and storm surge and I'm guessing it looks a lot like Mexico Beach.
Haven't yet, but I know it's going to be bad. The whole peninsula is so low elevation.
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Wurbus wrote:Anyone see footage of Cape San Blas? I'm sure they were hit very hard with wind and storm surge and I'm guessing it looks a lot like Mexico Beach.
MidnightRain wrote:I am still trying to wrap my mind around this. A little over 72 hours ago this was suppose to be a tropical storm/low end hurricane along the Gulf coast. It never stopped strengthening since day one. Made a run at category 5 off the coast of the Florida panhandle.
Michael might be one of the biggest weather phenomenons I'll ever see.
drezee wrote:Mexico beach Facebook page made me sick. So many people stayed and are missing. Even some in the pictures of whole buildings that are gone. Rustic Palms RV and campground had so many people who stayed in trailers.
jlauderdal wrote:Surge, big wind, weak structures..that isnt a good combination, lets hope loss of life is minimalAdamFirst wrote:chaser1 wrote:
Yet, there's been no reports of any found bodies or deaths from there??
Not to be cryptic, but I believe it's only a matter of time. We hope for the best but seeing the images from Panama City Beach eastward...it'd be hard surviving that.
tolakram wrote:https://twitter.com/USAFCCF/status/1050139034339762176
Hurrilurker wrote:Even if you managed to escape severe destruction, just imagine how long it's going to take just to get a window replaced. There's probably tens of thousands of broken windows and not enough glass or labor in the whole state to fix them for a while.
Steve wrote:drezee wrote:Mexico beach Facebook page made me sick. So many people stayed and are missing. Even some in the pictures of whole buildings that are gone. Rustic Palms RV and campground had so many people who stayed in trailers.
That’s a giant wt*? scenario. You don’t stay in a freaking campground or RV Park with a Category 1 coming at you.
StruThiO wrote::uarrow:
Very strong language being used here..
supercane4867 wrote:That's something you expect to see in a storm like Andrew or Camille
https://twitter.com/NimbusStorms/status/1050137995255398402
AnnularCane wrote:Hurrilurker wrote:tolakram wrote:https://twitter.com/GarofaloWX/status/1050178849273593856
Wow, that is really scary, especially because that type of building -- brick school gymnasium -- is often used as shelter space.
I know wide, expansive spaces like that are considered bad shelter in a tornado, but could that be the same in a hurricane?
1900hurricane wrote:Just for comparison's sake, the KZC analysis I did with the 919 mb pressure yields an intensity estimate of about 140 kt.
https://twitter.com/1900hurricane/status/1050122810801176588
Craters wrote:AnnularCane wrote:Hurrilurker wrote:Wow, that is really scary, especially because that type of building -- brick school gymnasium -- is often used as shelter space.
I know wide, expansive spaces like that are considered bad shelter in a tornado, but could that be the same in a hurricane?
To my admittedly untrained eye, that does look like tornado damage. I wonder if that's what caused it...
supercane4867 wrote:Catastraphic wind damage in Panama City. Very impressive consider they were in weaker side of eyewall
https://i.imgur.com/TnW8fv7.jpg
Models did well with the genesis of michael, will see if they crank one more out to close the season ...navgem and hwrf were very good the last few days but even hwrf undershot intensity and it is usually the one overcooking..nhc nailed the track but intensity forecasting is still very challanging for the computers and humans..hopefully people in evacuation zones that stayed did ok..however, people in non evac really struggled with this system and their relatively weak structureschaser1 wrote:jlauderdal wrote:They are looking for the next model run that shows developmentchaser1 wrote:
I was thinking the same thing, but then realized this. Those who were up all night tracking and analyzing Michael's Sat pic's and data, are probably taking a "brain break". Those who chased it, are probably asleep. Those who directly faced the prospect of loosing their home, property and loved ones from the harrowing threat, are probably drinking heavily.
Finally, that leaves both you and I. We obviously have no life.
I'm not gonna lie; I was kinda wondering about that new area of low pressure expected to form in the W. Caribbean in the days to come
Steve wrote:MidnightRain wrote:I am still trying to wrap my mind around this. A little over 72 hours ago this was suppose to be a tropical storm/low end hurricane along the Gulf coast. It never stopped strengthening since day one. Made a run at category 5 off the coast of the Florida panhandle.
Michael might be one of the biggest weather phenomenons I'll ever see.
You might be surprised to know that the strengthening was telegraphed by the upper pattern in advance. Models don’t always catch that. But the north Gulf was primed. I don’t think anyone would have guessed it would go all the way to the borderline of a 4/5, but many posters pointed pointed it out this weekend and early week. Whenever there is that type of upper pattern ahead, it’s usualy just a matter of time.
Tropical storms and depressions strengthened on average by about 7 kt for every 12 h over the Gulf, except for little change during their final 12 h before landfall. Hurricanes underwent a different systematic evolution. In the net, category 1–2 hurricanes strengthened, while category 3–5 hurricanes weakened such that tropical cyclones approach the threshold of major hurricane status by U.S. landfall. This behavior can be partially explained by consideration of the maximum potential intensity modified by the environmental vertical wind shear and hurricane-induced sea surface temperature reduction near the storm center associated with relatively low oceanic heat content levels.
“Rapid intensification,” or RI, when systems intensify by at least 30 kt (about two SSHWS categories) in 24 h, occurs about 6% of the time (Kaplan et al. 2010) and rarely, if ever, is forecast accurately by the NHC.
A comparison of the atmospheric variables between the two groups [non-major and major hurricanes] showed that there were no significant differences in the 200-hPa temperature and divergence from 0 to 36 h. The average vertical shear, however, was lower and the low-level RH was higher along the storm tracks at all time periods from 0 to 36 h for the MH cases. This result indicates that the atmospheric variables were actually more favorable for the MH cases, and does not explain why those storms tended to weaken while the NMHs continued to intensify.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 52 guests