ATL: BARRY - Models

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
mcheer23
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 436
Age: 32
Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2012 8:24 pm
Location: Sugar Land, Texas

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#461 Postby mcheer23 » Tue Jul 09, 2019 11:08 pm

UKMET Galveston.....
1 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34002
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#462 Postby CrazyC83 » Tue Jul 09, 2019 11:09 pm

No matter what, we can't rule anyone out at this point. Anyone from Corpus Christi to Pascagoula is fair game.
3 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145327
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#463 Postby cycloneye » Tue Jul 09, 2019 11:09 pm

Yikes.Cat 2 from UKMET.
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

stormlover2013

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#464 Postby stormlover2013 » Tue Jul 09, 2019 11:10 pm

Pic of ukmet ?
1 likes   

User avatar
ColdMiser123
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 904
Age: 29
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2016 3:26 pm
Location: Northeast US

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#465 Postby ColdMiser123 » Tue Jul 09, 2019 11:14 pm

0z Best Track had the low over land once again, so not sure if we are going to get HWRF/HMON runs at 0z. Likely will at 6z.
0 likes   
B.S., M.S., Meteorology & Atmospheric Science

User avatar
MississippiWx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1699
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2010 1:44 pm
Location: Hattiesburg, Mississippi

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#466 Postby MississippiWx » Tue Jul 09, 2019 11:16 pm

ColdMiser123 wrote:0z Best Track had the low over land once again, so not sure if we are going to get HWRF/HMON runs at 0z. Likely will at 6z.


HMON is running now.
1 likes   
This post is not an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of MississippiWx and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is not endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org. For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

floridasun78
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3755
Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 10:16 pm
Location: miami fl

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#467 Postby floridasun78 » Tue Jul 09, 2019 11:16 pm

so now models want out dinner chance their mind want go more west ? let see all join party? one thing i have say let wait to see were center form that way models get better handed of it could go west and east in models next few days
1 likes   

User avatar
TheProfessor
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 3506
Age: 28
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 10:56 am
Location: Wichita, Kansas

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#468 Postby TheProfessor » Tue Jul 09, 2019 11:17 pm

The 0z Ukmet starts the low quite a bit further south than the other model, which leads to the scary Galveston solution. A storm that far south would likely struggle to feel the weakness to the north.
2 likes   
An alumnus of The Ohio State University.

Your local National Weather Service office is your best source for weather information.

User avatar
South Texas Storms
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4226
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 12:28 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#469 Postby South Texas Storms » Tue Jul 09, 2019 11:19 pm

MississippiWx wrote:Trend with 0z guidance has been a faster motion initially. CMC is also faster.


Yep, sure is. That will likely lead to a farther west track.
0 likes   

BobHarlem
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2108
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2005 6:11 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#470 Postby BobHarlem » Tue Jul 09, 2019 11:20 pm

stormlover2013 wrote:Pic of ukmet ?


Blue line that goes across Galveston:
Image
1 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9484
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#471 Postby ROCK » Tue Jul 09, 2019 11:20 pm

Consolidate the COC and then let the best track models
run..Uk is outlier but reliable Euro sniffed west also a few runs ago. Can’t jump off the ledge now..:)) too early to tell :cheesy:
2 likes   

Stormcenter
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6684
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#472 Postby Stormcenter » Tue Jul 09, 2019 11:22 pm

GFS and CMC sticking to SE LA.
0 likes   

User avatar
MississippiWx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1699
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2010 1:44 pm
Location: Hattiesburg, Mississippi

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#473 Postby MississippiWx » Tue Jul 09, 2019 11:24 pm

South Texas Storms wrote:
MississippiWx wrote:Trend with 0z guidance has been a faster motion initially. CMC is also faster.


Yep, sure is. That will likely lead to a farther west track.


True, but I'm wondering how far west it can actually go with a huge mid-level ridge acting as a wall. The UKMET is likely unrealistic because of this reasoning. I think TX/LA coast is very possible. Galveston seems unrealistic, but we will see. Very complicated steering and not as simple as I have pointed out, I'm sure.
0 likes   
This post is not an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of MississippiWx and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is not endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org. For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9484
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#474 Postby ROCK » Tue Jul 09, 2019 11:25 pm

Stormcenter wrote:GFS and CMC sticking to SE LA.


Wait for it...:)) UKMET is super reliable..:)))
1 likes   

User avatar
South Texas Storms
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4226
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 12:28 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#475 Postby South Texas Storms » Tue Jul 09, 2019 11:26 pm

MississippiWx wrote:
South Texas Storms wrote:
MississippiWx wrote:Trend with 0z guidance has been a faster motion initially. CMC is also faster.


Yep, sure is. That will likely lead to a farther west track.


True, but I'm wondering how far west it can actually go with a huge mid-level ridge acting as a wall. The UKMET is likely unrealistic because of this reasoning. I think TX/LA coast is very possible. Galveston seems unrealistic, but we will see. Very complicated steering and not as simple as I have pointed out, I'm sure.


I'm not sure how far west the limit is. We've had several Euro ensemble members taking it as far west as Corpus for days now.
1 likes   

stormlover2013

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#476 Postby stormlover2013 » Tue Jul 09, 2019 11:26 pm

MississippiWx wrote:
South Texas Storms wrote:
MississippiWx wrote:Trend with 0z guidance has been a faster motion initially. CMC is also faster.


Yep, sure is. That will likely lead to a farther west track.


True, but I'm wondering how far west it can actually go with a huge mid-level ridge acting as a wall. The UKMET is likely unrealistic because of this reasoning. I think TX/LA coast is very possible. Galveston seems unrealistic, but we will see. Very complicated steering and not as simple as I have pointed out, I'm sure.



Ukmet is the Second best behind the European in the day 5 or less range.
2 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9484
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#477 Postby ROCK » Tue Jul 09, 2019 11:28 pm

MississippiWx wrote:
South Texas Storms wrote:
MississippiWx wrote:Trend with 0z guidance has been a faster motion initially. CMC is also faster.


Yep, sure is. That will likely lead to a farther west track.


True, but I'm wondering how far west it can actually go with a huge mid-level ridge acting as a wall. The UKMET is likely unrealistic because of this reasoning. I think TX/LA coast is very possible. Galveston seems unrealistic, but we will see. Very complicated steering and not as simple as I have pointed out, I'm sure.



It’s July and ridging will be there. That front proged to drop down to TN and GA lol...good luck with that lmao
3 likes   

User avatar
MississippiWx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1699
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2010 1:44 pm
Location: Hattiesburg, Mississippi

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#478 Postby MississippiWx » Tue Jul 09, 2019 11:34 pm

stormlover2013 wrote:
MississippiWx wrote:
South Texas Storms wrote:
Yep, sure is. That will likely lead to a farther west track.


True, but I'm wondering how far west it can actually go with a huge mid-level ridge acting as a wall. The UKMET is likely unrealistic because of this reasoning. I think TX/LA coast is very possible. Galveston seems unrealistic, but we will see. Very complicated steering and not as simple as I have pointed out, I'm sure.



Ukmet is the Second best behind the European in the day 5 or less range.


Statistics for models don't mean anything with individual storms. Sure, all of us will take the Euro over most any other model, but that doesn't mean it will be right. I'm taking this at face value and what models are predicting for the 500mb pattern. It seems odd for any model to show a storm driving straight through the middle of a strong 500mb ridge. I would like to see the wind flows with height from the UKMET, but I don't think we can find that info anywhere on the internet.
1 likes   
This post is not an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of MississippiWx and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is not endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org. For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
ColdMiser123
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 904
Age: 29
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2016 3:26 pm
Location: Northeast US

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#479 Postby ColdMiser123 » Tue Jul 09, 2019 11:58 pm

HMON and HWRF are both SW and stronger than 18z so far.
0 likes   
B.S., M.S., Meteorology & Atmospheric Science

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9621
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Not a state-caster

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#480 Postby Steve » Wed Jul 10, 2019 12:00 am

I've been out and am behind.

O.G.FS goes in around Grand Isle just after midnight Friday at 992 on the TT Resolution. It gloes out through Mississippi and then sort of hangs around Monroe and SE AR for a bit and heads out north.

Canadian goes in a bit farther west and moves up the Sabine River and TX/LA border slowly and meanders a bit near Shreveport.

JMA super low res has a circulation across much of SELA in 72 hours.

HWRF at 39 hours has the low south of Grand Isle. Seems a bit fast maybe? We'll see where it goes.

HWRF-P hasn't started 00z run output yet. 18z was the worst case probably of all the options with a 944 moving into Cameron Parish. Looks bad though less people near the coast there. We'll see what it brings later.

HMON is out to 54 hours. That is valid for 1am Friday. Storm is pretty far south at about 27.3 and at 988mb- It's not far enough out yet to see if it makes the turn.

I'm gonna watch but I'm probably done for today unless something sick comes out. Keep me posted.
0 likes   


Return to “2019”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests