Hammy wrote:How late are they going to go with the reanalysis? There's quite a few systems in the 1980s that I feel should be added.
Even in the 1990s and 2000s, there are storms worth reanalyzing.
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Hammy wrote:How late are they going to go with the reanalysis? There's quite a few systems in the 1980s that I feel should be added.
CrazyC83 wrote:Hammy wrote:How late are they going to go with the reanalysis? There's quite a few systems in the 1980s that I feel should be added.
Even in the 1990s and 2000s, there are storms worth reanalyzing.
galaxy401 wrote:Isn't 1966-1970 about finished too? Maybe those will be released sometime next year.
Hammy wrote:galaxy401 wrote:Isn't 1966-1970 about finished too? Maybe those will be released sometime next year.
I hope so because this one (TD in 1970) has been on my radar for decades ever since I started reading about past seasons.
CrazyC83 wrote:Hammy wrote:galaxy401 wrote:Isn't 1966-1970 about finished too? Maybe those will be released sometime next year.
I hope so because this one (TD in 1970) has been on my radar for decades ever since I started reading about past seasons.
That was probably a solid tropical storm. Resolution is terrible there, but that would probably be about a T3.0 or even T3.5.
Hammy wrote:galaxy401 wrote:Isn't 1966-1970 about finished too? Maybe those will be released sometime next year.
I hope so because this one (TD in 1970) has been on my radar for decades ever since I started reading about past seasons.
https://i.imgur.com/stY9jxm.png
https://i.imgur.com/ewjeFcp.png
Hammy wrote:galaxy401 wrote:Isn't 1966-1970 about finished too? Maybe those will be released sometime next year.
I hope so because this one (TD in 1970) has been on my radar for decades ever since I started reading about past seasons.
https://i.imgur.com/stY9jxm.png
https://i.imgur.com/ewjeFcp.png
GSBHurricane wrote:Any reanalysis news recently?
Falling Soil wrote:Request from you lovely re-analyzing mets out there: Hurricane Anita 1977. I've wondered for years if a Cat 5 ever made landfall west of the Mississippi River, and this is the only candidate.. ADVthanksANCE!
Hammy wrote:Is there any preliminary stuff for 1966-70 out there?
Hammy wrote:Is there any preliminary stuff for 1966-70 out there?
CrazyC83 wrote:The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the NHC and NWS.
I know we were discussing that 1995 and 1996 could use some work, since that was the beginning of the modern era with new tools just coming out then. Here's my thoughts for Opal in 1995.
AL171995, OPAL, 40,
19950927, 1800, , TD, 19.1N, 87.3W, 30, 1004, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
19950928, 2300, L, TD, 19.4N, 87.4W, 30, 1004, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
19950928, 0000, , TD, 19.4N, 87.5W, 30, 1004, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
19950928, 0600, , TD, 19.4N, 87.9W, 30, 1004, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
19950928, 1200, , TD, 19.3N, 88.2W, 30, 1003, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
19950928, 1800, , TD, 19.3N, 88.4W, 30, 1003, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
19950929, 0000, , TS, 19.4N, 88.4W, 35, 1003, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
19950929, 0600, , TS, 19.5N, 88.4W, 35, 1003, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
19950929, 1200, , TS, 19.6N, 88.3W, 35, 1003, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
19950929, 1800, , TS, 19.8N, 88.2W, 35, 1003, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
19950930, 0000, , TS, 20.1N, 88.2W, 40, 1002, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
19950930, 0600, , TS, 20.6N, 88.3W, 40, 1002, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
19950930, 1200, , TS, 21.1N, 88.5W, 40, 1001, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
19950930, 1800, , TS, 21.4N, 89.1W, 45, 1000, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
19951001, 0000, , TS, 21.3N, 89.9W, 45, 994, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
19951001, 0600, , TS, 21.1N, 90.7W, 45, 987, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
19951001, 1200, , TS, 20.9N, 91.2W, 45, 986, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
19951001, 1800, , TS, 20.8N, 91.6W, 50, 986, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
19951002, 0000, , TS, 20.7N, 91.9W, 55, 983, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
19951002, 0600, , TS, 20.8N, 92.1W, 60, 979, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
19951002, 1200, , HU, 21.0N, 92.3W, 65, 975, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
19951002, 1800, , HU, 21.2N, 92.3W, 65, 972, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
19951003, 0000, , HU, 21.7N, 92.2W, 70, 969, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
19951003, 0600, , HU, 22.2N, 92.0W, 75, 968, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
19951003, 1200, , HU, 22.8N, 91.6W, 80, 966, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
19951003, 1800, , HU, 23.5N, 91.0W, 90, 961, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
19951004, 0000, , HU, 24.5N, 90.1W, 105, 949, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
19951004, 0600, , HU, 25.9N, 89.4W, 120, 931, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
19951004, 0900, I, HU, 26.4N, 89.0W, 135, 916, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
19951004, 1200, , HU, 27.3N, 88.5W, 130, 921, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
19951004, 1800, , HU, 29.0N, 87.7W, 110, 938, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
19951004, 2200, L, HU, 30.3N, 87.1W, 100, 944, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
19951005, 0000, , HU, 31.0N, 86.8W, 80, 954, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
19951005, 0600, , TS, 33.2N, 86.2W, 50, 974, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
19951005, 1200, , EX, 35.4N, 85.7W, 40, 982, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
19951005, 1800, , EX, 38.5N, 83.5W, 40, 986, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
19951006, 0000, , EX, 40.5N, 82.3W, 40, 989, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
19951006, 0600, , EX, 42.0N, 80.5W, 40, 991, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
19951006, 1200, , EX, 43.3N, 78.4W, 35, 997, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
19951006, 1800, , EX, 44.5N, 76.5W, 30, 1002, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
* I added an additional landfall very early in its life in the Yucatan while it was a tropical depression. That didn't appear in the original HURDAT best track.
* It is likely Opal became a tropical storm much earlier - no later than 0000Z September 29 - based on ship data. It's possible that it was a storm earlier still, but data was sparse. Tropical storm winds were only over water.
* The intensities in the Bay of Campeche were largely unchanged, with pressures tweaked based on Recon timing.
* The explosive intensification trend was smoothed out some. I went with 135 kt for a peak intensity. An argument could also be made for 140 kt, however, there is inherent uncertainty in the observations and the peak was a very sharp one. In addition, Opal was a very large storm, so the pressure relationships may have been lower than expected (it was quite a bit larger than Michael), although that was offset somewhat by its fast forward speed.
* The landfall intensity remained unchanged at 100 kt (the pressure a tad higher at 944 mb). Consideration was made for a 95 kt intensity, although there wasn't enough conclusive evidence to lower the intensity.
Users browsing this forum: IsabelaWeather and 86 guests