ATL: ISAIAS - Post-Tropical - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23689
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#121 Postby gatorcane » Sun Jul 26, 2020 6:56 am

Not looking too great because of the SAL as expected. Development looks to be slow and gradual. The very favorable conditions might have to wait until after is passes the islands. The GFS may be much too aggressive in deepening this, siding more with the Euro here.
4 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 143867
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#122 Postby cycloneye » Sun Jul 26, 2020 7:09 am

Is moving fast and that will delay development at it approaches the Lesser Antilles. Hopefully it stays as it is now and bring needed rains to Puerto Rico and the U.S Virgin Islands that are going thru a severe drought.
7 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
CourierPR
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1335
Age: 71
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 7:53 pm
Location: Pompano Beach, Florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#123 Postby CourierPR » Sun Jul 26, 2020 7:10 am

gatorcane wrote:Not looking too great because of the SAL as expected. Development looks to be slow and gradual. The very favorable conditions might have to wait until after is passes the islands. The GFS may be much too aggressive in deepening this, siding more with the Euro here.



I will side with the NHC at 60% and 90%.
4 likes   

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23689
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#124 Postby gatorcane » Sun Jul 26, 2020 7:11 am

CourierPR wrote:
gatorcane wrote:Not looking too great because of the SAL as expected. Development looks to be slow and gradual. The very favorable conditions might have to wait until after is passes the islands. The GFS may be much too aggressive in deepening this, siding more with the Euro here.



I will side with the NHC at 60% and 90%.


I am not saying it won’t develop in the next 5 days but significant development (if any) may have to wait a bit longer
3 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 143867
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#125 Postby cycloneye » Sun Jul 26, 2020 7:15 am

5 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 143867
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#126 Postby cycloneye » Sun Jul 26, 2020 7:55 am

12z Best Track:

AL, 92, 2020072612, , BEST, 0, 113N, 360W, 20, 1010, DB, 34, NEQ, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1012, 120, 50, 0, 0, L, 0, , 0, 0, INVEST, M, 0, , 0, 0, 0, 0, genesis-num, 021,


Image
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

Shell Mound
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2434
Age: 32
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2017 3:39 pm
Location: St. Petersburg, FL → Scandinavia

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#127 Postby Shell Mound » Sun Jul 26, 2020 8:08 am

gatorcane wrote:
CourierPR wrote:
gatorcane wrote:Not looking too great because of the SAL as expected. Development looks to be slow and gradual. The very favorable conditions might have to wait until after is passes the islands. The GFS may be much too aggressive in deepening this, siding more with the Euro here.



I will side with the NHC at 60% and 90%.


I am not saying it won’t develop in the next 5 days but significant development (if any) may have to wait a bit longer

Aside from the SAL surge to the north and west, conditions are actually quite conducive now. Vertical wind shear is relatively low, outflow is well established, and low-level vorticity, however broad, is vigorous and evident on visible satellite imagery. Additionally, 92L is in close proximity to the ITCZ, so ample PWATs exist nearby. One can already see convection attempting to develop near the vorticity maximum during the diurnal minimum. Once a low-level centre becomes established, I would not be surprised to see steady, even rapid, intensification within the next five days, especially once 92L approaches the Lesser Antilles.

Not exactly sure as to why people are leaning toward the “bearish” side in regard to 92L’s short-term development...
Last edited by Shell Mound on Sun Jul 26, 2020 8:12 am, edited 1 time in total.
4 likes   
CVW / MiamiensisWx / Shell Mound
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the NHC and NWS.

Frank2
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4061
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 12:47 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#128 Postby Frank2 » Sun Jul 26, 2020 8:10 am

https://www.star.nesdis.noaa.gov/GOES/s ... &length=24

Nice view of 92L and the accompanying dust and dry air.

It seems strong waves exiting the mainland cause some SAL outbreaks, or at least strengthen them - the chicken or the egg question...
2 likes   

User avatar
drezee
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3664
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2003 12:49 pm
Location: FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#129 Postby drezee » Sun Jul 26, 2020 8:27 am

7 likes   

User avatar
toad strangler
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4543
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 3:09 pm
Location: Earth
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#130 Postby toad strangler » Sun Jul 26, 2020 8:53 am

6 likes   

User avatar
MetroMike
Category 4
Category 4
Posts: 941
Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2004 8:13 pm
Location: Tampa Bay
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#131 Postby MetroMike » Sun Jul 26, 2020 9:01 am



I will go with I-zay-us keep it simple to say.
3 likes   

User avatar
NDG
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 15445
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 10:14 pm
Location: Orlando, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#132 Postby NDG » Sun Jul 26, 2020 9:01 am

gatorcane wrote:Not looking too great because of the SAL as expected. Development looks to be slow and gradual. The very favorable conditions might have to wait until after is passes the islands. The GFS may be much too aggressive in deepening this, siding more with the Euro here.


The GFS so far has a bad track record in the last few days in its medium range forecast, horrible is the word.
3 likes   

User avatar
eastcoastFL
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3900
Age: 43
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2007 12:29 pm
Location: Palm City, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#133 Postby eastcoastFL » Sun Jul 26, 2020 9:18 am

Can anyone tell me where the circulation is on this one? I feel like I see two different circulations but I’m sure that’s not correct...


Image
3 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

USTropics
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2635
Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2007 3:45 am
Location: Florida State University

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#134 Postby USTropics » Sun Jul 26, 2020 9:26 am

Unfortunately lead time for genesis hasn't been great from the operational global models this season. The GFS forecast at 72 hours has been, let's say, lacking.

72 hour forecast for Gonzalo on the 19th:
Image

What actually happened 3 days later:
Image

I'd give it a pass on Gonzalo given the system's size/background state, but Hanna was even worse:

72 hour forecast for Hanna on the 23rd:
Image

What actually happened 3 days later:
Image

Ensembles and biases/trends become even more important with the low lead time by the globals this season (and this is seen in other basins as well, not just an Atlantic issue).
Last edited by USTropics on Sun Jul 26, 2020 9:27 am, edited 1 time in total.
9 likes   

User avatar
toad strangler
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4543
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 3:09 pm
Location: Earth
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#135 Postby toad strangler » Sun Jul 26, 2020 9:26 am

92L is one potent looking wave.
1 likes   

User avatar
toad strangler
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4543
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 3:09 pm
Location: Earth
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#136 Postby toad strangler » Sun Jul 26, 2020 9:31 am

USTropics wrote:Unfortunately lead time for genesis hasn't been great from the operational global models this season. The GFS forecast at 72 hours has been, let's say, lacking.

72 hour forecast for Gonzalo on the 19th:

What actually happened 3 days later:

I'd give it a pass on Gonzalo given the system's size/background state, but Hanna was even worse:

72 hour forecast for Hanna on the 23rd:

What actually happened 3 days later:

Ensembles and biases/trends become even more important with the low lead time by the globals this season (and this is seen in other basins as well, not just an Atlantic issue).



ooof that's a huge swing and miss on Hanna. #nogood
0 likes   

TheStormExpert

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#137 Postby TheStormExpert » Sun Jul 26, 2020 9:33 am

0 likes   

jlauderdal
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 7177
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:46 am
Location: NE Fort Lauderdale
Contact:

Re: RE: Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#138 Postby jlauderdal » Sun Jul 26, 2020 9:38 am

TheStormExpert wrote:Emily 2011 anyone?

 https://twitter.com/derekortt/status/1287276547343351809


How could i forget how poorly the models handled emily 2011

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk
0 likes   

USTropics
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2635
Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2007 3:45 am
Location: Florida State University

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#139 Postby USTropics » Sun Jul 26, 2020 9:46 am

This is not just a GFS issue either, the ECMWF 72 hour operational forecast has also been suspect (in multiple basins now):

00z forecast on July 19 for Gonzalo:
Image

What actually happened 3 days later:
Image

00z forecast on July 23 for Hanna:
Image

What actually happened:
Image
12 likes   

User avatar
aspen
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8812
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 7:10 pm
Location: Connecticut, USA

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#140 Postby aspen » Sun Jul 26, 2020 10:17 am

Since the GFS and Euro have been so bad with the development of Gonzalo and Hanna, and those issues definitely won’t magically correct themselves for 92L just days afterwards, it’s probably likely that the actual future of 92L will be very different. Two broad possibilities seem the most plausible:

1.) the complete opposite of Gonzalo and Hanna happens — 92L fails to develop despite strong model support and either rams into the Greater Antilles or becomes Gonzalo 2.0, gulping SAL and limping its way to its deathbed.

2.) 92L exceeds expectations and becomes a stronger system than any of the models were anticipating, either on the same track they’re now showing or on a Caribbean Cruiser track.

I wouldn’t rule out a Gonzalo Sequel from 92L, mainly because it’s still late July and not late August (regardless of what 2020 thinks), but as I mentioned yesterday, I find a complete bust hard to believe when systems have been developing out of the blue. If models are showing something strong for once, then there’s a good chance they’re at least somewhat right.
7 likes   
Irene '11 Sandy '12 Hermine '16 5/15/2018 Derecho Fay '20 Isaias '20 Elsa '21 Henri '21 Ida '21

I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.


Return to “2020”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 27 guests