RT23 wrote:WOW 65kt winds....
error
Moderator: S2k Moderators
RT23 wrote:WOW 65kt winds....
DestinHurricane wrote:RT23 wrote:WOW 65kt winds....
error
RT23 wrote:15:59:00Z 15.733N 57.133W 689.6 mb
(~ 20.37 inHg) 3,298 meters
(~ 10,820 feet) 1010.3 mb
(~ 29.84 inHg) - From 76° at 64 knots
(From the ENE at ~ 73.6 mph) 10.6°C
(~ 51.1°F) -1.3°C
(~ 29.7°F) 65 knots
(~ 74.8 mph)
RT23 wrote:WOW 65kt winds....
Aric Dunn wrote:I see the southern circ is becoming much more defined and circular.
way more SE inflow into it.
I would not be surprised if recon found a good well defiend llc.
Currently little to no dry air will be able to penetrate the deep moisture flux.
models are almost certainly over doing the dry air.
NXStumpy_Robothing wrote:RT23 wrote:WOW 65kt winds....
It was a result of the flight changing altitude, not actual measurable winds.
gatorcane wrote:Aric Dunn wrote:I see the southern circ is becoming much more defined and circular.
way more SE inflow into it.
I would not be surprised if recon found a good well defiend llc.
Currently little to no dry air will be able to penetrate the deep moisture flux.
models are almost certainly over doing the dry air.
A system crawling in the Bahamas and across Southern Florida with an anticyclone developing on top as the GFS shows as it nears Florida is no bueno. The model is likely undergoing the intensity by a lot and overdoing the impact of dry air.
panamatropicwatch wrote:NXStumpy_Robothing wrote:RT23 wrote:WOW 65kt winds....
It was a result of the flight changing altitude, not actual measurable winds.
Actually they are reporting several times 60 or more knots at FL.
Vdogg wrote:Are....are the blobs trying to join back up?Someone tell me I'm seeing things, but it looks like they're trying to consolidate back around the initial CoC... If that happens, this storm will be massive.
ColdMiser123 wrote:panamatropicwatch wrote:NXStumpy_Robothing wrote:It was a result of the flight changing altitude, not actual measurable winds.
Actually they are reporting several times 60 or more knots at FL.
Yeah, there are several >60 KT FL observations with the FL pressure not changing significantly:
160000 1544N 05706W 6963 03207 0090 +110 +018 078063 063 /// /// 03
160030 1544N 05704W 6964 03207 0090 +111 +022 079063 064 /// /// 03
160100 1543N 05703W 6963 03207 0085 +110 +023 079063 064 /// /// 03
160130 1543N 05702W 6963 03205 0089 +109 +029 079061 063 /// /// 03
160200 1543N 05700W 6964 03205 0094 +104 +040 080060 061 /// /// 03
160230 1542N 05659W 6967 03201 0088 +109 +039 079061 063 /// /// 03
SFLcane wrote:Aric, what is recon finding?
ColdMiser123 wrote:panamatropicwatch wrote:NXStumpy_Robothing wrote:It was a result of the flight changing altitude, not actual measurable winds.
Actually they are reporting several times 60 or more knots at FL.
Yeah, there are several >60 KT FL observations with the FL pressure not changing significantly:
160000 1544N 05706W 6963 03207 0090 +110 +018 078063 063 /// /// 03
160030 1544N 05704W 6964 03207 0090 +111 +022 079063 064 /// /// 03
160100 1543N 05703W 6963 03207 0085 +110 +023 079063 064 /// /// 03
160130 1543N 05702W 6963 03205 0089 +109 +029 079061 063 /// /// 03
160200 1543N 05700W 6964 03205 0094 +104 +040 080060 061 /// /// 03
160230 1542N 05659W 6967 03201 0088 +109 +039 079061 063 /// /// 03
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests