2021 Indicators: SST's / SAL / MSLP / Shear / Steering / Instability / Sat Images

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
AlphaToOmega
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1448
Joined: Sat Jun 26, 2021 10:51 am
Location: Somewhere in Massachusetts

Re: 2021 Indicators: SST's / SAL / MSLP / Shear / Steering / Instability / Sat Images

#1941 Postby AlphaToOmega » Fri Jul 30, 2021 6:35 am

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
1 likes   

User avatar
GCANE
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 11497
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 8:03 am

Re: 2021 Indicators: SST's / SAL / MSLP / Shear / Steering / Instability / Sat Images

#1942 Postby GCANE » Fri Jul 30, 2021 7:09 am

West CONUS Blocking High is forecast to breakdown and an Anticyclonic Rossby Wave Break may form from N Baja to Rio Grande Valley around Wednesday.
Need to watch if this moves into the GOM.
Could be an opportunity for development next weekend.
May also move into W Bahamas for possible development.

Imagepost pictures
0 likes   


Shell Mound
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2434
Age: 32
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2017 3:39 pm
Location: St. Petersburg, FL → Scandinavia

Re: 2021 Indicators: SST's / SAL / MSLP / Shear / Steering / Instability / Sat Images

#1944 Postby Shell Mound » Fri Jul 30, 2021 7:48 am

MarioProtVI wrote:
Shell Mound wrote:
MarioProtVI wrote:Not buying into the GFS’s EPac major spam. ... The monsoon trough setup could easily fix itself by late August and still contribute to a decent MDR season. Finally, the -AMO look is complete crap...

The latest ECMWF has shifted toward the GFS and now shows multiple strong hurricanes over the C/EPAC during the next few weeks. As far as the African monsoonal trough is concerned, the -VP over the IO during ASO should continue to contribute to highly amplified AEWs. These would tend to take their time to consolidate over the MDR, so if a secondary -VP cell is also present over the C/EPAC, it would likely shear any AEW that attempts to develop closer to the Caribbean and/or the islands. Regarding the -AMO, I was referring to the fact that the Canary Current remains cool, despite recent warming of the MDR. One would need to see significant warming over key areas such as the Canaries to be relatively certain that the MDR will continue to warm over time.

The canary current isn’t actually that cool at all. CDAS might be showing that because it’s biased towards cooling with SAL outbreaks making it look cooler then it actually is, thus I would use a different data set such as OISST or Coral Reef

The EPS is shifting toward a much stronger -VP cell over the EPAC through early September, so at this point I think the Atlantic season is going to underperform significantly. The entire month of August is basically going to be dead and early September looks to be far from hospitable for “homegrown” systems, given strong, convectively driven VWS emanating from the EPAC and impinging on the Caribbean. This is significant, because most people here have been expecting “homegrown” development to compensate for a potentially inactive MDR, yet the -VP cell over the EPAC would likely shut down the western part of the basin. Anything that forms there would need to occur along the northern Gulf Coast or off the East Coast, and such a system would be much more likely to be relatively weak than something that forms farther south, i.e., over the western Caribbean.
0 likes   
CVW / MiamiensisWx / Shell Mound
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the NHC and NWS.

Shell Mound
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2434
Age: 32
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2017 3:39 pm
Location: St. Petersburg, FL → Scandinavia

Re: 2021 Indicators: SST's / SAL / MSLP / Shear / Steering / Instability / Sat Images

#1945 Postby Shell Mound » Fri Jul 30, 2021 8:01 am

USTropics wrote:Shear is one of the most difficult parameters to forecast, even on an intermediate level (5-10) days. As such, skill level for seasonal shear forecasting is low, and a model blend is typically preferred. As an example, this was the shear forecast last year from the CFS for August and September:

https://i.imgur.com/Uf7NXok.png
https://i.imgur.com/gw7wGa6.png

Specifically for the Atlantic lead time weeks 1 and 2, the shear axis forecasted in the western Caribbean ended up being overestimated (and observed displaced more to the north over north GOM and CONUS). The CFS for lead time weeks 3 and 4 was also too aggressive on the prolonged TUTT axis extending into the Caribbean. Instead, we saw Marco and Laura form in the Caribbean.

Image
Aside from some minor issues with the placement of the anomalies, the basic verification (right) looks fairly similar to the forecast (left).
0 likes   
CVW / MiamiensisWx / Shell Mound
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the NHC and NWS.

User avatar
SFLcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10163
Age: 47
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 1:44 pm
Location: Lake Worth Florida

Re: 2021 Indicators: SST's / SAL / MSLP / Shear / Steering / Instability / Sat Images

#1946 Postby SFLcane » Fri Jul 30, 2021 8:04 am

Shell Mound wrote:
MarioProtVI wrote:
Shell Mound wrote:The latest ECMWF has shifted toward the GFS and now shows multiple strong hurricanes over the C/EPAC during the next few weeks. As far as the African monsoonal trough is concerned, the -VP over the IO during ASO should continue to contribute to highly amplified AEWs. These would tend to take their time to consolidate over the MDR, so if a secondary -VP cell is also present over the C/EPAC, it would likely shear any AEW that attempts to develop closer to the Caribbean and/or the islands. Regarding the -AMO, I was referring to the fact that the Canary Current remains cool, despite recent warming of the MDR. One would need to see significant warming over key areas such as the Canaries to be relatively certain that the MDR will continue to warm over time.

The canary current isn’t actually that cool at all. CDAS might be showing that because it’s biased towards cooling with SAL outbreaks making it look cooler then it actually is, thus I would use a different data set such as OISST or Coral Reef

The EPS is shifting toward a much stronger -VP cell over the EPAC through early September, so at this point I think the Atlantic season is going to underperform significantly. The entire month of August is basically going to be dead and early September looks to be far from hospitable for “homegrown” systems, given strong, convectively driven VWS emanating from the EPAC and impinging on the Caribbean. This is significant, because most people here have been expecting “homegrown” development to compensate for a potentially inactive MDR, yet the -VP cell over the EPAC would likely shut down the western part of the basin. Anything that forms there would need to occur along the northern Gulf Coast or off the East Coast, and such a system would be much more likely to be relatively weak than something that forms farther south, i.e., over the western Caribbean.


Season is over. :roll:
3 likes   

AlphaToOmega
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1448
Joined: Sat Jun 26, 2021 10:51 am
Location: Somewhere in Massachusetts

Re: 2021 Indicators: SST's / SAL / MSLP / Shear / Steering / Instability / Sat Images

#1947 Postby AlphaToOmega » Fri Jul 30, 2021 8:06 am

Image
A -VP EPac cell does not mean an inactive season.
4 likes   

SconnieCane
Category 4
Category 4
Posts: 998
Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2018 5:29 pm
Location: Madison, WI

Re: 2021 Indicators: SST's / SAL / MSLP / Shear / Steering / Instability / Sat Images

#1948 Postby SconnieCane » Fri Jul 30, 2021 8:09 am

InfernoFlameCat wrote:
SconnieCane wrote:
aspen wrote:The OISST seems to have a warm bias. On the CRW map, it’s 0.24C above average. Both agree that the Gulf is roughly 0.55-0.65C warmer that normal, but are very different with the Caribbean: +0.81C (OISST) vs +0.39C (CRW). Regardless, everything is running warmer than average now.

The mean SSTs in the Gulf have risen to 30.01C. This combined with the extra-warm Loop Current really make me concerned about something going bonkers in the Gulf, if it’s given the optimal moisture and shear/UL setup.


The Gulf has been on a tear of late with Harvey (to a lesser extent Nate), Michael, and Hanna/Laura/Sally/Delta/Zeta, only taking 2019 off out of the last four seasons as far as producing hurricanes, some of them major. And they are not following the old "rule" according to the likes of Opal, Ivan, Katrina, Rita, etc; and maintaining or even continuing to intensify at landfall. If that trend doesn't continue in 2021, it won't be because of SSTs/OHC. :eek:

Ugly Barry started crying in the background.


Whoops, forgot about that abomination (also Marco, although it didn't make landfall as such). So, we actually are on an unbroken four-season streak of hurricanes in the Gulf, three of them with at least one major hurricane.
1 likes   

AlphaToOmega
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1448
Joined: Sat Jun 26, 2021 10:51 am
Location: Somewhere in Massachusetts

Re: 2021 Indicators: SST's / SAL / MSLP / Shear / Steering / Instability / Sat Images

#1949 Postby AlphaToOmega » Fri Jul 30, 2021 8:10 am

Image
2005 illustrates this point quite nicely. The year of Dennis, Emily, Katrina, Rita, Wilma, and Beta, all Western Atlantic hurricanes, had a -VP cell over the East Pacific. It is dangerous to cancel a season over an EPac cell.
8 likes   

MarioProtVI
Category 4
Category 4
Posts: 935
Age: 24
Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2019 7:33 pm
Location: New Jersey

Re: 2021 Indicators: SST's / SAL / MSLP / Shear / Steering / Instability / Sat Images

#1950 Postby MarioProtVI » Fri Jul 30, 2021 8:13 am

Shell Mound wrote:
MarioProtVI wrote:
Shell Mound wrote:The latest ECMWF has shifted toward the GFS and now shows multiple strong hurricanes over the C/EPAC during the next few weeks. As far as the African monsoonal trough is concerned, the -VP over the IO during ASO should continue to contribute to highly amplified AEWs. These would tend to take their time to consolidate over the MDR, so if a secondary -VP cell is also present over the C/EPAC, it would likely shear any AEW that attempts to develop closer to the Caribbean and/or the islands. Regarding the -AMO, I was referring to the fact that the Canary Current remains cool, despite recent warming of the MDR. One would need to see significant warming over key areas such as the Canaries to be relatively certain that the MDR will continue to warm over time.

The canary current isn’t actually that cool at all. CDAS might be showing that because it’s biased towards cooling with SAL outbreaks making it look cooler then it actually is, thus I would use a different data set such as OISST or Coral Reef

The EPS is shifting toward a much stronger -VP cell over the EPAC through early September, so at this point I think the Atlantic season is going to underperform significantly. The entire month of August is basically going to be dead and early September looks to be far from hospitable for “homegrown” systems, given strong, convectively driven VWS emanating from the EPAC and impinging on the Caribbean. This is significant, because most people here have been expecting “homegrown” development to compensate for a potentially inactive MDR, yet the -VP cell over the EPAC would likely shut down the western part of the basin. Anything that forms there would need to occur along the northern Gulf Coast or off the East Coast, and such a system would be much more likely to be relatively weak than something that forms farther south, i.e., over the western Caribbean.

:spam:
Literally all other factors point to an above-average season. I don’t know why you’re so confident the Atlantic is going to underperform and your basically suggesting the season might 2013 itself. Come November 30 I am 100% certain that is going to age poorly. Things can change quickly and models are not all the same and can verify poorly like last year.
5 likes   

User avatar
aspen
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8818
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 7:10 pm
Location: Connecticut, USA

Re: 2021 Indicators: SST's / SAL / MSLP / Shear / Steering / Instability / Sat Images

#1951 Postby aspen » Fri Jul 30, 2021 8:15 am

AlphaToOmega wrote:https://i.postimg.cc/5tkmLNTW/msfh-UYym-SL.png
A -VP EPac cell does not mean an inactive season.

2001 might be a good analogue year, although I think 2021 will probably outperform it a bit. That season saw a July MDR depression, multiple low-latitude systems (Chantal, Iris, Jerry), and late season WCar activity. This year, the low ITCZ will help favor lower-latitude MDR systems, and the onset of a La Niña combined with the favorable VP setup forecast for October-November seems like it’ll favor late-season activity like 2001 and 2020 (although hopefully nowhere near as insane as the latter). What was the VP setup in August 2001?
1 likes   
Irene '11 Sandy '12 Hermine '16 5/15/2018 Derecho Fay '20 Isaias '20 Elsa '21 Henri '21 Ida '21

I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.

