DestinHurricane wrote:Hurricane Mike wrote:The HWRF did very well with Hurricane Hanna.
If you predict RI every time, you'll be right a few times. See: Michael, Hanna.
Does HMON and HWRF typically forecast RI?
Moderator: S2k Moderators
DestinHurricane wrote:Hurricane Mike wrote:The HWRF did very well with Hurricane Hanna.
If you predict RI every time, you'll be right a few times. See: Michael, Hanna.
eastcoastFL wrote:DestinHurricane wrote:Hurricane Mike wrote:The HWRF did very well with Hurricane Hanna.
If you predict RI every time, you'll be right a few times. See: Michael, Hanna.
Does HMON and HWRF typically forecast RI?
gatorcane wrote:I wouldn’t waste time with the HWRF. The model almost always is way too dramatic. Think about Gonzalo. Had a CAT 3. Not even close. The model does a bit better when we already have a storm but even then it is shady for lack of a better word. Hanna was a rare coupe for the model. In this case, we have a mess with two competing vorts. Oh since we are talking about some of the not so good models, the NAVGEM dropped 98l like a bag of bricks, Stick with the GFS and Euro here.
sma10 wrote:gatorcane wrote:I wouldn’t waste time with the HWRF. The model almost always is way too dramatic. Think about Gonzalo. Had a CAT 3. Not even close. The model does a bit better when we already have a storm but even then it is shady for lack of a better word. Hanna was a rare coupe for the model. In this case, we have a mess with two competing vorts. Oh since we are talking about some of the not so good models, the NAVGEM dropped 98l like a bag of bricks, Stick with the GFS and Euro here.
Regarding the GFS, which split personality shall we stick with? The one at 12z that buries 98L into the Antilles and comes ashore the FL panhandle as a wave? Or the 18z which rides up the eastern FL peninsula and becomes a hurricane in the Carolinas?
Keldeo1997 wrote:https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/716215692617187328/745457108660781096/98L_intensity_latest.png
Uhhh HWRF you ok there buddy?
Blown Away wrote:Check out 00z guidance & intensity... Wow what a change of events...
BobHarlem wrote:0z early models shifted right from earlier, no more TVCN land runner, intensity models went way up also, with I/TVCN showing a cat 3 at then end of the run.
https://i.imgur.com/csRV2Dq.gif
eastcoastFL wrote:BobHarlem wrote:0z early models shifted right from earlier, no more TVCN land runner, intensity models went way up also, with I/TVCN showing a cat 3 at then end of the run.
https://i.imgur.com/csRV2Dq.gif
Let’s hope the next run keeps going right. Waaay right. I wouldn’t mind tracking a Cat 5 headed for the arctic.
Good to see the TVCN avg is turning before FL now. Maybe they’ll miss the Bahamas in a few runs
eastcoastFL wrote:BobHarlem wrote:0z early models shifted right from earlier, no more TVCN land runner, intensity models went way up also, with I/TVCN showing a cat 3 at then end of the run.
https://i.imgur.com/csRV2Dq.gif
Let’s hope the next run keeps going right. Waaay right. I wouldn’t mind tracking a Cat 5 headed for the arctic.
Good to see the TVCN avg is turning before FL now. Maybe they’ll miss the Bahamas in a few runs
BobHarlem wrote:eastcoastFL wrote:BobHarlem wrote:0z early models shifted right from earlier, no more TVCN land runner, intensity models went way up also, with I/TVCN showing a cat 3 at then end of the run.
https://i.imgur.com/csRV2Dq.gif
Let’s hope the next run keeps going right. Waaay right. I wouldn’t mind tracking a Cat 5 headed for the arctic.
Good to see the TVCN avg is turning before FL now. Maybe they’ll miss the Bahamas in a few runs
TVCN isn't turning, last point is south of Andros island. still moving WNW as a cat 3.
Hypercane_Kyle wrote:TheStormExpert wrote:We need an actual center and storm to form before we look too much at the hurricane models. We saw this same story of over-intensifying Isaias in its early stages.
And we also saw the HWRF be correct with Hanna just a few days prior to that, despite the global models failing to show anything.
Will also point out the global models consistently played catchup with Hanna and Isaias.
TheStormExpert wrote:Hypercane_Kyle wrote:TheStormExpert wrote:We need an actual center and storm to form before we look too much at the hurricane models. We saw this same story of over-intensifying Isaias in its early stages.
And we also saw the HWRF be correct with Hanna just a few days prior to that, despite the global models failing to show anything.
Will also point out the global models consistently played catchup with Hanna and Isaias.
The HWRF tends to be over bullish. I’m not buying it until a well developed storm forms.
eastcoastFL wrote:TheStormExpert wrote:Hypercane_Kyle wrote:
And we also saw the HWRF be correct with Hanna just a few days prior to that, despite the global models failing to show anything.
Will also point out the global models consistently played catchup with Hanna and Isaias.
The HWRF tends to be over bullish. I’m not buying it until a well developed storm forms.
Which storms has it over done ? I can’t remember how models performed a year ago unless it was something major. But I don’t think it went too crazy with Isaias or Hanna. Did it blow up any early storms?
eastcoastFL wrote:TheStormExpert wrote:Hypercane_Kyle wrote:
And we also saw the HWRF be correct with Hanna just a few days prior to that, despite the global models failing to show anything.
Will also point out the global models consistently played catchup with Hanna and Isaias.
The HWRF tends to be over bullish. I’m not buying it until a well developed storm forms.
Which storms has it over done ? I can’t remember how models performed a year ago unless it was something major. But I don’t think it went too crazy with Isaias or Hanna. Did it blow up any early storms?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests