ConvergenceZone wrote:And to think, she still has all day tomorrow to get even stronger, yikes!
Both HWRF and HMON strengthen this until landfall occurs sometime on Saturday so that’s plenty of time over very warm water.
Moderator: S2k Moderators
ConvergenceZone wrote:And to think, she still has all day tomorrow to get even stronger, yikes!
supercane4867 wrote:ConvergenceZone wrote:And to think, she still has all day tomorrow to get even stronger, yikes!
Both HWRF and HMON strengthen this until landfall occurs sometime on Saturday so that’s plenty of time over very warm water.
GCANE wrote:Come on Miss Piggy Radar
abk_0710 wrote:hicksta wrote:Wonder how the strengthening will affect the overall track
I was also wondering this.
Aric Dunn wrote:GCANE wrote:Come on Miss Piggy Radar
Is there anywhere we can still get the radar images from the noaa plane ? we used to be able to on atlantic recon.
NXStumpy_Robothing wrote:abk_0710 wrote:hicksta wrote:Wonder how the strengthening will affect the overall track
I was also wondering this.
From what I've seen, a stronger system will be able to travel slightly further north before landfall - seems like regardless of where this occurs, the system will then head WSW.
Not many models are picking up on this being incredibly strong, and we still need to wait for recon before jumping the gun.
GCANE wrote:ozonepete wrote:GCANE wrote:Anti-cyclone right on top of this.
Its all there, spinning up.
https://i.imgur.com/JaIvz83.gif
Yes, GCANE, this chart plus your other recent comments about outflow are on the money. You can see the outflow developing rapidly in almost all quadrants now if you watch the visible loops. It's that upper level venting with no inhibition at the lower levels plus good mid-level RH that will get this ramping really fast tonight. RI is quite possible. Hurricane is quite possible now.
Much thanks Ozonepete. I hope all is well with you and you and your family are staying healthy.
GCANE wrote:NXStumpy_Robothing wrote:abk_0710 wrote:
I was also wondering this.
From what I've seen, a stronger system will be able to travel slightly further north before landfall - seems like regardless of where this occurs, the system will then head WSW.
Not many models are picking up on this being incredibly strong, and we still need to wait for recon before jumping the gun.
I noted this a few days ago.
Somehow the models are being fed with totally bogus data.
I compared current GFS conditions with multiple observations and it was way off for many parameters.
Forget the models.
ozonepete wrote:GCANE wrote:ozonepete wrote:
Yes, GCANE, this chart plus your other recent comments about outflow are on the money. You can see the outflow developing rapidly in almost all quadrants now if you watch the visible loops. It's that upper level venting with no inhibition at the lower levels plus good mid-level RH that will get this ramping really fast tonight. RI is quite possible. Hurricane is quite possible now.
Much thanks Ozonepete. I hope all is well with you and you and your family are staying healthy.Thanks! Always good to "see" you here. All is well here and I hope the same with you.
Back on topic, this one bothers me because it has both the ingredients necessary for RI and that "look" of a storm about to explode. One is the pure science and the other is more gut. Hope I'm wrong on both counts.
SoupBone wrote:GCANE wrote:NXStumpy_Robothing wrote:From what I've seen, a stronger system will be able to travel slightly further north before landfall - seems like regardless of where this occurs, the system will then head WSW.
Not many models are picking up on this being incredibly strong, and we still need to wait for recon before jumping the gun.
I noted this a few days ago.
Somehow the models are being fed with totally bogus data.
I compared current GFS conditions with multiple observations and it was way off for many parameters.
Forget the models.
This is a very loaded statement. You have proof of this?
Stormcenter wrote:Well if this does end up blowing up into
a significant storm then I guess that’s what
happens when you treat everything the models
spit out as the gospel.
GCANE wrote:SoupBone wrote:GCANE wrote:
I noted this a few days ago.
Somehow the models are being fed with totally bogus data.
I compared current GFS conditions with multiple observations and it was way off for many parameters.
Forget the models.
This is a very loaded statement. You have proof of this?
Yes, there was graphics I posted. I'll try and dig it up, it should be with 99L.
zhukm29 wrote:The models do rely on data from commercial flights, so it makes sense they are struggling a bit more than usual because of COVID.
Why did it have to be this year though...
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests