http://216.127.93.220/phpbb2/viewtopic. ... 2dd3d08fef
Got a laugh out of this...
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
-
ncweatherwizard
- Professional-Met

- Posts: 1243
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 9:45 am
- Location: Ft. Collins, CO
Got a laugh out of this...
LOL...who would we would have this low off the US coast in November? I tend to contribute it to the remnant low remaining south of 30 North, and troughs moving northeast, missing the system well east in the ocean altogether. And now that it is near the coast, we have a ridge in control? A bit of a different situation I might say.
http://216.127.93.220/phpbb2/viewtopic. ... 2dd3d08fef
http://216.127.93.220/phpbb2/viewtopic. ... 2dd3d08fef
0 likes
Misleading thread: this isn't Nicholas per se
I believe that this thread is very misleading. The TROPICAL ENTITY "Nicholas" technically did NOT make it across the Atlantic. This is only a nontropical (or at worst subtropical) system partially associated with the remnant low of Nicholas. So, it appears to have attained some energy from Nicholas, but that's all. Also, if it were to be named, it would not get the name Nicholas.
The bottom line imo is that there is absolutely no evidence that Nicholas would have made it all the way had it not weakened to a remnant low. Keep in mind that the fact of it having weakened so much could have easily been the main reason the lower level winds took the remnant low more westerly toward the U.S. since a weaker system has a lower mean steering level. So, had Nicholas not weakened to a remnant low, it could still easily have recurved like those folks in that thread had expected.
The bottom line imo is that there is absolutely no evidence that Nicholas would have made it all the way had it not weakened to a remnant low. Keep in mind that the fact of it having weakened so much could have easily been the main reason the lower level winds took the remnant low more westerly toward the U.S. since a weaker system has a lower mean steering level. So, had Nicholas not weakened to a remnant low, it could still easily have recurved like those folks in that thread had expected.
0 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
-
ncweatherwizard
- Professional-Met

- Posts: 1243
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 9:45 am
- Location: Ft. Collins, CO
Re: Misleading thread: this isn't Nicholas per se
LarryWx wrote:I believe that this thread is very misleading. The TROPICAL ENTITY "Nicholas" technically did NOT make it across the Atlantic. This is only a nontropical (or at worst subtropical) system partially associated with the remnant low of Nicholas. So, it appears to have attained some energy from Nicholas, but that's all. Also, if it were to be named, it would not get the name Nicholas.
The bottom line imo is that there is absolutely no evidence that Nicholas would have made it all the way had it not weakened to a remnant low. Keep in mind that the fact of it having weakened so much could have easily been the main reason the lower level winds took the remnant low more westerly toward the U.S. since a weaker system has a lower mean steering level. So, had Nicholas not weakened to a remnant low, it could still easily have recurved like those folks in that thread had expected.
In that you are correct; had Nicholas remained stronger than a remnant low, it would have definitely been pulled to the north, which is why I mentioned the system being below 30N... And now we have this unseasonable ridge in control. Not saying that this is actually Nicholas moving across the Atlantic Ocean, and that those who said that it would not traverse the ocean were completely wrong, but rather I stress the peculiarity of the entire situation from Point A to Point B.
0 likes
-
Josephine96
I remember now..
Yes I remember now when I thought Nicholas would make it across the Atlantic..
who's laughing now lol just kidding
0 likes
Re: Misleading thread: this isn't Nicholas per se
ncweatherwizard wrote:In that you are correct; had Nicholas remained stronger than a remnant low, it would have definitely been pulled to the north, which is why I mentioned the system being below 30N... And now we have this unseasonable ridge in control. Not saying that this is actually Nicholas moving across the Atlantic Ocean, and that those who said that it would not traverse the ocean were completely wrong, but rather I stress the peculiarity of the entire situation from Point A to Point B.
I agree with this 100%. It is, indeed, pretty cool how the remnant low associated with Nicholas is making it to the U.S. These kind of things are very interesting in retrospect.
Nevertheless, the climatology still ruled. From 1851-2002, there were 36 T.S.+'s that were first declared a T.D.+ east of 55W and south of 20N ON OR AFTER 9/26. NONE of these later hit the U.S. Once 2003 is added to the stats, it will make 0 for 37.
0 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
-
ColdFront77
- Stormsfury
- Category 5

- Posts: 10549
- Age: 53
- Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 6:27 pm
- Location: Summerville, SC
ColdFront77 wrote:This system approaching Florida today has been considered "the remnants of Nicholas" according to the National Hurricane Center, so that is what we have referring to it, pretty much understanding that the "true Nicholas" moved out to sea.
Tom, I have to differ ... I believe the true Nicholas low center was sheared apart some time ago as the chaotic situation unfolded (and was reflected with the NRL's change to 96L)
SF
0 likes
-
ColdFront77
- stormchazer
- Category 5

- Posts: 2462
- Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 12:00 pm
- Location: Lakeland, Florida
- Contact:
Face it...there should be some symbolic crow served. 
0 likes
The posts or stuff said are NOT an official forecast and my opinion alone. Please look to the NHC and NWS for official forecasts and products.
Model Runs Cheat Sheet:
GFS (5:30 AM/PM, 11:30 AM/PM)
HWRF, GFDL, UKMET, NAVGEM (6:30-8:00 AM/PM, 12:30-2:00 AM/PM)
ECMWF (1:45 AM/PM)
TCVN is a weighted averaged
Opinions my own.
Model Runs Cheat Sheet:
GFS (5:30 AM/PM, 11:30 AM/PM)
HWRF, GFDL, UKMET, NAVGEM (6:30-8:00 AM/PM, 12:30-2:00 AM/PM)
ECMWF (1:45 AM/PM)
TCVN is a weighted averaged
Opinions my own.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 86 guests


