ATL: LAURA - Post-Tropical - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
Hurricaneman
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 7350
Age: 45
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 3:24 pm
Location: central florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 98L - Discussion

#221 Postby Hurricaneman » Tue Aug 18, 2020 5:08 pm

Am I going crazy because it looks to me like the eastern low looks to be taking over
1 likes   

User avatar
Nimbus
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5300
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2004 10:54 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 98L - Discussion

#222 Postby Nimbus » Tue Aug 18, 2020 5:19 pm

Hurricaneman wrote:Am I going crazy because it looks to me like the eastern low looks to be taking over



My thinking is that the eastern vort will dry out as it moves past 40W and since its further north and closer to the African jet it may not end up being the primary system. Although it is moving faster it would be absorbed by the stronger western vort later.

edit to add:
This is probably what divides the model track differences since the western vort is further south it would track into the Caribbean if it dominates but remains a TS.
Last edited by Nimbus on Tue Aug 18, 2020 5:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
mpic
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 622
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2005 11:24 am
Location: Splendora, TX

Re: ATL: INVEST 98L - Discussion

#223 Postby mpic » Tue Aug 18, 2020 5:25 pm

Javlin wrote:
WxEp wrote:I'm really surprised they went up to 80% within 48 hours given the current level of organization and the models appearing to push back development timing a bit. I thought they would choose to leave it at 70% for now.

Actually I am glad to see it means they are using all the tools at there disposal not not just hugging model output.I could put up Katrina as an example when Derek had the forecast correct three days before before landfall within 3/10 degree.


Another instance is in 2008 when they were saying on tv that Ike would hit Mexico and Houston was in the clear. The people here were telling us to evacuate and not wait. I talked my boss into vacation time and left Sunday before landfall on Thursday. Glad I didn't have to endure Ike in my mobile home with a tree on it.
2 likes   
Alicia, Rita, Ike, Harvey and Beryl...moved to Splendora lol

stormlover2013

Re: ATL: INVEST 98L - Discussion

#224 Postby stormlover2013 » Tue Aug 18, 2020 5:28 pm

This is when the real meteorologists will flex their muscles
0 likes   

User avatar
SFLcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10163
Age: 47
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 1:44 pm
Location: Lake Worth Florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 98L - Discussion

#225 Postby SFLcane » Tue Aug 18, 2020 5:34 pm

0 likes   

User avatar
SFLcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10163
Age: 47
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 1:44 pm
Location: Lake Worth Florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 98L - Discussion

#226 Postby SFLcane » Tue Aug 18, 2020 5:39 pm

This looks like a go but we will see what i does overnight. Nice banding on the SW side

Image
5 likes   

User avatar
Hammy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5849
Age: 41
Joined: Fri May 25, 2012 5:25 pm
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 98L - Discussion

#227 Postby Hammy » Tue Aug 18, 2020 5:49 pm

Still two distinct lows there.

Image
5 likes   
The above post is not official and should not be used as such. It is the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is not endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
jasons2k
Storm2k Executive
Storm2k Executive
Posts: 8245
Age: 51
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 12:32 pm
Location: The Woodlands, TX

Re: ATL: INVEST 98L - Discussion

#228 Postby jasons2k » Tue Aug 18, 2020 5:50 pm

Until it detaches from the ITCZ, it's a guessing game.
5 likes   

User avatar
eastcoastFL
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3901
Age: 43
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2007 12:29 pm
Location: Palm City, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 98L - Discussion

#229 Postby eastcoastFL » Tue Aug 18, 2020 5:54 pm

Is that blow up to the west where the center is?
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
toad strangler
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4543
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 3:09 pm
Location: Earth
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 98L - Discussion

#230 Postby toad strangler » Tue Aug 18, 2020 6:00 pm

eastcoastFL wrote:Is that blow up to the west where the center is?


There is no center. A couple vorts trying to be though.
1 likes   

psyclone
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4761
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 9:04 pm
Location: palm harbor fl

Re: ATL: INVEST 98L - Discussion

#231 Postby psyclone » Tue Aug 18, 2020 6:01 pm

Our tropical egg has a persistent double yolk. It needs time to consolidate and work out those structural issues. It has the needed time, plenty of warm water ahead and a calendar that really presses the scale in favor of eventual development.
1 likes   

stormlover2013

Re: ATL: INVEST 98L - Discussion

#232 Postby stormlover2013 » Tue Aug 18, 2020 6:01 pm

I don’t think the trough is going to be strong enough to break down the ridge, looking at euro, JMA, Ukmet, ridge looks pretty stout
0 likes   

MarioProtVI
Category 4
Category 4
Posts: 935
Age: 24
Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2019 7:33 pm
Location: New Jersey

Re: ATL: INVEST 98L - Discussion

#233 Postby MarioProtVI » Tue Aug 18, 2020 6:01 pm

Hammy wrote:Still two distinct lows there.

https://i.imgur.com/70Hi6TZ.png

Is that an old pass? I see 10z at the bottom and if so that’s definitely changed..
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22975
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: ATL: INVEST 98L - Discussion

#234 Postby wxman57 » Tue Aug 18, 2020 6:04 pm

Hammy wrote:Still two distinct lows there.

https://i.imgur.com/70Hi6TZ.png


That pass was 14 hours ago. Purple number at the bottom is the pass time (1013Z).
4 likes   

stormlover2013

Re: ATL: INVEST 98L - Discussion

#235 Postby stormlover2013 » Tue Aug 18, 2020 6:06 pm

wxman57 wrote:
Hammy wrote:Still two distinct lows there.

https://i.imgur.com/70Hi6TZ.png


That pass was 14 hours ago. Purple number at the bottom is the pass time (1013Z).



What do you think about the 18z gfs run
0 likes   

User avatar
Kiko Snowe
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 12
Joined: Wed May 27, 2020 10:11 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 98L - Discussion

#236 Postby Kiko Snowe » Tue Aug 18, 2020 6:11 pm

The GFS seems to not develop 98L until hour 162, when its located near Florida. I personally think there's two issues with this.
- hour 168 seems a bit far out, especially for a model that hasn't done that well this year.
- this would directly contradict the NHC's predictions.
I would trust the NHC over the 18z GFS run.
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22975
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: ATL: INVEST 98L - Discussion

#237 Postby wxman57 » Tue Aug 18, 2020 6:26 pm

stormlover2013 wrote:
wxman57 wrote:
Hammy wrote:Still two distinct lows there.

https://i.imgur.com/70Hi6TZ.png


That pass was 14 hours ago. Purple number at the bottom is the pass time (1013Z).



What do you think about the 18z gfs run


Looks goofy. Probably not worth the paper it's written on.
1 likes   

stormlover2013

Re: ATL: INVEST 98L - Discussion

#238 Postby stormlover2013 » Tue Aug 18, 2020 6:29 pm

wxman57 wrote:
stormlover2013 wrote:
wxman57 wrote:
That pass was 14 hours ago. Purple number at the bottom is the pass time (1013Z).



What do you think about the 18z gfs run


Looks goofy. Probably not worth the paper it's written on.


Figured u would say something like that lol good stuff
0 likes   

User avatar
Blinhart
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2079
Age: 48
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2011 3:13 pm
Location: Crowley, La.

Re: ATL: INVEST 98L - Discussion

#239 Postby Blinhart » Tue Aug 18, 2020 6:34 pm

I think this could very much split into 2 separate systems.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
captainbarbossa19
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 1092
Age: 27
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2019 11:09 pm
Location: Beaumont, TX

Re: ATL: INVEST 98L - Discussion

#240 Postby captainbarbossa19 » Tue Aug 18, 2020 6:35 pm

mpic wrote:
Javlin wrote:
WxEp wrote:I'm really surprised they went up to 80% within 48 hours given the current level of organization and the models appearing to push back development timing a bit. I thought they would choose to leave it at 70% for now.

Actually I am glad to see it means they are using all the tools at there disposal not not just hugging model output.I could put up Katrina as an example when Derek had the forecast correct three days before before landfall within 3/10 degree.


Another instance is in 2008 when they were saying on tv that Ike would hit Mexico and Houston was in the clear. The people here were telling us to evacuate and not wait. I talked my boss into vacation time and left Sunday before landfall on Thursday. Glad I didn't have to endure Ike in my mobile home with a tree on it.


I am glad you mentioned 2008. Before Ike entered the Gulf, Hurricane Gustav was another poorly handled storm. I presume the models were confused on where it was going to make landfall once it entered the Gulf (at the time, I did not pay as much attention to the models). The problem was that the local media stated that there was no need to evacuate in my area, but the national media said that we should "run for the hills." I am not sure why there was such a difference of opinion, but trusting the models beyond three days with a storm is at best iffy.
3 likes   


Return to “2020”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest