CrazyC83 wrote:With the center being poorly assessed, I'd throw out the 00Z models as they haven't resolved the current situation.
garbage in, garbage out. hard to believe hour 60 when hour 3 is inaccurate.
Moderator: S2k Moderators
CrazyC83 wrote:With the center being poorly assessed, I'd throw out the 00Z models as they haven't resolved the current situation.
AxaltaRacing24 wrote:CrazyC83 wrote:With the center being poorly assessed, I'd throw out the 00Z models as they haven't resolved the current situation.
garbage in, garbage out. hard to believe hour 60 when hour 3 is inaccurate.
catskillfire51 wrote:CrazyC83 wrote:With the center being poorly assessed, I'd throw out the 00Z models as they haven't resolved the current situation.
I was thinking that too, you think by tomorrow we should get something more concrete? I'm planning for the worst anyway but just frustrating. Surprisingly 3 years ago today we were doing the same thing with Harvey in my area, at least then we had a clue
Highteeld wrote:AxaltaRacing24 wrote:CrazyC83 wrote:With the center being poorly assessed, I'd throw out the 00Z models as they haven't resolved the current situation.
garbage in, garbage out. hard to believe hour 60 when hour 3 is inaccurate.
this. it's a poorly calculated initial value differential equation
Craters wrote:I think it might be a good idea to remind everybody of what the NHC has access to that we mere mortals never get to see. Take a look at this list
https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/modelsummary.shtml
Each listing with an * in front of it is unavailable to us; Table 2 is particularly noteworthy. They have a lot more, model-wise, to cogitate than we do (obviously).
That having been said, I'd consider drinking a toast of kerosene to the NHC if it would let me get a peek at the shadow ensembles for Laura right now...
CrazyC83 wrote:Craters wrote:I think it might be a good idea to remind everybody of what the NHC has access to that we mere mortals never get to see. Take a look at this list
https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/modelsummary.shtml
Each listing with an * in front of it is unavailable to us; Table 2 is particularly noteworthy. They have a lot more, model-wise, to cogitate than we do (obviously).
That having been said, I'd consider drinking a toast of kerosene to the NHC if it would let me get a peek at the shadow ensembles for Laura right now...
If any ensembles adjusted for initial position southward, those could be valuable.
Kingarabian wrote:Think about it. Even though the models are coming in with an initially weaker Laura after Cuba, they still make it a major hurricane upon landfall.
Highteeld wrote:Kingarabian wrote:Think about it. Even though the models are coming in with an initially weaker Laura after Cuba, they still make it a major hurricane upon landfall.
Puts 900 mb on the table
Highteeld wrote:Kingarabian wrote:Think about it. Even though the models are coming in with an initially weaker Laura after Cuba, they still make it a major hurricane upon landfall.
Puts 900 mb on the table
CrazyC83 wrote:Highteeld wrote:Kingarabian wrote:Think about it. Even though the models are coming in with an initially weaker Laura after Cuba, they still make it a major hurricane upon landfall.
Puts 900 mb on the table
Not necessarily. If Laura is stronger sooner, then an ERC could come into play before landfall and it may only grow spatially. Laura still needs to develop an inner core, but over water that is feasible.
Kingarabian wrote:CrazyC83 wrote:Highteeld wrote:Puts 900 mb on the table
Not necessarily. If Laura is stronger sooner, then an ERC could come into play before landfall and it may only grow spatially. Laura still needs to develop an inner core, but over water that is feasible.
But then an ERC brings back Ike/Katrina vibes which arguably felt much stronger than a Cat.2/Cat.3 respectively.
bella_may wrote:According to ASCAT and new center has formed back East between Cuba and Jamaica. Might have to throw out the models until morning
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests