Hurricaneman wrote:The American models seem to be on their own while every other model recurves up the east coast
But note that the GFS and Legacy are both trending east now even though they're still far to the west of the non-American runs.
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Hurricaneman wrote:The American models seem to be on their own while every other model recurves up the east coast
Steve wrote:CMC sort of splits the difference and goes up Florida.
https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysi ... 91212&fh=6
LarryWx wrote:Hurricaneman wrote:The American models seem to be on their own while every other model recurves up the east coast
But note that the GFS and Legacy are both trending east now even though they're still far to the west of the non-American runs.
ronjon wrote:LarryWx wrote:Hurricaneman wrote:The American models seem to be on their own while every other model recurves up the east coast
But note that the GFS and Legacy are both trending east now even though they're still far to the west of the non-American runs.
Not really - GFS has been pretty consistent the last several runs - the big difference is they keep the system weak. Time will tell. CMC trended west - NAM and NAVGEM similar to GFS. So far the only model to really ramp up development is the Euro and ICON. We'll have to see if the Euro sticks to its guns for the 12z run.
Craters wrote:There's been a flurry of posts in the last page or two that use the word "progressive," which can be interpreted in more than one way. Can somebody explain how the word is being used here in the context of models, patterns, trends, etc? Or are there subtle differences depending on what "progressive" is describing?
Thank you...
TheStormExpert wrote:12z GFS still with an Eastern GoM solution, someone is going to bust big time here!
Michele B wrote:TheStormExpert wrote:12z GFS still with an Eastern GoM solution, someone is going to bust big time here!
I don't get it!
HOW can they over- or underestimate the ridging by so much as to make a couple hundred mile error like that?!?
Isn't the development of ridging a pretty straightforward thing? I mean, the jet stream and the associated "fronts" pretty much make it obvious where a HIGH or LOW pressure system is and where it will be going, don't they?
chaser1 wrote:
1) Weak and broad = S. Florida rain and west into the GOM
2) Organized and Strengthening = remain east of Florida and possible risk to South & North Carolina
3) The CMC sort of splits the difference and perhaps brings a "last second" T.D. to develop between W. Palm Beach and Vero
My guess on the odd's of either occurring are:
1) 10%
2) 60%
3) 30%
Michele B wrote:TheStormExpert wrote:12z GFS still with an Eastern GoM solution, someone is going to bust big time here!
I don't get it!
HOW can they over- or underestimate the ridging by so much as to make a couple hundred mile error like that?!?
Isn't the development of ridging a pretty straightforward thing? I mean, the jet stream and the associated "fronts" pretty much make it obvious where a HIGH or LOW pressure system is and where it will be going, don't they?
Hammy wrote:Michele B wrote:TheStormExpert wrote:12z GFS still with an Eastern GoM solution, someone is going to bust big time here!
I don't get it!
HOW can they over- or underestimate the ridging by so much as to make a couple hundred mile error like that?!?
Isn't the development of ridging a pretty straightforward thing? I mean, the jet stream and the associated "fronts" pretty much make it obvious where a HIGH or LOW pressure system is and where it will be going, don't they?
You can see on satellite and surface where the upper and lower fronts and troughs and highs are, but the 500MB isn't so easy to see on satellite or any visual data (hence why the soundings are used) and it seems like these tricky cases, it's the mid-level highs and lows that the models are struggling with so much.
chaser1 wrote:Craters wrote:There's been a flurry of posts in the last page or two that use the word "progressive," which can be interpreted in more than one way. Can somebody explain how the word is being used here in the context of models, patterns, trends, etc? Or are there subtle differences depending on what "progressive" is describing?
Thank you...
In terms of potential storm tracks and the models, "progressive" typically is referring to the overall pattern over North America (and W. Atlantic). More specifically, a large blocking high pressure area over the central U.S. and seemingly semi-stagnant trough off the U.S. east coast would NOT suggest a progressive pattern. Meanwhile, a fast moving zonal flow across the northern latitudes may move a new trough that drops down from the Great Lakes but this trough is moving to the east within that flow pretty quickly. This is what would be referred to a primarily "progressive flow" where every few days a new trough might enter the picture, but then move east and high pressure build back in. IIt is possible to have a progressive pattern where the troughs are deep and farther to the south, but in Summer high pressure ridging is more dominant over the Southern U.S. so troughs of low pressure tend to not be as strong and far south as they become toward Fall and Winter.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests