wxman57 wrote:NHC's 115kt estimate looks reasonable. Low-end Cat 4.
Mmm seems conservative honestly given T#s
I'd go with 125-130kt
Moderator: S2k Moderators
wxman57 wrote:NHC's 115kt estimate looks reasonable. Low-end Cat 4.
Blown Away wrote:CrazyC83 wrote:How strong is Eta now? If I were to make an estimate, I would go with 130 kt. Solid T6.5 when accounting for the fact that Dvorak does pinholes poorly.
https://i.imgur.com/XUzvYlE.jpg
I bet your right, Eta is amazing, but not perfect based on satellite only to justify above that. My amateur opinion only.
Chemmers wrote:Could it get to 8 maybe?
Aric Dunn wrote:Blown Away wrote:CrazyC83 wrote:How strong is Eta now? If I were to make an estimate, I would go with 130 kt. Solid T6.5 when accounting for the fact that Dvorak does pinholes poorly.
https://i.imgur.com/XUzvYlE.jpg
I bet your right, Eta is amazing, but not perfect based on satellite only to justify above that. My amateur opinion only.
That is the problem.. not every cat 5 is perfect.. they do not always fit the expected "look"
https://i.ibb.co/pdWmjBM/LABELS-19700101-000000-10.gif
Chemmers wrote:Could it get to 8 maybe?
Iceresistance wrote:Weather Dude wrote:SteveM wrote:
What does 7.5 mean, please?
It's the Dvorak T number estimate. T7.5 is a very powerful Cat 5
This might reach 7.7, there is a very solid pink ring on Eta.
EDIT: Well, I can't get the GIF on the pink ring of Eta to work.
Weather Dude wrote:Chemmers wrote:Could it get to 8 maybe?
I don't think it has enough time
Aric Dunn wrote:Blown Away wrote:CrazyC83 wrote:How strong is Eta now? If I were to make an estimate, I would go with 130 kt. Solid T6.5 when accounting for the fact that Dvorak does pinholes poorly.
https://i.imgur.com/XUzvYlE.jpg
I bet your right, Eta is amazing, but not perfect based on satellite only to justify above that. My amateur opinion only.
That is the problem.. not every cat 5 is perfect.. they do not always fit the expected "look"
https://i.ibb.co/pdWmjBM/LABELS-19700101-000000-10.gif
Cunxi Huang wrote:Iceresistance wrote:Weather Dude wrote:It's the Dvorak T number estimate. T7.5 is a very powerful Cat 5
This might reach 7.7, there is a very solid pink ring on Eta.
EDIT: Well, I can't get the GIF on the pink ring of Eta to work.
Well you can't get 7.7 if the eye can't clear up to WMG at least.
Aric Dunn wrote:Neither are perfect. small eyes often never completely clear out.
Wilma
https://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/satellite-blog/wp-content/uploads/2005/10/051019_g12_ir4_anim.gif
Eta
https://i.ibb.co/pdWmjBM/LABELS-19700101-000000-10.gif
Aric Dunn wrote:Neither are perfect. small eyes often never completely clear out.
Wilma
https://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/satellite-blog/wp-content/uploads/2005/10/051019_g12_ir4_anim.gif
Eta
https://i.ibb.co/pdWmjBM/LABELS-19700101-000000-10.gif
Aric Dunn wrote:Neither are perfect. small eyes often never completely clear out.
Wilma
https://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/satellite-blog/wp-content/uploads/2005/10/051019_g12_ir4_anim.gif
Eta
https://i.ibb.co/pdWmjBM/LABELS-19700101-000000-10.gif
Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 2 guests