AlphaToOmega
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1448
Joined: Sat Jun 26, 2021 10:51 am
Location: Somewhere in Massachusetts

Re: 2021 Indicators: SST's / SAL / MSLP / Shear / Steering / Instability / Sat Images

#1952 Postby AlphaToOmega » Fri Jul 30, 2021 8:17 am

aspen wrote:
AlphaToOmega wrote:https://i.postimg.cc/5tkmLNTW/msfh-UYym-SL.png
A -VP EPac cell does not mean an inactive season.

2001 might be a good analogue year, although I think 2021 will probably outperform it a bit. That season saw a July MDR depression, multiple low-latitude systems (Chantal, Iris, Jerry), and late season WCar activity. This year, the low ITCZ will help favor lower-latitude MDR systems, and the onset of a La Niña combined with the favorable VP setup forecast for October-November seems like it’ll favor late-season activity like 2001 and 2020 (although hopefully nowhere near as insane as the latter). What was the VP setup in August 2001?

Image
This setup is theoretically terrible for Atlantic tropical activity; but Barry, Chantal, and Dean would say otherwise.
Last edited by AlphaToOmega on Fri Jul 30, 2021 8:26 am, edited 1 time in total.
2 likes   

User avatar
Category5Kaiju
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4097
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2020 12:45 pm
Location: Seattle

Re: 2021 Indicators: SST's / SAL / MSLP / Shear / Steering / Instability / Sat Images

#1953 Postby Category5Kaiju » Fri Jul 30, 2021 8:18 am

SconnieCane wrote:
InfernoFlameCat wrote:
SconnieCane wrote:
The Gulf has been on a tear of late with Harvey (to a lesser extent Nate), Michael, and Hanna/Laura/Sally/Delta/Zeta, only taking 2019 off out of the last four seasons as far as producing hurricanes, some of them major. And they are not following the old "rule" according to the likes of Opal, Ivan, Katrina, Rita, etc; and maintaining or even continuing to intensify at landfall. If that trend doesn't continue in 2021, it won't be because of SSTs/OHC. :eek:

Ugly Barry started crying in the background.


Whoops, forgot about that abomination (also Marco, although it didn't make landfall as such). So, we actually are on an unbroken four-season streak of hurricanes in the Gulf, three of them with at least one major hurricane.


In terms of major hurricanes in the Gulf, we have 2017, 2018, and 2020. 2019 is the exception, but boy did the recent years feature many RI Gulf storms!
1 likes   
Unless explicitly stated, all info in my posts is based on my own opinions and observations. Tropical storms and hurricanes can be extremely dangerous. Do not think you can beat Mother Nature. Refer to an accredited weather research agency or meteorologist if you need to make serious decisions regarding an approaching storm.

User avatar
SFLcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10163
Age: 47
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 1:44 pm
Location: Lake Worth Florida

Re: 2021 Indicators: SST's / SAL / MSLP / Shear / Steering / Instability / Sat Images

#1954 Postby SFLcane » Fri Jul 30, 2021 8:21 am

AlphaToOmega wrote:https://i.postimg.cc/T1x5WzdX/uk1824-Tqdx.png
2005 illustrates this point quite nicely. The year of Dennis, Emily, Katrina, Rita, Wilma, and Beta, all Western Atlantic hurricanes, had a -VP cell over the East Pacific. It is dangerous to cancel a season over an EPac cell.


It’s smaller though
1 likes   

User avatar
Category5Kaiju
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4097
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2020 12:45 pm
Location: Seattle

Re: 2021 Indicators: SST's / SAL / MSLP / Shear / Steering / Instability / Sat Images

#1955 Postby Category5Kaiju » Fri Jul 30, 2021 8:23 am

MarioProtVI wrote:
Shell Mound wrote:
MarioProtVI wrote:The canary current isn’t actually that cool at all. CDAS might be showing that because it’s biased towards cooling with SAL outbreaks making it look cooler then it actually is, thus I would use a different data set such as OISST or Coral Reef

The EPS is shifting toward a much stronger -VP cell over the EPAC through early September, so at this point I think the Atlantic season is going to underperform significantly. The entire month of August is basically going to be dead and early September looks to be far from hospitable for “homegrown” systems, given strong, convectively driven VWS emanating from the EPAC and impinging on the Caribbean. This is significant, because most people here have been expecting “homegrown” development to compensate for a potentially inactive MDR, yet the -VP cell over the EPAC would likely shut down the western part of the basin. Anything that forms there would need to occur along the northern Gulf Coast or off the East Coast, and such a system would be much more likely to be relatively weak than something that forms farther south, i.e., over the western Caribbean.

:spam:
Literally all other factors point to an above-average season. I don’t know why you’re so confident the Atlantic is going to underperform and your basically suggesting the season might 2013 itself. Come November 30 I am 100% certain that is going to age poorly. Things can change quickly and models are not all the same and can verify poorly like last year.


Well I will say (and this is not a critique of Shell Mound of course and I don’t intend it to be in any way), but I think when it comes down to S2K posters, we all have our own levels of how active and optimistic we are for a certain season (especially if it has not started yet), and Shell Mound is perhaps one of S2K’s most conservative posters when it comes down to this. :D
3 likes   
Unless explicitly stated, all info in my posts is based on my own opinions and observations. Tropical storms and hurricanes can be extremely dangerous. Do not think you can beat Mother Nature. Refer to an accredited weather research agency or meteorologist if you need to make serious decisions regarding an approaching storm.

User avatar
aspen
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8818
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 7:10 pm
Location: Connecticut, USA

Re: 2021 Indicators: SST's / SAL / MSLP / Shear / Steering / Instability / Sat Images

#1956 Postby aspen » Fri Jul 30, 2021 8:27 am

Shell Mound wrote:
MarioProtVI wrote:
Shell Mound wrote:The latest ECMWF has shifted toward the GFS and now shows multiple strong hurricanes over the C/EPAC during the next few weeks. As far as the African monsoonal trough is concerned, the -VP over the IO during ASO should continue to contribute to highly amplified AEWs. These would tend to take their time to consolidate over the MDR, so if a secondary -VP cell is also present over the C/EPAC, it would likely shear any AEW that attempts to develop closer to the Caribbean and/or the islands. Regarding the -AMO, I was referring to the fact that the Canary Current remains cool, despite recent warming of the MDR. One would need to see significant warming over key areas such as the Canaries to be relatively certain that the MDR will continue to warm over time.

The canary current isn’t actually that cool at all. CDAS might be showing that because it’s biased towards cooling with SAL outbreaks making it look cooler then it actually is, thus I would use a different data set such as OISST or Coral Reef

The EPS is shifting toward a much stronger -VP cell over the EPAC through early September, so at this point I think the Atlantic season is going to underperform significantly. The entire month of August is basically going to be dead and early September looks to be far from hospitable for “homegrown” systems, given strong, convectively driven VWS emanating from the EPAC and impinging on the Caribbean. This is significant, because most people here have been expecting “homegrown” development to compensate for a potentially inactive MDR, yet the -VP cell over the EPAC would likely shut down the western part of the basin. Anything that forms there would need to occur along the northern Gulf Coast or off the East Coast, and such a system would be much more likely to be relatively weak than something that forms farther south, i.e., over the western Caribbean.

If this wasn’t a weak Nina year then that could be possible. However, because of that -ENSO, the EPac will struggle even with a -VP cell. Many storms have struggled to intensify this season, and while Felicia was able to find success, it didn’t undergo RI until it was far from Mexico. If future systems continue to follow these trends — which seems probable based on the progress of 99E and 90E — shear from a bunch of strong EPac storms probably will not be an issue. Also, as Alpha has pointed out, there are other examples of seasons ranging from “typical” above-normal to hyperactive that saw a -VP cell sometime during ASO, so it’s not a season killer, especially when -ENSO is on the Atlantic’s side. The -VP cell might prevent the Caribbean from being ultra-favorable like last year and perhaps limit some storms, but it won’t prevent systems that people will need to watch out for.
5 likes   
Irene '11 Sandy '12 Hermine '16 5/15/2018 Derecho Fay '20 Isaias '20 Elsa '21 Henri '21 Ida '21

I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.

User avatar
aspen
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8818
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 7:10 pm
Location: Connecticut, USA

Re: 2021 Indicators: SST's / SAL / MSLP / Shear / Steering / Instability / Sat Images

#1957 Postby aspen » Fri Jul 30, 2021 8:28 am

AlphaToOmega wrote:
aspen wrote:
AlphaToOmega wrote:https://i.postimg.cc/5tkmLNTW/msfh-UYym-SL.png
A -VP EPac cell does not mean an inactive season.

2001 might be a good analogue year, although I think 2021 will probably outperform it a bit. That season saw a July MDR depression, multiple low-latitude systems (Chantal, Iris, Jerry), and late season WCar activity. This year, the low ITCZ will help favor lower-latitude MDR systems, and the onset of a La Niña combined with the favorable VP setup forecast for October-November seems like it’ll favor late-season activity like 2001 and 2020 (although hopefully nowhere near as insane as the latter). What was the VP setup in August 2001?

https://i.postimg.cc/HkYKtnZr/Uzkn-BSd-Th.png
This setup is theoretically terrible for Atlantic tropical activity; but Barry, Chantal, and Dean would say otherwise.

Okay scratch that, 2001 is an awful analogue year. The rising branch is way too far east compared to 2021 and the last few years.
3 likes   
Irene '11 Sandy '12 Hermine '16 5/15/2018 Derecho Fay '20 Isaias '20 Elsa '21 Henri '21 Ida '21

I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.

User avatar
Category5Kaiju
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4097
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2020 12:45 pm
Location: Seattle

Re: 2021 Indicators: SST's / SAL / MSLP / Shear / Steering / Instability / Sat Images

#1958 Postby Category5Kaiju » Fri Jul 30, 2021 8:34 am

aspen wrote:
Shell Mound wrote:
MarioProtVI wrote:The canary current isn’t actually that cool at all. CDAS might be showing that because it’s biased towards cooling with SAL outbreaks making it look cooler then it actually is, thus I would use a different data set such as OISST or Coral Reef

The EPS is shifting toward a much stronger -VP cell over the EPAC through early September, so at this point I think the Atlantic season is going to underperform significantly. The entire month of August is basically going to be dead and early September looks to be far from hospitable for “homegrown” systems, given strong, convectively driven VWS emanating from the EPAC and impinging on the Caribbean. This is significant, because most people here have been expecting “homegrown” development to compensate for a potentially inactive MDR, yet the -VP cell over the EPAC would likely shut down the western part of the basin. Anything that forms there would need to occur along the northern Gulf Coast or off the East Coast, and such a system would be much more likely to be relatively weak than something that forms farther south, i.e., over the western Caribbean.

If this wasn’t a weak Nina year then that could be possible. However, because of that -ENSO, the EPac will struggle even with a -VP cell. Many storms have struggled to intensify this season, and while Felicia was able to find success, it didn’t undergo RI until it was far from Mexico. If future systems continue to follow these trends — which seems probable based on the progress of 99E and 90E — shear from a bunch of strong EPac storms probably will not be an issue. Also, as Alpha has pointed out, there are other examples of seasons ranging from “typical” above-normal to hyperactive that saw a -VP cell sometime during ASO, so it’s not a season killer, especially when -ENSO is on the Atlantic’s side. The -VP cell might prevent the Caribbean from being ultra-favorable like last year and perhaps limit some storms, but it won’t prevent systems that people will need to watch out for.


Well said! If - VP cell over the EPAC is such a killer for the Atlantic, then I would have to think forecasting agencies would take note of it? From my understanding no forecasting agency has said we’re headed toward a less active season just because a -VP cell is expected (or, I mean, how do we even know for sure it will stick around during ASO?) There are way more variables that dictate Atlantic activity than just a -VP EPAC cell
0 likes   
Unless explicitly stated, all info in my posts is based on my own opinions and observations. Tropical storms and hurricanes can be extremely dangerous. Do not think you can beat Mother Nature. Refer to an accredited weather research agency or meteorologist if you need to make serious decisions regarding an approaching storm.

AlphaToOmega
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1448
Joined: Sat Jun 26, 2021 10:51 am
Location: Somewhere in Massachusetts

Re: 2021 Indicators: SST's / SAL / MSLP / Shear / Steering / Instability / Sat Images

#1959 Postby AlphaToOmega » Fri Jul 30, 2021 8:39 am

aspen wrote:
AlphaToOmega wrote:
aspen wrote:2001 might be a good analogue year, although I think 2021 will probably outperform it a bit. That season saw a July MDR depression, multiple low-latitude systems (Chantal, Iris, Jerry), and late season WCar activity. This year, the low ITCZ will help favor lower-latitude MDR systems, and the onset of a La Niña combined with the favorable VP setup forecast for October-November seems like it’ll favor late-season activity like 2001 and 2020 (although hopefully nowhere near as insane as the latter). What was the VP setup in August 2001?

https://i.postimg.cc/HkYKtnZr/Uzkn-BSd-Th.png
This setup is theoretically terrible for Atlantic tropical activity; but Barry, Chantal, and Dean would say otherwise.

Okay scratch that, 2001 is an awful analogue year. The rising branch is way too far east compared to 2021 and the last few years.

ASO 2001
Image
0 likes   

User avatar
NotSparta
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 1670
Age: 23
Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2017 8:24 am
Location: Naples, FL
Contact:

Re: 2021 Indicators: SST's / SAL / MSLP / Shear / Steering / Instability / Sat Images

#1960 Postby NotSparta » Fri Jul 30, 2021 8:40 am

Shell Mound wrote:
MarioProtVI wrote:
Shell Mound wrote:The latest ECMWF has shifted toward the GFS and now shows multiple strong hurricanes over the C/EPAC during the next few weeks. As far as the African monsoonal trough is concerned, the -VP over the IO during ASO should continue to contribute to highly amplified AEWs. These would tend to take their time to consolidate over the MDR, so if a secondary -VP cell is also present over the C/EPAC, it would likely shear any AEW that attempts to develop closer to the Caribbean and/or the islands. Regarding the -AMO, I was referring to the fact that the Canary Current remains cool, despite recent warming of the MDR. One would need to see significant warming over key areas such as the Canaries to be relatively certain that the MDR will continue to warm over time.

The canary current isn’t actually that cool at all. CDAS might be showing that because it’s biased towards cooling with SAL outbreaks making it look cooler then it actually is, thus I would use a different data set such as OISST or Coral Reef

The EPS is shifting toward a much stronger -VP cell over the EPAC through early September, so at this point I think the Atlantic season is going to underperform significantly. The entire month of August is basically going to be dead and early September looks to be far from hospitable for “homegrown” systems, given strong, convectively driven VWS emanating from the EPAC and impinging on the Caribbean. This is significant, because most people here have been expecting “homegrown” development to compensate for a potentially inactive MDR, yet the -VP cell over the EPAC would likely shut down the western part of the basin. Anything that forms there would need to occur along the northern Gulf Coast or off the East Coast, and such a system would be much more likely to be relatively weak than something that forms farther south, i.e., over the western Caribbean.


You could've just said 2013 :P
3 likes   
This post was probably an opinion of mine, and in no way is official. Please refer to http://www.hurricanes.gov for official tropical analysis and advisories.

My website, with lots of tropical wx graphics, including satellite and recon: http://cyclonicwx.com


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: AnnularCane and 40 guests