Trough of low pressure in Western Caribbean (Is Invest 95L)

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
underthwx
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2360
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2011 2:14 pm
Location: Brazoria County Texas

Re: Possible SW Caribbean Development

#741 Postby underthwx » Sat Oct 17, 2020 7:29 pm

Weather Dude wrote:
SFLcane wrote:


Look at the mean..This my friends right here is VERY interesting!

That doesn't look very strong, or is that map supposed to mean something else?


Yeah....what exactly does that map show?.....would you please describe it?....thanks man....
0 likes   

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23691
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

Re: Possible SW Caribbean Development

#742 Postby gatorcane » Sat Oct 17, 2020 7:34 pm

NAVGEM completely drops it, the earlier runs at least had a low and the the 06Z had a hurricane in the Bahamas.

Image
0 likes   

psyclone
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4762
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 9:04 pm
Location: palm harbor fl

Re: Possible SW Caribbean Development

#743 Postby psyclone » Sat Oct 17, 2020 7:40 pm

We keep staring long enough and I'll tell you what the GFS is going to show....Christmas. Just keep pushing it back until we're out of time por favor...
0 likes   

User avatar
Spacecoast
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 758
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2017 2:03 pm

Re: Possible SW Caribbean Development

#744 Postby Spacecoast » Sat Oct 17, 2020 7:42 pm

aspen wrote:
LarryWx wrote:
eastcoastFL wrote:

Uhh...where did it go?


:eek: :eek: :eek:
https://i.imgur.com/gyaKxJw.png

Yikes, the operational GFS and the mean ensemble GFS are WAY off.


Since the GEFS ugraded to the FVS core, wouldn't the 'operational' shown be the GFS-Para, rather than the GFSv15?
0 likes   

TheStormExpert

Re: Possible SW Caribbean Development

#745 Postby TheStormExpert » Sat Oct 17, 2020 7:57 pm

:uarrow: God, if this thing doesn’t develop into something at least we just wasted around 50 pages talking about a lotta nothing between this thread and the Global Models Discussion thread. :lol:
4 likes   

User avatar
toad strangler
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4543
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 3:09 pm
Location: Earth
Contact:

Re: Possible SW Caribbean Development

#746 Postby toad strangler » Sat Oct 17, 2020 8:01 pm

Gotta have patience with a complex set up like this.
3 likes   

User avatar
aspen
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8818
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 7:10 pm
Location: Connecticut, USA

Re: Possible SW Caribbean Development

#747 Postby aspen » Sat Oct 17, 2020 8:04 pm

GFS-Para is much faster than the GFS because the low over the Yucatán is stronger and throws Zeta into Cuba.
0 likes   
Irene '11 Sandy '12 Hermine '16 5/15/2018 Derecho Fay '20 Isaias '20 Elsa '21 Henri '21 Ida '21

I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.

TheStormExpert

Re: Possible SW Caribbean Development

#748 Postby TheStormExpert » Sat Oct 17, 2020 8:23 pm

GFS might have been trolling us this whole time! :roll:

 https://twitter.com/derekortt/status/1317588711568265219


1 likes   

User avatar
toad strangler
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4543
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 3:09 pm
Location: Earth
Contact:

Re: Possible SW Caribbean Development

#749 Postby toad strangler » Sat Oct 17, 2020 8:26 pm

TheStormExpert wrote:GFS might have been trolling us this whole time! :roll:

https://twitter.com/derekortt/status/1317588711568265219


Ortt hasn't had a great year. We'll see.
0 likes   

TheStormExpert

Re: Possible SW Caribbean Development

#750 Postby TheStormExpert » Sat Oct 17, 2020 8:31 pm

toad strangler wrote:
TheStormExpert wrote:GFS might have been trolling us this whole time! :roll:

https://twitter.com/derekortt/status/1317588711568265219


Ortt hasn't had a great year. We'll see.

Neither have the models, so time will tell who’s right!
0 likes   

User avatar
ElectricStorm
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5044
Age: 24
Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2019 11:23 pm
Location: Skiatook, OK / Norman, OK

Re: Possible SW Caribbean Development

#751 Postby ElectricStorm » Sat Oct 17, 2020 8:32 pm

TheStormExpert wrote:GFS might have been trolling us this whole time! :roll:

https://twitter.com/derekortt/status/1317588711568265219

Disturbance 57? Where does he get that number? Anyway, he's been off a bunch this year... We'll see
2 likes   
B.S Meteorology, University of Oklahoma '25

Please refer to the NHC, NWS, or SPC for official information.

User avatar
aspen
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8818
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 7:10 pm
Location: Connecticut, USA

Re: Possible SW Caribbean Development

#752 Postby aspen » Sat Oct 17, 2020 8:34 pm

Here are the three moving parts in this scenario right now:

1.) Zeta’s gyre — the models have been struggling with the overall size of the area of spin, and many have tried to concentrate vorticity on the NE side. If the center of spin is smaller and becomes more concentrated, we would see earlier development more to the SW.

2.) Epsilon/94L — it’ll break down the ridge but only temporarily. Depending on how strong and fast or slow it is, either it’ll allow the ridge to rebuild and block Zeta, or it’ll drag Zeta to the NE.

3.) The Yucatán Low — a second lobe to the gyre/another area of low pressure moving from the GAs to the Yucatán is responsible for throwing Zeta into Cuba quicker on the GFS-Para. If it is rather strong, it will try to prevent Zeta from developing and push it towards the islands quicker. If it’s weaker, Zeta will have better luck developing.
4 likes   
Irene '11 Sandy '12 Hermine '16 5/15/2018 Derecho Fay '20 Isaias '20 Elsa '21 Henri '21 Ida '21

I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.

TheStormExpert

Re: Possible SW Caribbean Development

#753 Postby TheStormExpert » Sat Oct 17, 2020 8:34 pm

Weather Dude wrote:
TheStormExpert wrote:GFS might have been trolling us this whole time! :roll:

https://twitter.com/derekortt/status/1317588711568265219

Disturbance 57? Where does he get that number? Anyway, he's been off a bunch this year... We'll see

It’s his numbering system where he works.
0 likes   

User avatar
ElectricStorm
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5044
Age: 24
Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2019 11:23 pm
Location: Skiatook, OK / Norman, OK

Re: Possible SW Caribbean Development

#754 Postby ElectricStorm » Sat Oct 17, 2020 8:41 pm

aspen wrote:Here are the three moving parts in this scenario right now:

1.) Zeta’s gyre — the models have been struggling with the overall size of the area of spin, and many have tried to concentrate vorticity on the NE side. If the center of spin is smaller and becomes more concentrated, we would see earlier development more to the SW.

2.) Epsilon/94L — it’ll break down the ridge but only temporarily. Depending on how strong and fast or slow it is, either it’ll allow the ridge to rebuild and block Zeta, or it’ll drag Zeta to the NE.

3.) The Yucatán Low — a second lobe to the gyre/another area of low pressure moving from the GAs to the Yucatán is responsible for throwing Zeta into Cuba quicker on the GFS-Para. If it is rather strong, it will try to prevent Zeta from developing and push it towards the islands quicker. If it’s weaker, Zeta will have better luck developing.

I have noticed that the GFS has been pretty consistent over the last few runs of not showing a major plowing into Cuba like it did a few days ago, so the para may be on to something there as the other models don't really show a whole lot happening before Cuba either. It has been showing it peaking in the Bahamas for a few runs now, but that would impact the same areas affected by Dorian. Regardless of what the models show, I still don't trust anything that forms down there, assuming the upper level environment is good
0 likes   
B.S Meteorology, University of Oklahoma '25

Please refer to the NHC, NWS, or SPC for official information.

User avatar
ElectricStorm
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5044
Age: 24
Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2019 11:23 pm
Location: Skiatook, OK / Norman, OK

Re: Possible SW Caribbean Development

#755 Postby ElectricStorm » Sat Oct 17, 2020 8:42 pm

TheStormExpert wrote:
Weather Dude wrote:
TheStormExpert wrote:GFS might have been trolling us this whole time! :roll:

https://twitter.com/derekortt/status/1317588711568265219

Disturbance 57? Where does he get that number? Anyway, he's been off a bunch this year... We'll see

It’s his numbering system where he works.

I figured it was something like that but it makes sense because he's the only one I've ever seen use them
0 likes   
B.S Meteorology, University of Oklahoma '25

Please refer to the NHC, NWS, or SPC for official information.

AutoPenalti
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4030
Age: 29
Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2015 4:16 pm
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, Florida

Re: Possible SW Caribbean Development

#756 Postby AutoPenalti » Sat Oct 17, 2020 8:46 pm

I’d personally give it 3 more days before I start to lose confidence in ensembles.
1 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the NHC and NWS.


Model Runs Cheat Sheet:
GFS (5:30 AM/PM, 11:30 AM/PM)
HWRF, GFDL, UKMET, NAVGEM (6:30-8:00 AM/PM, 12:30-2:00 AM/PM)
ECMWF (1:45 AM/PM)

TCVN
is a weighted averaged

User avatar
aspen
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8818
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 7:10 pm
Location: Connecticut, USA

Re: Possible SW Caribbean Development

#757 Postby aspen » Sat Oct 17, 2020 8:54 pm

AutoPenalti wrote:I’d personally give it 3 more days before I start to lose confidence in ensembles.

That’s fair. By 3 days, we should have Zeta’s precursor, and if it’s struggling while the ensembles are still bullish, then the bearish globals would probably be right.
0 likes   
Irene '11 Sandy '12 Hermine '16 5/15/2018 Derecho Fay '20 Isaias '20 Elsa '21 Henri '21 Ida '21

I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.

LarryWx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6306
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2003 2:04 pm
Location: GA

Re: Possible SW Caribbean Development

#758 Postby LarryWx » Sat Oct 17, 2020 8:56 pm

aspen wrote:Here are the three moving parts in this scenario right now:

1.) Zeta’s gyre — the models have been struggling with the overall size of the area of spin, and many have tried to concentrate vorticity on the NE side. If the center of spin is smaller and becomes more concentrated, we would see earlier development more to the SW.

2.) Epsilon/94L — it’ll break down the ridge but only temporarily. Depending on how strong and fast or slow it is, either it’ll allow the ridge to rebuild and block Zeta, or it’ll drag Zeta to the NE.

3.) The Yucatán Low — a second lobe to the gyre/another area of low pressure moving from the GAs to the Yucatán is responsible for throwing Zeta into Cuba quicker on the GFS-Para. If it is rather strong, it will try to prevent Zeta from developing and push it towards the islands quicker. If it’s weaker, Zeta will have better luck developing.


I think the main controlling factor is how strong the SE US ridge will be. In recent years, it has been strong/persistent due to the very warm western Pacific making the last few winters mild in the SE US.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

TheStormExpert

Re: Possible SW Caribbean Development

#759 Postby TheStormExpert » Sat Oct 17, 2020 9:00 pm

LarryWx wrote:
aspen wrote:Here are the three moving parts in this scenario right now:

1.) Zeta’s gyre — the models have been struggling with the overall size of the area of spin, and many have tried to concentrate vorticity on the NE side. If the center of spin is smaller and becomes more concentrated, we would see earlier development more to the SW.

2.) Epsilon/94L — it’ll break down the ridge but only temporarily. Depending on how strong and fast or slow it is, either it’ll allow the ridge to rebuild and block Zeta, or it’ll drag Zeta to the NE.

3.) The Yucatán Low — a second lobe to the gyre/another area of low pressure moving from the GAs to the Yucatán is responsible for throwing Zeta into Cuba quicker on the GFS-Para. If it is rather strong, it will try to prevent Zeta from developing and push it towards the islands quicker. If it’s weaker, Zeta will have better luck developing.


I think the main controlling factor is how strong the SE US ridge will be. In recent years, it has been strong/persistent due to the very warm western Pacific making the last few winters mild in the SE US.

Right now we have a -NAO, but also have an -PNA. Not sure how that could affect things. Usually you need a -NAO and a +PNA to force colder weather down in these parts.
0 likes   

User avatar
ElectricStorm
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5044
Age: 24
Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2019 11:23 pm
Location: Skiatook, OK / Norman, OK

Re: Possible SW Caribbean Development

#760 Postby ElectricStorm » Sat Oct 17, 2020 9:02 pm

TheStormExpert wrote:
LarryWx wrote:
aspen wrote:Here are the three moving parts in this scenario right now:

1.) Zeta’s gyre — the models have been struggling with the overall size of the area of spin, and many have tried to concentrate vorticity on the NE side. If the center of spin is smaller and becomes more concentrated, we would see earlier development more to the SW.

2.) Epsilon/94L — it’ll break down the ridge but only temporarily. Depending on how strong and fast or slow it is, either it’ll allow the ridge to rebuild and block Zeta, or it’ll drag Zeta to the NE.

3.) The Yucatán Low — a second lobe to the gyre/another area of low pressure moving from the GAs to the Yucatán is responsible for throwing Zeta into Cuba quicker on the GFS-Para. If it is rather strong, it will try to prevent Zeta from developing and push it towards the islands quicker. If it’s weaker, Zeta will have better luck developing.


I think the main controlling factor is how strong the SE US ridge will be. In recent years, it has been strong/persistent due to the very warm western Pacific making the last few winters mild in the SE US.

Right now we have a -NAO, but also have an -PNA. Not sure how that could affect things. Usually you need a -NAO and a +PNA to force colder weather down in these parts.

What is the PNA and would a +PNA lead to more ridging?
0 likes   
B.S Meteorology, University of Oklahoma '25

Please refer to the NHC, NWS, or SPC for official information.


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: hurricanes1234, MarioProtVI, Stratton23 and 45 guests