supercane4867 wrote:https://i.imgur.com/UICdJOE.jpg
The HWRF was right about a much weaker SE quadrant. It’s been scarily accurate with a lot of systems this year.
Moderator: S2k Moderators
supercane4867 wrote:https://i.imgur.com/UICdJOE.jpg
aspen wrote:supercane4867 wrote:https://i.imgur.com/UICdJOE.jpg
The HWRF was right about a much weaker SE quadrant. It’s been scarily accurate with a lot of systems this year.
Blown Away wrote:NHC barely adjusted the track even with Eta bombing out in intensity, so the deeper stronger hurricane may move more poleward idea doesn’t seem to matter in this scenario.
Blown Away wrote:NHC barely adjusted the track even with Eta bombing out in intensity, so the deeper stronger hurricane may move more poleward idea doesn’t seem to matter in this scenario.
Kazmit wrote:Weather Dude wrote:LarryWx wrote:
Bump. So, nobody really knows the answer as to why a stronger Eta would mover further N/NE and, therefore, if that is even true?
Isn't it usually a stronger storm moves west? I haven't paid attention to all the steering factors with Eta though. I know there can be exceptions
No, stronger is usually more east.
SFLcane wrote:Blown Away wrote:NHC barely adjusted the track even with Eta bombing out in intensity, so the deeper stronger hurricane may move more poleward idea doesn’t seem to matter in this scenario.
Regardless there is growing consensus this will develop in the nw Caribbean and potentially threaten SFL.
skyline385 wrote:So when is next recon again?
CrazyC83 wrote:skyline385 wrote:So when is next recon again?
Arrives at 06Z. Leaves base around 02Z.
aspen wrote:CrazyC83 wrote:skyline385 wrote:So when is next recon again?
Arrives at 06Z. Leaves base around 02Z.
Good timing. The HWRF is expecting at least a Cat 2 hurricane by then, so recon will be able to confirm whether it’s right or not.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests