ATL: TEDDY - Post-Tropical - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
cheezyWXguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6108
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 12:29 am
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: ATL: TEDDY - Hurricane - Discussion

#621 Postby cheezyWXguy » Thu Sep 17, 2020 6:00 pm

Eye looks a little off and cloud tops have warmed on the east side. Probably just a temporary hiccup, and recon will still likely find a stronger storm than when it left
0 likes   

User avatar
aspen
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8818
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 7:10 pm
Location: Connecticut, USA

Re: ATL: TEDDY - Hurricane - Discussion

#622 Postby aspen » Thu Sep 17, 2020 6:02 pm

I think the eyewall gap is why Teddy is having this intensification hiccup (although the pressure is still falling). If it can close off that hole, a Cat 5 is likely, since there’s still no sign of an EWRC.
0 likes   
Irene '11 Sandy '12 Hermine '16 5/15/2018 Derecho Fay '20 Isaias '20 Elsa '21 Henri '21 Ida '21

I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.

us89
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 399
Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2019 11:12 pm
Location: Tallahassee, FL

Re: ATL: TEDDY - Hurricane - Discussion

#623 Postby us89 » Thu Sep 17, 2020 6:03 pm

Weather Dude wrote:
Blinhart wrote:
Hybridstorm_November2001 wrote:
Hey, blame the NHC not me for that. :lol:


I actually agree, I think they need to have a Cat 6 for storms with winds from 180-205 MPH and Cat 7 for storms 205+MPH.

Nah. The damage of a cat 5 is already complete destruction. No need to add any categories. Same with tornadoes


I disagree with this. The EF-scale for tornadoes is explicitly a damage scale - any wind speeds associated with EF-scale ratings are simply estimates based on damage.

The SSHWS is explicitly a wind scale - and while surface damage may be used in post-analysis to assess the intensity of landfalling tropical cyclones, the winds of tropical cyclones are usually directly measured or estimated from direct measurements (surface observations, buoys, ship reports, recon FL wind, SFMR, dropsondes, etc).

With that in mind, in my opinion it wouldn't be a terrible idea to separate category 5 storms into three categories: "average" (like Michael, Matthew), "extreme" (Irma, Dorian, Rita), and "exceptional" (Patricia). If I had my way I'd start "category 6" at 155 kt/180 mph, and "category 7" would start at 175 kt/200 mph.
1 likes   

Shell Mound
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2434
Age: 32
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2017 3:39 pm
Location: St. Petersburg, FL → Scandinavia

Re: ATL: TEDDY - Hurricane - Discussion

#624 Postby Shell Mound » Thu Sep 17, 2020 6:03 pm

cheezyWXguy wrote:Eye looks a little off and cloud tops have warmed on the east side. Probably just a temporary hiccup, and recon will still likely find a stronger storm than when it left

Data from the northeastern quadrant confirm that the MSW at 10 m are still ~120 knots, based on an averaged reduction of FL and SFMR-derived winds.
0 likes   
CVW / MiamiensisWx / Shell Mound
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the NHC and NWS.

ClarCari
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 579
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2020 11:02 am

Re: ATL: TEDDY - Hurricane - Discussion

#625 Postby ClarCari » Thu Sep 17, 2020 6:06 pm

us89 wrote:
Weather Dude wrote:
Blinhart wrote:
I actually agree, I think they need to have a Cat 6 for storms with winds from 180-205 MPH and Cat 7 for storms 205+MPH.

Nah. The damage of a cat 5 is already complete destruction. No need to add any categories. Same with tornadoes


I disagree with this. The EF-scale for tornadoes is explicitly a damage scale - any wind speeds associated with EF-scale ratings are simply estimates based on damage.

The SSHWS is explicitly a wind scale - and while surface damage may be used in post-analysis to assess the intensity of landfalling tropical cyclones, the winds of tropical cyclones are usually directly measured or estimated from direct measurements (surface observations, buoys, ship reports, recon FL wind, SFMR, dropsondes, etc).

With that in mind, in my opinion it wouldn't be a terrible idea to separate category 5 storms into three categories: "average" (like Michael, Matthew), "extreme" (Irma, Dorian, Rita), and "exceptional" (Patricia). If I had my way I'd start "category 6" at 155 kt/180 mph, and "category 7" would start at 175 kt/200 mph.

EF5 tornadoes and Category 5 hurricanes are just too rare too split then up into subcategories. Maybeee with climate change that may one day be the case :lol:
4 likes   

PavelGaborik10
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 455
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2018 3:23 pm

Re: ATL: TEDDY - Hurricane - Discussion

#626 Postby PavelGaborik10 » Thu Sep 17, 2020 6:16 pm

abajan wrote:
PavelGaborik10 wrote:
plasticup wrote:
Oh, who cares about the 7 day range. GIGO at that range. I am talking about the 4 days Bermuda impacts, which are looking less and less every run as the models trend east.


Teddy is only 5 days away from a potential US/Canada impact, sir.

True, but consider plasticup's location. Maybe under normal circumstances they wouldn't have said that. Their focus is, understandably, on Bermuda.


I'm from Nova Scotia which currently has a bullseye on it in the five day range.

So to answer his question, I certainly care where this ends up 108-120 hours from now. I think everyone from Bermuda, to Maine all the way to Newfoundland should be closely monitoring this system.

With all due respect the general geographical location of the vast majority of posters active in this very thread isn't too hard to gauge.

There are very, very few posters who care to follow a system that isn't an immediate threat to the US.
Last edited by PavelGaborik10 on Thu Sep 17, 2020 6:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.
3 likes   

tolakram
Admin
Admin
Posts: 20009
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)

Re: ATL: TEDDY - Hurricane - Discussion

#627 Postby tolakram » Thu Sep 17, 2020 6:19 pm

PavelGaborik10 wrote:
abajan wrote:
PavelGaborik10 wrote:
Teddy is only 5 days away from a potential US/Canada impact, sir.

True, but consider plasticup's location. Maybe under normal circumstances they wouldn't have said that. Their focus is, understandably, on Bermuda.


I'm from Nova Scotia which currently has a bullseye on it in the five day range.

So to answer his question, I certainly care where this ends up 108-120 hours from now. I think everyone from Bermuda, to Maine all the way to Newfoundland should be closely monitoring this system.


You might want to consider putting your general location as part of your profile so we don't have to guess.

To everyone:

As usual with these types of situations, please stop finding things to get upset about, if you have a problem with a post report it.
4 likes   
M a r k
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.

SconnieCane
Category 4
Category 4
Posts: 998
Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2018 5:29 pm
Location: Madison, WI

Re: ATL: TEDDY - Hurricane - Discussion

#628 Postby SconnieCane » Thu Sep 17, 2020 6:23 pm

Everyone became bearish on the bear, so it growled and bombed out.
14 likes   

MaineWeatherNut
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 225
Joined: Sun Sep 01, 2013 5:06 pm

Re: ATL: TEDDY - Hurricane - Discussion

#629 Postby MaineWeatherNut » Thu Sep 17, 2020 6:25 pm

Another little update on Hurricane Teddy from my blog.

http://theweatherwatch.org/category-4-h ... r-bermuda/
1 likes   
The content of this post does NOT constitute official forecast and should not be used as such. They are the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or Storm2K. For official information, please refer to the local meteorological centers of respective areas.

User avatar
cheezyWXguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6108
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 12:29 am
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: ATL: TEDDY - Hurricane - Discussion

#630 Postby cheezyWXguy » Thu Sep 17, 2020 6:46 pm

Think the reason for the recent slight degradation of it appearance is due to a minor gulp of dry air. Vis/shortwave shows the eye has remained a consistent width but has become a little cloud-filled, and there is a dry slot just to the north of the cdo. I think this will mix out pretty quickly and Teddy will have his best shot at cat5 overnight
0 likes   

User avatar
aspen
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8818
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 7:10 pm
Location: Connecticut, USA

Re: ATL: TEDDY - Hurricane - Discussion

#631 Postby aspen » Thu Sep 17, 2020 6:47 pm

cheezyWXguy wrote:Think the reason for the recent slight degradation of it appearance is due to a minor gulp of dry air. Vis/shortwave shows the eye has remained a consistent width but has become a little cloud-filled, and there is a dry slot just to the north of the cdo. I think this will mix out pretty quickly and Teddy will have his best shot at cat5 overnight

It probably will, because recon confirmed the eyewall has closed again. The dry air might’ve degraded the southern eyewall over the past few hours and Teddy has only just been able to mix out enough dry air to close it.
0 likes   
Irene '11 Sandy '12 Hermine '16 5/15/2018 Derecho Fay '20 Isaias '20 Elsa '21 Henri '21 Ida '21

I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.

User avatar
aspen
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8818
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 7:10 pm
Location: Connecticut, USA

Re: ATL: TEDDY - Hurricane - Discussion

#632 Postby aspen » Thu Sep 17, 2020 6:50 pm

Recon is leaving already after just one pass. We’re going to have to rely solely on satellite estimates from now on, and with this hiccup in organization, those could get brought down briefly.
0 likes   
Irene '11 Sandy '12 Hermine '16 5/15/2018 Derecho Fay '20 Isaias '20 Elsa '21 Henri '21 Ida '21

I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.

Do_For_Love
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 271
Age: 35
Joined: Sat May 09, 2015 7:47 am
Location: Delaware

Re: ATL: TEDDY - Hurricane - Discussion

#633 Postby Do_For_Love » Thu Sep 17, 2020 6:57 pm

aspen wrote:Recon is leaving already after just one pass. We’re going to have to rely solely on satellite estimates from now on, and with this hiccup in organization, those could get brought down briefly.


Does Dmax have any effect on storms of this magnitude?
3 likes   
Irene '11, Sandy '12, Fay '20, Isaias '20, Ida '21

User avatar
Beef Stew
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 498
Joined: Sat May 30, 2020 11:31 am
Location: South Florida

Re: ATL: TEDDY - Hurricane - Discussion

#634 Postby Beef Stew » Thu Sep 17, 2020 7:02 pm

aspen wrote:Recon is leaving already after just one pass. We’re going to have to rely solely on satellite estimates from now on, and with this hiccup in organization, those could get brought down briefly.


Well, that was quick. If we get another bout of intensification later tonight (as I suspect we might), it's a shame recon won't be there for it. At least the NHC has been nailing the intensity based off of satellite imagery so far with Teddy.
2 likes   

User avatar
aspen
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8818
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 7:10 pm
Location: Connecticut, USA

Re: ATL: TEDDY - Hurricane - Discussion

#635 Postby aspen » Thu Sep 17, 2020 7:15 pm

I believe there are two possibilities for Teddy in the next 24-48 hours:

1.) Teddy overcomes this hiccup in RI and continues to bomb out, becoming a Category 5 hurricane sometime tomorrow.

2.) Teddy continues to have its eyewall broken and reformed, putting a lid on intensification and having it remain around 115-125 kt for a while.

The first scenario could lead to an ERWC coming on quicker. However, the second would rack up a lot more ACE, assuming the first would lead to quicker weakening after an EWRC.
0 likes   
Irene '11 Sandy '12 Hermine '16 5/15/2018 Derecho Fay '20 Isaias '20 Elsa '21 Henri '21 Ida '21

I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.

User avatar
northjaxpro
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 8900
Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2010 11:21 am
Location: Jacksonville, FL

Re: ATL: TEDDY - Hurricane - Discussion

#636 Postby northjaxpro » Thu Sep 17, 2020 7:16 pm

What a darn shame that we will not have Recon out there just as Teddy could be ramping to Cat 5 intensity. :x

Satellite estimates will have to suffice.
0 likes   
NEVER, EVER SAY NEVER in the tropics and weather in general, and most importantly, with life itself!!

________________________________________________________________________________________

Fay 2008 Beryl 2012 Debby 2012 Colin 2016 Hermine 2016 Julia 2016 Matthew 2016 Irma 2017 Dorian 2019

dukeblue219
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 535
Joined: Fri Sep 30, 2016 3:52 pm

Re: ATL: TEDDY - Hurricane - Discussion

#637 Postby dukeblue219 » Thu Sep 17, 2020 7:30 pm

northjaxpro wrote:What a darn shame that we will not have Recon out there just as Teddy could be ramping to Cat 5 intensity. :x

Satellite estimates will have to suffice.


Looks like NOAA3 recon is making a pass right now, NW to SE. Should be in the center in 10 minutes or so. Not sure why everyone is saying they left the scene.
0 likes   

User avatar
ElectricStorm
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5044
Age: 24
Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2019 11:23 pm
Location: Skiatook, OK / Norman, OK

Re: ATL: TEDDY - Hurricane - Discussion

#638 Postby ElectricStorm » Thu Sep 17, 2020 7:35 pm

northjaxpro wrote:What a darn shame that we will not have Recon out there just as Teddy could be ramping to Cat 5 intensity. :x

Satellite estimates will have to suffice.

At least we know they aren't afraid to pull the trigger on cat 5 if needed. They did it with Lorenzo
0 likes   
B.S Meteorology, University of Oklahoma '25

Please refer to the NHC, NWS, or SPC for official information.

dukeblue219
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 535
Joined: Fri Sep 30, 2016 3:52 pm

Re: ATL: TEDDY - Hurricane - Discussion

#639 Postby dukeblue219 » Thu Sep 17, 2020 7:38 pm

Through NW eyewall now, 946.8 extrap, 114kt SFMR
0 likes   

User avatar
aspen
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8818
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 7:10 pm
Location: Connecticut, USA

Re: ATL: TEDDY - Hurricane - Discussion

#640 Postby aspen » Thu Sep 17, 2020 7:45 pm

Eye has become more ragged but it still looks good.
Image
0 likes   
Irene '11 Sandy '12 Hermine '16 5/15/2018 Derecho Fay '20 Isaias '20 Elsa '21 Henri '21 Ida '21

I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.


Return to “2020”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest