ATL: GONZALO - Remnants - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
EquusStorm
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1649
Age: 34
Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2013 1:04 pm
Location: Jasper, AL
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#241 Postby EquusStorm » Tue Jul 21, 2020 2:11 pm

Some really beefy bands getting going in those last few frames. Pretty impressive.
0 likes   
Colors of lost purpose on the canvas of irrelevance

Not a meteorologist, in fact more of an idiot than anything. You should probably check with the NHC or a local NWS office for official information.

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#242 Postby Aric Dunn » Tue Jul 21, 2020 2:12 pm

This is about to explode..
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

Shell Mound
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2434
Age: 32
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2017 3:39 pm
Location: St. Petersburg, FL → Scandinavia

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#243 Postby Shell Mound » Tue Jul 21, 2020 2:17 pm

The NHC is probably conservative because the system is clearly tilted due to easterly shear and the convective pattern has been generally “bursting” rather than consolidating. The latest IR isn’t terribly impressive, though the system is clearly holding its own through the diurnal minimum. Personally, I think some people tend to presume a system is more organised than it actually is. As of now this is a borderline TD, not a clear-cut case. One can make a 50/50 case for either an upgrade or retention. Perhaps the NHC is awaiting one more diurnal maximum before “pulling the trigger.” Honestly, I don’t have a problem with the NHC’s meteorological reasoning at this time.
3 likes   
CVW / MiamiensisWx / Shell Mound
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the NHC and NWS.

User avatar
cainjamin
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 168
Age: 34
Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2017 1:38 pm
Location: Nova Scotia, Canada

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#244 Postby cainjamin » Tue Jul 21, 2020 2:18 pm

Structure has definitely improved with more and more spiral banding. Convection isn't very deep at this point though. It will be really interesting to see what happens with DMAX overnight - if 99L can build a CDO tonight then the HWRF forecast becomes a little more reasonable. I think the best bet intensity-wise is still a moderate TS when it reaches the islands.
0 likes   
Noel '07, Kyle '08, Earl '10, Arthur '14, Dorian '19, Teddy '20, Lee '23

Shell Mound
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2434
Age: 32
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2017 3:39 pm
Location: St. Petersburg, FL → Scandinavia

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#245 Postby Shell Mound » Tue Jul 21, 2020 2:24 pm

cainjamin wrote:Structure has definitely improved with more and more spiral banding. Convection isn't very deep at this point though. It will be really interesting to see what happens with DMAX overnight - if 99L can build a CDO tonight then the HWRF forecast becomes a little more reasonable. I think the best bet intensity-wise is still a moderate TS when it reaches the islands.

Personally, I think the HWRF is far too aggressive. In most of these cases the ECMWF and/or the GFS tend to be more accurate, as they were with Erika ‘15. The HWRF, if I recall correctly, was consistently bullish with Erika while the EC/GFS correctly expected dissipation earlier than the NHC’s consensus-weighted forecast(s) anticipated. While the system could exceed expectations in the short term, increasing shear and SAL will overtake the system before it reaches the islands, so rapid degeneration by then is probable. One can already see that the HWRF is busting, since it presupposed faster organisation by now than is actually taking place. The convective scheme likely exaggerates vertical lift and convective processes.

 https://twitter.com/webberweather/status/1285626421763874817


Last edited by Shell Mound on Tue Jul 21, 2020 2:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.
2 likes   
CVW / MiamiensisWx / Shell Mound
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the NHC and NWS.

User avatar
GCANE
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 11453
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 8:03 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#246 Postby GCANE » Tue Jul 21, 2020 2:35 pm

A fast rising tower is popping up.
The updraft should create some good helicity and get the LL vort spinning up.

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
TheProfessor
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 3506
Age: 28
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 10:56 am
Location: Wichita, Kansas

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#247 Postby TheProfessor » Tue Jul 21, 2020 2:36 pm

Shell Mound wrote:
cainjamin wrote:Structure has definitely improved with more and more spiral banding. Convection isn't very deep at this point though. It will be really interesting to see what happens with DMAX overnight - if 99L can build a CDO tonight then the HWRF forecast becomes a little more reasonable. I think the best bet intensity-wise is still a moderate TS when it reaches the islands.

Personally, I think the HWRF is far too aggressive. In most of these cases the ECMWF and/or the GFS tend to be more accurate, as they were with Erika ‘15. The HWRF, if I recall correctly, was consistently bullish with Erika while the EC/GFS correctly expected dissipation earlier than the NHC’s consensus-weighted forecast(s) anticipated. While the system could exceed expectations in the short term, increasing shear and SAL will overtake the system before it reaches the islands, so rapid degeneration by then is probable. One can already see that the HWRF is busting, since it presupposed faster organisation by now than is actually taking place. The convective scheme likely exaggerates vertical lift and convective processes.


The HWRF is typically over aggressive, however it does do well with these small storms like Danny 2015. If dry air were the only obstacle with 99L I'd be more inclined to believe a hurricane could be possible, however with the current background state of the atmosphere being somewhat unfavorable in general I do think it's less likely the HWRF is right with this one. However if 99L can continue to produce convection and stay in a moisture pocket there's no reason why it can't become a hurricane while shear is low.
3 likes   
An alumnus of The Ohio State University.

Your local National Weather Service office is your best source for weather information.

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#248 Postby Aric Dunn » Tue Jul 21, 2020 2:37 pm

Big ole hot tower developing on the east side of the center wraping around.. these pulsing hot towers are incredibly normal and are increasing the mid level vorticity..

this latest one looks to set off some pretty explosive convection.
2 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

User avatar
northjaxpro
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 8900
Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2010 11:21 am
Location: Jacksonville, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#249 Postby northjaxpro » Tue Jul 21, 2020 2:46 pm

TheProfessor wrote:
Shell Mound wrote:
cainjamin wrote:Structure has definitely improved with more and more spiral banding. Convection isn't very deep at this point though. It will be really interesting to see what happens with DMAX overnight - if 99L can build a CDO tonight then the HWRF forecast becomes a little more reasonable. I think the best bet intensity-wise is still a moderate TS when it reaches the islands.

Personally, I think the HWRF is far too aggressive. In most of these cases the ECMWF and/or the GFS tend to be more accurate, as they were with Erika ‘15. The HWRF, if I recall correctly, was consistently bullish with Erika while the EC/GFS correctly expected dissipation earlier than the NHC’s consensus-weighted forecast(s) anticipated. While the system could exceed expectations in the short term, increasing shear and SAL will overtake the system before it reaches the islands, so rapid degeneration by then is probable. One can already see that the HWRF is busting, since it presupposed faster organisation by now than is actually taking place. The convective scheme likely exaggerates vertical lift and convective processes.


The HWRF is typically over aggressive, however it does do well with these small storms like Danny 2015. If dry air were the only obstacle with 99L I'd be more inclined to believe a hurricane could be possible, however with the current background state of the atmosphere being somewhat unfavorable in general I do think it's less likely the HWRF is right with this one. However if 99L can continue to produce convection and stay in a moisture pocket there's no reason why it can't become a hurricane while shear is low.


Precisely Professor. I always refer to Hurricane Danny in 2015 as well. I have already referred to it several times this season due to several small vorts developing this year, especially Edouard and Fay.

These small vorts like Danny in 2015 can create their own unique envionments,and are quute difficult for the reliable models to analyze them. Danny had only one model (HWRF) at the time to even develop it. It went on to become a major Cat 3 hurricane, albeit one of the smallest cyclones I can ever recall tracking and analyzing. Definitely among my all -time favorite cyclones through the years.
4 likes   
NEVER, EVER SAY NEVER in the tropics and weather in general, and most importantly, with life itself!!

________________________________________________________________________________________

Fay 2008 Beryl 2012 Debby 2012 Colin 2016 Hermine 2016 Julia 2016 Matthew 2016 Irma 2017 Dorian 2019

TheStormExpert

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#250 Postby TheStormExpert » Tue Jul 21, 2020 2:51 pm

Why doesn’t the NHC issue Potential Tropical Cyclone advisories anymore? I really don’t see the point of them releasing that option back in 2017 if they’re not going to efficiently take advantage of that option anymore.
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#251 Postby Aric Dunn » Tue Jul 21, 2020 2:53 pm

Image
9 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

User avatar
Extratropical94
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 3538
Age: 30
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2010 6:36 am
Location: Hamburg, Germany
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#252 Postby Extratropical94 » Tue Jul 21, 2020 2:54 pm

TheStormExpert wrote:Why doesn’t the NHC issue Potential Tropical Cyclone advisories anymore? I really don’t see the point of them releasing that option back in 2017 if they’re not going to efficiently take advantage of that option anymore.


Probably because the system doesn't pose a threat to any land areas in the next 48 hours.
6 likes   
54° 11' 59'' N, 9° 9' 20'' E
Boomer Sooner!
Go Broncos! Go Cards! Go Niners!
- Daniel

User avatar
EquusStorm
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1649
Age: 34
Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2013 1:04 pm
Location: Jasper, AL
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#253 Postby EquusStorm » Tue Jul 21, 2020 2:54 pm

I think the PTC designation is mostly for storms that have land impact of some sort within 48 hours or so but they haven't used them that often lately even when that's the case
6 likes   
Colors of lost purpose on the canvas of irrelevance

Not a meteorologist, in fact more of an idiot than anything. You should probably check with the NHC or a local NWS office for official information.

User avatar
GCANE
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 11453
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 8:03 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#254 Postby GCANE » Tue Jul 21, 2020 2:58 pm

Aric Dunn wrote:Big ole hot tower developing on the east side of the center wraping around.. these pulsing hot towers are incredibly normal and are increasing the mid level vorticity..

this latest one looks to set off some pretty explosive convection.


This one is not washing out so fast.
Actually, cloud tops are getting colder.
1 likes   

User avatar
drezee
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3664
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2003 12:49 pm
Location: FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#255 Postby drezee » Tue Jul 21, 2020 2:58 pm


Boomer going off. TS by 03z
1 likes   

User avatar
Cataegis96
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 54
Age: 29
Joined: Mon Jul 10, 2017 3:46 pm
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#256 Postby Cataegis96 » Tue Jul 21, 2020 2:59 pm

 https://twitter.com/TropicalTidbits/status/1285656782191370242




New Levi video soon. Certainly some portentous wording there. We may look back to this week as the beginning of when things started to take off when the 2020 season is all said and done.
5 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#257 Postby Aric Dunn » Tue Jul 21, 2020 3:03 pm

GCANE wrote:
Aric Dunn wrote:Big ole hot tower developing on the east side of the center wraping around.. these pulsing hot towers are incredibly normal and are increasing the mid level vorticity..

this latest one looks to set off some pretty explosive convection.


This one is not washing out so fast.
Actually, cloud tops are getting colder.


Yeah, there were a bunch of smaller towers today and a few finally were able to wrap around a few hours ago and close off the moisture loop. I knew this was coming.


and it is on the Se/E side.. very indicative..
1 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

User avatar
tarheelprogrammer
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1793
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2016 9:25 pm
Location: Raleigh, NC area (Garner, NC)

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#258 Postby tarheelprogrammer » Tue Jul 21, 2020 3:06 pm

I believe this is now a low-end TS. I think this could surprise the Leewards. :eek:
2 likes   
My posts are not official forecasts. They are just my opinion and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
ouragans
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 481
Age: 53
Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2011 12:09 pm
Location: Abymes, Guadeloupe F.W.I
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#259 Postby ouragans » Tue Jul 21, 2020 3:07 pm

TheStormExpert wrote:Why doesn’t the NHC issue Potential Tropical Cyclone advisories anymore? I really don’t see the point of them releasing that option back in 2017 if they’re not going to efficiently take advantage of that option anymore.

PTC is when a system is 48 hrs or less from land with watches/warnings need to be issued for that territory. 99L is too far from the islands
4 likes   
Personal forecast disclaimer
This post is a personal point of view, not an information. Please refer to official statements for life-threatening decisions.

David '79, Frederic '79, Hugo '89, Iris, Luis & Marilyn '95, Georges '98, Lenny '99, Dean '07, Irma '17, Maria '17, Fiona '22, Philippe '23, Tammy '23
16°13'33.3,"6N -61°36'39.5"W

User avatar
tiger_deF
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 468
Age: 24
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2016 11:47 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#260 Postby tiger_deF » Tue Jul 21, 2020 3:09 pm

I've seen way more speculation about the wave behind 99L than 99L itself but tbh I think that this has a chance to be an immediate threat to the windward islands. While it will be fighting some drier air, not only will a stronger stacked system be more resilient to dry air, but SST's are running well above average ahead of it, and we could see a real threat to the Antilles and maybe even the CONUS.
0 likes   


Return to “2020”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 25 guests