eastcoastFL wrote:Shell Mound wrote:Ubuntwo wrote:It's definitely possible that interaction with Hispaniola completely kills off 97L without any reformations down the road. That's just one solution and certainly not 'likely' when considering model guidance as a whole. Two cents. The GFS, UKMet, CMC, Navy, HWRF, HMON, and HAFS all continue the system beyond 70W.
I am mainly relying on the EPS. While it tends to miss genesis, it is adept at diagnosing the time of dissipation, especially in somewhat marginal setups. In this case I think the combination of interaction with land and climatologically enhanced easterlies will act to destroy the circulation to the immediate south of Hispaniola. Even now, the fact that the centre appears to be consolidating on the northern side of the convective mass suggests that proximity to the dry trade inversion will be a problem within the next two to three days. As soon as this leaves the ITCZ it could fall apart very quickly. Yet we shall see.
I think EPS told the same exact story with Laura. It missed genesis and then constantly opened her up as a wave after Cuba and nothing close to that played out. I wouldn’t put much stock in it with a storm that has yet to develop like 97l, especially with support from other models. I hope that you’re correct but I don’t see any reason to put much faith in this scenario right now.
I would focus less on past performance and more on the current conditions, whether synoptic or thermodynamic. Visible and other satellite data indicate stratocumulus and low PWATs, along with SAL, to the immediate north and east of 97L. This is already likely to limit 97L’s development within the next few days. Even though 95L offered a bit of a reprieve, another bout of dry air is approaching, as the low-level ridging strengthens by day three. Beyond that timeframe, interaction with the Greater Antilles could combine with the strong easterlies to destroy 97L. Dennis and Laura occurred under different conditions, so I would not focus on those examples.