ATL: ISAIAS - Post-Tropical - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
USTropics
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 2651
Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2007 3:45 am
Location: Florida State University

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#561 Postby USTropics » Mon Jul 27, 2020 11:24 pm

Dolly 2008:
Image

Irene 2011:
Image
3 likes   

User avatar
Hurricaneman
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 7351
Age: 45
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 3:24 pm
Location: central florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#562 Postby Hurricaneman » Mon Jul 27, 2020 11:34 pm

My new thoughts after the new model suite

I believe a track through the NE Lesser Antilles and just north of Puerto Rico and Hispaniola seems most likely and a track through the Bahamas and into Cocoa Beach Fl is my best guess heading north to the Carolinas

As for intensity I think I was too aggressive and am more in line with the models

24hrs TS. 40mph
48hrs. TS. 65mph
72hrs. TS. 70mph
96hrs. TS. 65mph
120hrs TS 50mph
144hrs TS. 65mph

Next forecast 11am
1 likes   

User avatar
Hammy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5849
Age: 41
Joined: Fri May 25, 2012 5:25 pm
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#563 Postby Hammy » Mon Jul 27, 2020 11:38 pm

tiger_deF wrote:Can anyone think of another invest that looked even remotely like this one in this location? Not only is it absolutely massive, but it has a vigor that I've never seen, and has been tapping into moisture streams all the way from the equator. With the current climatology and amount of dry air that was around this system, I think that any smaller wave would have been completely consumed.


A bit late to answer but I found four in particular came to mind (there were probably others but I'd have to go into the 1980s to look)--Bonnie, 1998 spanning from 7N to 18N; a non-developing wave in 2000 spanning from about 5N to 18N (listed as a TD in my log nonetheless), Irene in 2011, spanning from 5N to 17N, and Cristobal in 2014 spanning from 5N to 20N and taking a similar track that this one is expected to (that one finally developed in the Bahamas, under similar circumstances, interacting with a PV streamer and going out to sea)

Image

Image

Interestingly 75% of them developed which matches 92L's development chances. :D
9 likes   
The above post is not official and should not be used as such. It is the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is not endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
CyclonicFury
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2025
Age: 26
Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2017 12:32 pm
Location: NC
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#564 Postby CyclonicFury » Mon Jul 27, 2020 11:44 pm

Hammy wrote:
tiger_deF wrote:Can anyone think of another invest that looked even remotely like this one in this location? Not only is it absolutely massive, but it has a vigor that I've never seen, and has been tapping into moisture streams all the way from the equator. With the current climatology and amount of dry air that was around this system, I think that any smaller wave would have been completely consumed.


A bit late to answer but I found four in particular came to mind (there were probably others but I'd have to go into the 1980s to look)--Bonnie, 1998 spanning from 7N to 18N; a non-developing wave in 2000 spanning from about 5N to 18N (listed as a TD in my log nonetheless), Irene in 2011, spanning from 5N to 17N, and Cristobal in 2014 spanning from 5N to 20N and taking a similar track that this one is expected to (that one finally developed in the Bahamas, under similar circumstances, interacting with a PV streamer and going out to sea)

https://i.imgur.com/Tlzn5Oo.png

https://i.imgur.com/DjJTAP0.png

Interestingly 75% of them developed which matches 92L's development chances. :D

These large waves tend to happen most commonly in late July/August when the West African Monsoon is near peak. During September, when the WAM starts to retreat, it seems like the TWs become more compact, allowing more of them to develop.
2 likes   
NCSU B.S. in Meteorology Class of 2021. Tropical weather blogger at http://www.cyclonicfury.com. My forecasts and thoughts are NOT official, for official forecasts please consult the National Hurricane Center.

User avatar
Hammy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5849
Age: 41
Joined: Fri May 25, 2012 5:25 pm
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#565 Postby Hammy » Mon Jul 27, 2020 11:55 pm

CyclonicFury wrote:
Hammy wrote:
tiger_deF wrote:Can anyone think of another invest that looked even remotely like this one in this location? Not only is it absolutely massive, but it has a vigor that I've never seen, and has been tapping into moisture streams all the way from the equator. With the current climatology and amount of dry air that was around this system, I think that any smaller wave would have been completely consumed.


A bit late to answer but I found four in particular came to mind (there were probably others but I'd have to go into the 1980s to look)--Bonnie, 1998 spanning from 7N to 18N; a non-developing wave in 2000 spanning from about 5N to 18N (listed as a TD in my log nonetheless), Irene in 2011, spanning from 5N to 17N, and Cristobal in 2014 spanning from 5N to 20N and taking a similar track that this one is expected to (that one finally developed in the Bahamas, under similar circumstances, interacting with a PV streamer and going out to sea)

https://i.imgur.com/Tlzn5Oo.png

https://i.imgur.com/DjJTAP0.png

Interestingly 75% of them developed which matches 92L's development chances. :D


These large waves tend to happen most commonly in late July/August when the West African Monsoon is near peak. During September, when the WAM starts to retreat, it seems like the TWs become more compact, allowing more of them to develop.


Something of note that I just realized is all four instances preceded a burst of waves developing by a few weeks--1998 was August 18 and we had a burst in mid-September with Georges, Ivan, and Jeanne; 2000 was around September 7 and there was a burst around late September with Isaac and Joyce along with several stronger waves (but it was getting into October by this point so upper conditions were decreasing), 2011 was Aug 19 which was followed similarly to 2000 by Ophelia and Philippe before the MDR shut down in October; and despite 2014 being very quiet overall, we saw long-tracking Edouard along with a few other strong waves (eaten by shear) about three weeks after Cristobal's massive precursor wave.

Not that it means much having only four examples, but some food for thought.

Edit: Just scrolled up, I'm not the only one that thought of Irene by the looks of it.
1 likes   
The above post is not official and should not be used as such. It is the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is not endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
NotSparta
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 1670
Age: 23
Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2017 8:24 am
Location: Naples, FL
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#566 Postby NotSparta » Tue Jul 28, 2020 12:04 am

Chances back up to 80/90

NHC wrote:Shower activity associated with a low pressure area located about
750 miles east of the Windward Islands is gradually increasing
in organization. However, recent satellite-derived wind data
indicate that the circulation remains broad and elongated, and the
low does not yet have a well-defined center of circulation.
Environmental conditions are expected to become somewhat more
conducive for development, and a tropical depression or tropical
storm is likely to form during the next couple of days while the
system moves west-northwestward at 15 to 20 mph and approaches the
Leeward Islands. Regardless of development, locally heavy rains and
gusty winds are likely across portions of the Leeward Islands on
Wednesday and will spread westward to the Virgin Islands and Puerto
Rico Wednesday night and Thursday. Interests on these islands
should continue to monitor the progress of this system, and
tropical storm watches or warnings could be required for portions
of the area later today.
* Formation chance through 48 hours...high...80 percent.
* Formation chance through 5 days...high...90 percent.
5 likes   
This post was probably an opinion of mine, and in no way is official. Please refer to http://www.hurricanes.gov for official tropical analysis and advisories.

My website, with lots of tropical wx graphics, including satellite and recon: http://cyclonicwx.com

User avatar
Hammy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5849
Age: 41
Joined: Fri May 25, 2012 5:25 pm
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#567 Postby Hammy » Tue Jul 28, 2020 12:11 am

They really need to issue PTC advisories at this point, given the size and intensity forecasts this will almost certainly go through the Caribbean at mid-range storm intensity even if it hasn't technically developed yet.
1 likes   
The above post is not official and should not be used as such. It is the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is not endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
HurricaneAndre2008
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 335
Age: 27
Joined: Wed Jul 31, 2019 9:51 pm
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#568 Postby HurricaneAndre2008 » Tue Jul 28, 2020 12:47 am

Image
0 likes   
Cindy(2005), Katrina(2005), Rita(2005), Erin(2007), Isaac(2012)

User avatar
CM2
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 103
Joined: Sun Jul 26, 2020 2:41 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#569 Postby CM2 » Tue Jul 28, 2020 1:09 am

So after all the talk about 92L possible not being a storm, the ECMWF, HMON, and HWRF have all radically changing their stances and now have a pretty damn strong storm for the 00z run and a FAR western turn. I believe this kind of flips everything on it's head. Now we're talking about a cat 2/3 off the shore of Miami and potentionally hitting the Bahamas stright on. Jesus.


0 likes   
Large Signatures are for losers.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the NHC and NWS.

AxaltaRacing24
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1753
Age: 25
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2016 11:14 am
Location: Jupiter, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#570 Postby AxaltaRacing24 » Tue Jul 28, 2020 1:43 am

CM2 wrote:So after all the talk about 92L possible not being a storm, the ECMWF, HMON, and HWRF have all radically changing their stances and now have a pretty damn strong storm for the 00z run and a FAR western turn. I believe this kind of flips everything on it's head. Now we're talking about a cat 2/3 off the shore of Miami and potentionally hitting the Bahamas stright on. Jesus.
https://imgur.com/XA3Kv9n
https://imgur.com/Ssb7Xcv
https://imgur.com/WMvj2dV

As I said earlier, I have not seen the models this bad since I joined this forum in 2016.

This is not much better than 2000s modeling.
2 likes   

User avatar
CM2
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 103
Joined: Sun Jul 26, 2020 2:41 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#571 Postby CM2 » Tue Jul 28, 2020 1:44 am

AxaltaRacing24 wrote:
CM2 wrote:So after all the talk about 92L possible not being a storm, the ECMWF, HMON, and HWRF have all radically changing their stances and now have a pretty damn strong storm for the 00z run and a FAR western turn. I believe this kind of flips everything on it's head. Now we're talking about a cat 2/3 off the shore of Miami and potentionally hitting the Bahamas stright on. Jesus.
https://imgur.com/XA3Kv9n
https://imgur.com/Ssb7Xcv
https://imgur.com/WMvj2dV

As I said earlier, I have not seen the models this bad since I joined this forum in 2016.

This is not much better than 2000s modeling.

I did make a public decry that the models are all officially Bananas. Still even in that case the trend is important because changes between runs do occur for a reason (I hope.)
1 likes   
Large Signatures are for losers.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the NHC and NWS.

Shell Mound
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2434
Age: 32
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2017 3:39 pm
Location: St. Petersburg, FL → Scandinavia

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#572 Postby Shell Mound » Tue Jul 28, 2020 1:53 am

3 likes   
CVW / MiamiensisWx / Shell Mound
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the NHC and NWS.

Hurricane Mike
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 644
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2018 7:44 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#573 Postby Hurricane Mike » Tue Jul 28, 2020 2:47 am

2 likes   

User avatar
GCANE
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 11497
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 8:03 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#574 Postby GCANE » Tue Jul 28, 2020 3:03 am

This is essentially a broad gyre with a massive amount of entrained moisture (high TPW air).
Interaction with one of the small islands or a brush with PR could consolidate a low-level vort due to boundary layer frictional effects.
Basically creating a meso-scale convergence.
It'll likely move into the Bahamas and under an anti-cyclone.
IMHO, we could see more development then.
Last edited by GCANE on Tue Jul 28, 2020 3:18 am, edited 1 time in total.
5 likes   

User avatar
GCANE
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 11497
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 8:03 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#575 Postby GCANE » Tue Jul 28, 2020 3:18 am

A below the belt blow?

GFS is hinting at the possibility that if this doesn't develop in the Bahamas or remains weak, the wave will continue west, consolidate in the W Carib and move into the GOM with possible development.

At this point, its a TX / LA landfall.

Looks like one way or the other, something is going to happen.

Image

Image
2 likes   

User avatar
GCANE
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 11497
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 8:03 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#576 Postby GCANE » Tue Jul 28, 2020 3:27 am

GCANE wrote:This is essentially a broad gyre with a massive amount of entrained moisture (high TPW air).
Interaction with one of the small islands or a brush with PR could consolidate a low-level vort due to boundary layer frictional effects.
Basically creating a meso-scale convergence.
It'll likely move into the Bahamas and under an anti-cyclone.
IMHO, we could see more development then.


All the globals are on this scenario.
Its basically a given.

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
GCANE
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 11497
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 8:03 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#577 Postby GCANE » Tue Jul 28, 2020 3:28 am

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
STRiZZY
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 276
Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2016 6:01 pm
Location: Largo, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#578 Postby STRiZZY » Tue Jul 28, 2020 3:36 am

GCANE wrote:A below the belt blow?

GFS is hinting at the possibility that if this doesn't develop in the Bahamas or remains weak, the wave will continue west, consolidate in the W Carib and move into the GOM with possible development.

At this point, its a TX / LA landfall.

Looks like one way or the other, something is going to happen.

https://i.imgur.com/Pi5TtWn.png

https://i.imgur.com/LPzf8M4.png


The GFS takes 92l through the Bahamas and runs it up the FLA/GA/SC coast. I think the system hitting LA at 300hr isn't a part of 92l.

Image
You can see what becomes of 92l off the FL space coast and the system that ends up hitting LA is NW of Jamaica, S of Cuba on this vorticity map.
2 likes   

User avatar
GCANE
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 11497
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 8:03 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#579 Postby GCANE » Tue Jul 28, 2020 3:48 am

STRiZZY wrote:
GCANE wrote:A below the belt blow?

GFS is hinting at the possibility that if this doesn't develop in the Bahamas or remains weak, the wave will continue west, consolidate in the W Carib and move into the GOM with possible development.

At this point, its a TX / LA landfall.

Looks like one way or the other, something is going to happen.

https://i.imgur.com/Pi5TtWn.png

https://i.imgur.com/LPzf8M4.png


The GFS takes 92l through the Bahamas and runs it up the FLA/GA/SC coast. I think the system hitting LA at 300hr isn't a part of 92l.

https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysis/models/gfs/2020072800/gfs_z850_vort_watl_35.png
You can see what becomes of 92l off the FL space coast and the system that ends up hitting LA is NW of Jamaica, S of Cuba on this vorticity map.



Its the remnant of the wave currently associated with 92L.
Follow the MSLP & PWAT forecast.
PWAT is the same as TPW. Its what you would see on CIMSS's MIMIC-TPW.

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
GCANE
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 11497
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 8:03 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#580 Postby GCANE » Tue Jul 28, 2020 3:57 am

GFS is keeping this weak in the Bahamas due to the fact it'll be running into an UL Jet from a Rossby wave over the Midwest.
The Rossby Wave (Jet Stream) is the one creating the trof that will make it lift and recurve.
The closer it gets to the Rossby wave, the weaker it gets and the possibility of a GoM system increases.
If it slows down, it'll remain more under the Anticyclone Rossby Wave Break and develop stronger, which lessens the chance of a GoM TC.

Image

Image
3 likes   


Return to “2020”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests