ATL: ISAIAS - Post-Tropical - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
Do_For_Love
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 271
Age: 35
Joined: Sat May 09, 2015 7:47 am
Location: Delaware

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#601 Postby Do_For_Love » Tue Jul 28, 2020 7:06 am

The storm still seems to be moving pretty much W to me on the IR, when is it supposed to start getting a N motion? I guess today if it starts circulating it's western lobe? Some models had this thing going north of PR, I thought.
1 likes   
Irene '11, Sandy '12, Fay '20, Isaias '20, Ida '21

USTropics
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 2651
Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2007 3:45 am
Location: Florida State University

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#602 Postby USTropics » Tue Jul 28, 2020 7:07 am

No confirmation on an LLC looks like the only thing holding them back from going right to TS:

ZCZC MIATWOAT ALL
TTAA00 KNHC DDHHMM

Tropical Weather Outlook
NWS National Hurricane Center Miami FL
800 AM EDT Tue Jul 28 2020

For the North Atlantic...Caribbean Sea and the Gulf of Mexico:

1. An elongated area of low pressure located about 500 miles east of
the Windward Islands is producing a wide area of showers and
thunderstorms. Although recent satellite imagery suggests that the
system does not yet have a well-defined center, data from NOAA buoy
41040 indicate that the system is producing winds near
tropical-storm-force.
An Air Force Reserve Hurricane Hunter aircraft
is scheduled to investigate the system this afternoon and will
provide more information about the current state of the disturbance.

Environmental conditions are expected to be conducive for additional
development and a tropical depression or tropical storm is likely to
form during the next couple of days while the system moves
west-northwestward at 15 to 20 mph and approaches the Leeward
Islands. Regardless of development, locally heavy rain is likely
across portions of the Lesser Antilles beginning later today and
continuing through Wednesday, especially in the Leeward Islands.
These conditions will spread westward to the Virgin Islands and
Puerto Rico Wednesday night and Thursday. Interests on these islands
should continue to monitor the progress of this system and tropical
storm watches or warnings could be required for portions of the area
later today.
* Formation chance through 48 hours...high...80 percent.
* Formation chance through 5 days...high...90 percent.

Forecaster Zelinsky
2 likes   

User avatar
Weatherboy1
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1189
Age: 49
Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2004 1:50 pm
Location: Jupiter/Sarasota, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#603 Postby Weatherboy1 » Tue Jul 28, 2020 7:14 am

Latest TWO strongly suggests to me they're on the cusp of designating this … and when they do, it could jump right to TS vs. TD. So, we're going to go straight to watches/warnings IF it does consolidate its LLC. And given the fast motion and fast projected motion, we could have the 5-day cone enveloping part of Florida right off the bat - or be very, very close to that. Going to be interesting to see what happens today.
2 likes   

Shell Mound
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2434
Age: 32
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2017 3:39 pm
Location: St. Petersburg, FL → Scandinavia

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#604 Postby Shell Mound » Tue Jul 28, 2020 7:14 am

Shell Mound wrote:If the southwestern lobe manages to become dominant, then the weaker, northeastern lobe, combined with the TUTT, could drag 92L/Isaias a bit farther north as it nears the northeastern Caribbean, especially if current trends continue and the SW lobe manages to consolidate faster within the next day or so. As angular momentum transfers to the southwestern lobe, the weakening, northeastern lobe rotates counterclockwise around the dominant lobe, while the circulation (wave axis) begins to align at the middle and upper levels. As the deepening system interacts with the TUTT near the islands, the dominant, southern lobe will still be drawn northward, then begin to push the TUTT away by days three through five, given an early start on development within the next twenty-four to thirty-six hours. So 92L/Isaias could still manage to avoid the larger islands of the Greater Antilles and instead interact with Puerto Rico and the Leewards at most (prior to the Bahamas, of course). Given current trends toward a slower, deeper shortwave trough over the southern Plains, a stronger 92L/Isaias could reinforce the stronger ridging to its north via diabetic outflow, which also serves to weaken the nearby TUTT, primarily by days three through five. This would imply a greater threat to FL/GA and perhaps the extreme eastern Gulf of Mexico. Current trends on satellite definitely suggest imminent development, with widespread deep convection persisting through the early diurnal minimum. For once the GFS-Parallel and the HWRF may be onto something.

Another important factor to consider: given the trend toward a more amplified NHEM pattern over the next three to five days, if 92L/Isaias manages to complete its current organisational cycle, (convectively) consolidate in the vicinity of its SW lobe, and intensify over the next day and a half, then the currently “unfavourable” environment north of the islands and near the Bahamas could rapidly become conducive to intensification. If a stronger 92L/Isaias in the short term would be better able to fend off the TUTT, especially given its sprawling circulation, then it could find itself in a very favourable environment as it nears the Southeastern U.S., especially FL/GA: as the TUTT splits, the trend toward a deeper, slower shortwave over the southern Plains will also favour UL divergence/anticyclonic flow over/near the Bahamas, in the vicinity of near-record TCHP. As we saw with Hanna, perhaps 92L/Isaias could then intensify much more than expected within a day or two of impacting the Southeastern U.S.—on short notice and with little prior indication from global models. This should be watched very closely.
6 likes   
CVW / MiamiensisWx / Shell Mound
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the NHC and NWS.

User avatar
SouthDadeFish
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 2835
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2010 2:54 pm
Location: Miami, FL
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#605 Postby SouthDadeFish » Tue Jul 28, 2020 7:17 am

I don't understand why NHC isn't issuing advisories for a Potential Tropical Cyclone. The Antilles are within range of watches/warnings. My guess is the NHC is waiting until they feel more confident where a center will consolidate. Possibly after the recon flight today, if recon doesn't find a TC already.
12 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#606 Postby Aric Dunn » Tue Jul 28, 2020 7:20 am

SouthDadeFish wrote:I don't understand why NHC isn't issuing advisories for a Potential Tropical Cyclone. The Antilles are within range of watches/warnings. My guess is the NHC is waiting until they feel more confident where a center will consolidate. Possibly after the recon flight today, if recon doesn't find a TC already.


I was wondering the same thing...

except what about Barbados ... if they wait for Recon... Barbados will already be getting into the think of things..
6 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

User avatar
Emmett_Brown
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1432
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 9:10 pm
Location: Sarasota FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#607 Postby Emmett_Brown » Tue Jul 28, 2020 7:20 am

That TUTT is not very strong and it's retrograding W at a similar speed as 92L, so it could enhance outflow instead of shearing the system. Land interaction is the main inhibitor.
5 likes   

RT23
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 65
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2017 2:21 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#608 Postby RT23 » Tue Jul 28, 2020 7:21 am

SouthDadeFish wrote:I don't understand why NHC isn't issuing advisories for a Potential Tropical Cyclone. The Antilles are within range of watches/warnings. My guess is the NHC is waiting until they feel more confident where a center will consolidate. Possibly after the recon flight today, if recon doesn't find a TC already.

I am also concerned that they have not, the proximity to the islands shouldve prompted at least TS watches at this time. The sys looks to be consolidated in the west more than the east this am and maybe i am wrong but there appeared to be a slight sw movement earlier.
2 likes   

AutoPenalti
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4030
Age: 29
Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2015 4:16 pm
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, Florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#609 Postby AutoPenalti » Tue Jul 28, 2020 7:24 am

RT23 wrote:
SouthDadeFish wrote:I don't understand why NHC isn't issuing advisories for a Potential Tropical Cyclone. The Antilles are within range of watches/warnings. My guess is the NHC is waiting until they feel more confident where a center will consolidate. Possibly after the recon flight today, if recon doesn't find a TC already.

I am also concerned that they have not, the proximity to the islands shouldve prompted at least TS watches at this time. The sys looks to be consolidated in the west more than the east this am and maybe i am wrong but there appeared to be a slight sw movement earlier.

They’re waiting on recon most likely.
0 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the NHC and NWS.


Model Runs Cheat Sheet:
GFS (5:30 AM/PM, 11:30 AM/PM)
HWRF, GFDL, UKMET, NAVGEM (6:30-8:00 AM/PM, 12:30-2:00 AM/PM)
ECMWF (1:45 AM/PM)

TCVN
is a weighted averaged

User avatar
GCANE
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 11497
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 8:03 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#610 Postby GCANE » Tue Jul 28, 2020 7:26 am

GFS is trending more and more for this to get whacked in the Bahamas from an UL Jet.
The remnant wave below it, in the Carib, will track into an area of high UL Divergence, possibly a developing anticyclone.
I am a little surprised no one brought up the idea of a decouple yet.

Image

Image
2 likes   

Weatherwatcher2018
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 80
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2018 4:30 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#611 Postby Weatherwatcher2018 » Tue Jul 28, 2020 7:27 am

Currently getting showers in Barbados all morning so far
1 likes   

supercane4867
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4966
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2012 10:43 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#612 Postby supercane4867 » Tue Jul 28, 2020 7:28 am

Image
7 likes   

User avatar
northjaxpro
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 8900
Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2010 11:21 am
Location: Jacksonville, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#613 Postby northjaxpro » Tue Jul 28, 2020 7:29 am

RT23 wrote:
SouthDadeFish wrote:I don't understand why NHC isn't issuing advisories for a Potential Tropical Cyclone. The Antilles are within range of watches/warnings. My guess is the NHC is waiting until they feel more confident where a center will consolidate. Possibly after the recon flight today, if recon doesn't find a TC already.

I am also concerned that they have not, the proximity to the islands shouldve prompted at least TS watches at this time. The sys looks to be consolidated in the west more than the east this am and maybe i am wrong but there appeared to be a slight sw movement earlier.


Reading the very latest TWO, they are on the cusp of classifying this as TS Isaisas this morning. They are awaiting Recon. We definitely will see some designation action today one way or another from NHC
3 likes   
NEVER, EVER SAY NEVER in the tropics and weather in general, and most importantly, with life itself!!

________________________________________________________________________________________

Fay 2008 Beryl 2012 Debby 2012 Colin 2016 Hermine 2016 Julia 2016 Matthew 2016 Irma 2017 Dorian 2019

Shell Mound
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2434
Age: 32
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2017 3:39 pm
Location: St. Petersburg, FL → Scandinavia

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#614 Postby Shell Mound » Tue Jul 28, 2020 7:34 am


Didn’t the precursors to Wilma ‘05, Matthew ‘16, and/or Dorian ‘18 also feature sprawling, monsoonal circulations interacting with an AEW?

Also, I’m starting to see signs of a convergent band on the northern side that is “linking up” with the deeper convection nearer the SW lobe.
Last edited by Shell Mound on Tue Jul 28, 2020 7:37 am, edited 1 time in total.
1 likes   
CVW / MiamiensisWx / Shell Mound
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the NHC and NWS.

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145336
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#615 Postby cycloneye » Tue Jul 28, 2020 7:36 am

A. TROPICAL DISTURBANCE (92L)

B. 28/1130Z

C. 14.6N

D. 49.9W

E. THREE/GOES-E

F. T1.0/1.0

G. IR/EIR/VIS

H. REMARKS...DUE TO RECENT RE-DEVELOPMENT, >2/10 BANDING WAS MEASURED
AROUND THE LLCC, RESULTING IN A DT OF 1.0. THE MET AND PT AGREE AND THE
FT IS BASED ON THE DT.

I. ADDL POSITIONS

NIL


...MLEVINE
1 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
SouthDadeFish
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 2835
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2010 2:54 pm
Location: Miami, FL
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#616 Postby SouthDadeFish » Tue Jul 28, 2020 7:41 am

cycloneye wrote:
A. TROPICAL DISTURBANCE (92L)

B. 28/1130Z

C. 14.6N

D. 49.9W


E. THREE/GOES-E

F. T1.0/1.0

G. IR/EIR/VIS

H. REMARKS...DUE TO RECENT RE-DEVELOPMENT, >2/10 BANDING WAS MEASURED
AROUND THE LLCC, RESULTING IN A DT OF 1.0. THE MET AND PT AGREE AND THE
FT IS BASED ON THE DT.

I. ADDL POSITIONS

NIL


...MLEVINE


They went with the... eastern vort max...?

Interesting...
5 likes   

User avatar
msbee
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3027
Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2003 10:11 am
Location: St. Maarten

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#617 Postby msbee » Tue Jul 28, 2020 7:42 am

Aric Dunn wrote:Well at least we know moisture wont be a problem.. lol

And honestly, it does not matter where the LLC finally consolidates..

it wont miss the islands.


No, unfortunately it won't miss the islands. I have never however seen so much uncertainty from the models.
I am planning here on St Maarten for at least tropical storm conditions. My worry is that others here might not be following so closely. If it doesn't have a name, its often not taken seriously. I have seen how much flooding can occur from these systems though, so I am not taking anything lightly.
5 likes   
Too many hurricanes to remember

RT23
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 65
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2017 2:21 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#618 Postby RT23 » Tue Jul 28, 2020 7:51 am

SouthDadeFish wrote:
cycloneye wrote:
A. TROPICAL DISTURBANCE (92L)

B. 28/1130Z

C. 14.6N

D. 49.9W


E. THREE/GOES-E

F. T1.0/1.0

G. IR/EIR/VIS

H. REMARKS...DUE TO RECENT RE-DEVELOPMENT, >2/10 BANDING WAS MEASURED
AROUND THE LLCC, RESULTING IN A DT OF 1.0. THE MET AND PT AGREE AND THE
FT IS BASED ON THE DT.

I. ADDL POSITIONS

NIL


...MLEVINE


They went with the... eastern vort max...?

Interesting...



I am in awe as well, the western vort seems more conducive to more defined to be the LLC.
1 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#619 Postby Aric Dunn » Tue Jul 28, 2020 7:53 am

RT23 wrote:
SouthDadeFish wrote:
cycloneye wrote:
A. TROPICAL DISTURBANCE (92L)

B. 28/1130Z

C. 14.6N

D. 49.9W


E. THREE/GOES-E

F. T1.0/1.0

G. IR/EIR/VIS

H. REMARKS...DUE TO RECENT RE-DEVELOPMENT, >2/10 BANDING WAS MEASURED
AROUND THE LLCC, RESULTING IN A DT OF 1.0. THE MET AND PT AGREE AND THE
FT IS BASED ON THE DT.

I. ADDL POSITIONS

NIL


...MLEVINE


They went with the... eastern vort max...?

Interesting...



I am in awe as well, the western vort seems more conducive to more defined to be the LLC.



Looks like they cut the difference..

Between the two lobes.

Nope nevermind.. they went with the eastern one..

Weird
Last edited by Aric Dunn on Tue Jul 28, 2020 7:54 am, edited 1 time in total.
1 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

User avatar
HurricaneAndre2008
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 335
Age: 27
Joined: Wed Jul 31, 2019 9:51 pm
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#620 Postby HurricaneAndre2008 » Tue Jul 28, 2020 7:54 am

* GFS version *
* ATLANTIC 2020 SHIPS INTENSITY FORECAST *
* IR SAT DATA AVAILABLE, OHC AVAILABLE *
* INVEST AL922020 07/28/20 12 UTC *

TIME (HR) 0 6 12 18 24 36 48 60 72 84 96 108 120 132 144 156 168
V (KT) NO LAND 35 39 44 47 51 56 61 70 68 66 64 65 64 66 67 73 73
V (KT) LAND 35 39 44 47
0 likes   
Cindy(2005), Katrina(2005), Rita(2005), Erin(2007), Isaac(2012)


Return to “2020”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests