ATL: BARRY - Models

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
jaguars_22
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 590
Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2017 2:26 pm
Location: Victoria TX

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#241 Postby jaguars_22 » Tue Jul 09, 2019 11:34 am

The RGEM is showing the low consolidating further south which would not be good for middle texas where I am at.
1 likes   

User avatar
ColdMiser123
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 904
Age: 29
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2016 3:26 pm
Location: Northeast US

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#242 Postby ColdMiser123 » Tue Jul 09, 2019 11:34 am

CMC has much better vertical alignment than previous runs. Further south, stronger through 54 hours compared to 0z.
0 likes   
B.S., M.S., Meteorology & Atmospheric Science

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22978
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#243 Postby wxman57 » Tue Jul 09, 2019 11:39 am

NAVGEM is my model of choice. However, you need to add 180 deg to its predicted track. Currently, NAVGEM says South Carolina...
5 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22978
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#244 Postby wxman57 » Tue Jul 09, 2019 11:40 am

Siker wrote:Yikes on the UKMET:

NEW TROPICAL CYCLONE FORECAST TO DEVELOP AFTER 42 HOURS
FORECAST POSITION AT T+ 42 : 28.2N 87.6W

LEAD CENTRAL MAXIMUM WIND
VERIFYING TIME TIME POSITION PRESSURE (MB) SPEED (KNOTS)
-------------- ---- -------- ------------- -------------
1200UTC 11.07.2019 48 28.1N 88.8W 1005 32
0000UTC 12.07.2019 60 27.8N 90.0W 995 43
1200UTC 12.07.2019 72 28.3N 91.6W 982 68
0000UTC 13.07.2019 84 28.6N 92.6W 966 75
1200UTC 13.07.2019 96 29.8N 93.6W 946 82
0000UTC 14.07.2019 108 31.5N 94.2W 975 40
1200UTC 14.07.2019 120 33.2N 94.5W 980 39
0000UTC 15.07.2019 132 34.8N 95.2W 988 28
1200UTC 15.07.2019 144 36.2N 95.7W 994 28


The UKMET keeps the center offshore an extra 24 hours over other models with that 7am Sunday landfall near Sabine Pass. I'm not buying that solution. Thinking landfall near western Vermilion Bay before noon Saturday as a 50kt TS (+/- 15 kts)
1 likes   

User avatar
SoupBone
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3111
Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2005 5:24 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#245 Postby SoupBone » Tue Jul 09, 2019 11:41 am

Isn't the UKMET notorious for bombing out systems? One of them does it frequently if I remember correctly.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9621
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Not a state-caster

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#246 Postby Steve » Tue Jul 09, 2019 11:41 am

ColdMiser123 wrote:CMC has much better vertical alignment than previous runs. Further south, stronger through 54 hours compared to 0z.


It's finally joining the consensus. 992mb at 84 hours (how far TT shows it).

https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysi ... 0912&fh=84

Looks south of St. Mary/Iberia Parishes. That's where Andrew hit in 1992.
0 likes   

User avatar
ColdMiser123
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 904
Age: 29
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2016 3:26 pm
Location: Northeast US

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#247 Postby ColdMiser123 » Tue Jul 09, 2019 11:43 am

wxman57 wrote:
Siker wrote:Yikes on the UKMET:

NEW TROPICAL CYCLONE FORECAST TO DEVELOP AFTER 42 HOURS
FORECAST POSITION AT T+ 42 : 28.2N 87.6W

LEAD CENTRAL MAXIMUM WIND
VERIFYING TIME TIME POSITION PRESSURE (MB) SPEED (KNOTS)
-------------- ---- -------- ------------- -------------
1200UTC 11.07.2019 48 28.1N 88.8W 1005 32
0000UTC 12.07.2019 60 27.8N 90.0W 995 43
1200UTC 12.07.2019 72 28.3N 91.6W 982 68
0000UTC 13.07.2019 84 28.6N 92.6W 966 75
1200UTC 13.07.2019 96 29.8N 93.6W 946 82
0000UTC 14.07.2019 108 31.5N 94.2W 975 40
1200UTC 14.07.2019 120 33.2N 94.5W 980 39
0000UTC 15.07.2019 132 34.8N 95.2W 988 28
1200UTC 15.07.2019 144 36.2N 95.7W 994 28


The UKMET keeps the center offshore an extra 24 hours over other models with that 7am Sunday landfall near Sabine Pass. I'm not buying that solution.


The 96 hour coordinate of 29.8N, 93.6W puts the disturbance right on the coast just east of the TX/LA border at 7 am CDT Saturday July 13th. Pretty consistent with other guidance so far.
Last edited by ColdMiser123 on Tue Jul 09, 2019 11:47 am, edited 1 time in total.
1 likes   
B.S., M.S., Meteorology & Atmospheric Science

User avatar
Hypercane_Kyle
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3352
Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2015 7:58 pm
Location: Cape Canaveral, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#248 Postby Hypercane_Kyle » Tue Jul 09, 2019 11:46 am

Anyone know why the HWRF hasn't been run yet on 92L?
1 likes   
My posts are my own personal opinion, defer to the National Hurricane Center (NHC) and other NOAA products for decision making during hurricane season.

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9621
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Not a state-caster

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#249 Postby Steve » Tue Jul 09, 2019 11:48 am

Canadian landfall about 1am Saturday @ 993mb near Abbeville & Pecan Island. That's roughly where Lili hit back in 2002.
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22978
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#250 Postby wxman57 » Tue Jul 09, 2019 11:50 am

ColdMiser123 wrote:
wxman57 wrote:
Siker wrote:Yikes on the UKMET:

NEW TROPICAL CYCLONE FORECAST TO DEVELOP AFTER 42 HOURS
FORECAST POSITION AT T+ 42 : 28.2N 87.6W

LEAD CENTRAL MAXIMUM WIND
VERIFYING TIME TIME POSITION PRESSURE (MB) SPEED (KNOTS)
-------------- ---- -------- ------------- -------------
1200UTC 11.07.2019 48 28.1N 88.8W 1005 32
0000UTC 12.07.2019 60 27.8N 90.0W 995 43
1200UTC 12.07.2019 72 28.3N 91.6W 982 68
0000UTC 13.07.2019 84 28.6N 92.6W 966 75
1200UTC 13.07.2019 96 29.8N 93.6W 946 82
0000UTC 14.07.2019 108 31.5N 94.2W 975 40
1200UTC 14.07.2019 120 33.2N 94.5W 980 39
0000UTC 15.07.2019 132 34.8N 95.2W 988 28
1200UTC 15.07.2019 144 36.2N 95.7W 994 28


The UKMET keeps the center offshore an extra 24 hours over other models with that 7am Sunday landfall near Sabine Pass. I'm not buying that solution.


The 96 hour coordinate of 29.8N, 93.6W puts the disturbance right on the coast just east of the TX/LA border at 7 am CDT Saturday July 13th. Pretty consistent with other guidance so far.


You are correct. Had an error in my plotting program. Had it set for 24hr points vs. 12hr. Still, I think the UK is too far west and too strong.
1 likes   

User avatar
Siker
Category 4
Category 4
Posts: 904
Age: 28
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2012 7:36 pm
Location: Miami, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#251 Postby Siker » Tue Jul 09, 2019 11:50 am

Finally found my old UKMET plotter, need to make the land look less awful but here is a map:

Image
2 likes   

User avatar
ColdMiser123
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 904
Age: 29
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2016 3:26 pm
Location: Northeast US

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#252 Postby ColdMiser123 » Tue Jul 09, 2019 11:51 am

wxman57 wrote:
ColdMiser123 wrote:
wxman57 wrote:
The UKMET keeps the center offshore an extra 24 hours over other models with that 7am Sunday landfall near Sabine Pass. I'm not buying that solution.


The 96 hour coordinate of 29.8N, 93.6W puts the disturbance right on the coast just east of the TX/LA border at 7 am CDT Saturday July 13th. Pretty consistent with other guidance so far.


You are correct. Had an error in my plotting program. Had it set for 24hr points vs. 12hr. Still, I think the UK is too far west and too strong.


I was pretty taken aback by how strong it is forecasting 92L to get at this point. Definitely need to see more run to run consistency before buying into those kinds of strong solutions.
1 likes   
B.S., M.S., Meteorology & Atmospheric Science

stormlover2013

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#253 Postby stormlover2013 » Tue Jul 09, 2019 11:54 am

Ukmet and cmc are farther west till we have a center will keep bouncing I mean upper tx/la seems like a good i mean euro, ukmet, gfs all pretty close could bounce 80-100 miles east or west just never know
0 likes   

User avatar
ColdMiser123
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 904
Age: 29
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2016 3:26 pm
Location: Northeast US

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#254 Postby ColdMiser123 » Tue Jul 09, 2019 11:58 am

Hypercane_Kyle wrote:Anyone know why the HWRF hasn't been run yet on 92L?


Not a definite answer, but I'm wondering if it has something to do with initializing the circulation over land. I'll ask my research advisors who specialize in data assimilation and model parameterizations if that's the case at some point in the next few days.
Last edited by ColdMiser123 on Tue Jul 09, 2019 11:59 am, edited 1 time in total.
1 likes   
B.S., M.S., Meteorology & Atmospheric Science

sphelps8681
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 785
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2007 5:37 pm
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#255 Postby sphelps8681 » Tue Jul 09, 2019 11:58 am

Siker wrote:Finally found my old UKMET plotter, need to make the land look less awful but here is a map:

https://i.imgur.com/VLO7jvF.png


What category is that making landfall?
0 likes   

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9621
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Not a state-caster

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#256 Postby Steve » Tue Jul 09, 2019 12:06 pm

sphelps8681 wrote:
Siker wrote:Finally found my old UKMET plotter, need to make the land look less awful but here is a map:

https://i.imgur.com/VLO7jvF.png


What category is that making landfall?


I don't have the wind outputs, but usually around sub-950mb is around a 3. However, you can have 3's with much higher and much lower barometric pressures depending on circumstance.
0 likes   

hohnywx
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 508
Age: 34
Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 8:34 pm
Location: Hastings-on-Hudson, NY

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#257 Postby hohnywx » Tue Jul 09, 2019 12:13 pm

sphelps8681 wrote:
Siker wrote:Finally found my old UKMET plotter, need to make the land look less awful but here is a map:

https://i.imgur.com/VLO7jvF.png


What category is that making landfall?


The forecast shows a max sustained wind speed of 82 kts (95 MPH). So, borderline Cat 1/2.
1 likes   

User avatar
HeeBGBz
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 341
Age: 70
Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 3:25 pm
Location: Biloxi, MS

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#258 Postby HeeBGBz » Tue Jul 09, 2019 12:16 pm

Hi everyone. Back at it again. Has the noon Euro started yet?
1 likes   

User avatar
ColdMiser123
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 904
Age: 29
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2016 3:26 pm
Location: Northeast US

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#259 Postby ColdMiser123 » Tue Jul 09, 2019 12:17 pm

HeeBGBz wrote:Hi everyone. Back at it again. Has the noon Euro started yet?


Euro will start running at ~1:45. Frames for this system will likely be from ~2:00 to ~2:20.
0 likes   
B.S., M.S., Meteorology & Atmospheric Science

User avatar
SoupBone
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3111
Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2005 5:24 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#260 Postby SoupBone » Tue Jul 09, 2019 12:22 pm

The ever-infamous (which means more than famous) GFS Legacy takes it into Mobile, or at least that's what it looks like. Can't zoom in enough.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.


Return to “2019”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests