ATL: FRED - Post-Tropical - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
tolakram
Admin
Admin
Posts: 20009
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Discussion

#201 Postby tolakram » Mon Aug 09, 2021 8:57 am

6 likes   
M a r k
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.

Shell Mound
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2434
Age: 32
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2017 3:39 pm
Location: St. Petersburg, FL → Scandinavia

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Discussion

#202 Postby Shell Mound » Mon Aug 09, 2021 8:59 am

Shell Mound wrote:
SFLcane wrote:Could be a batch of showers or a tropical cyclone SFL at this point who knows.

https://i.postimg.cc/8cTXKN4g/29423-A2-F-EEF5-4-D59-8480-9777-AFA24436.png

https://twitter.com/JackSillin/status/1424730715225161735
At this point I’d bet on “patch of showers.” There is a strong consensus that the ULL near Florida will impart sufficient VWS to prevent strengthening.

Only 11/51 ECMWF ensemble members depict a closed cyclone by the time shown above (five days from now). Only 1/51 members depicts a tropical cyclone of appreciable intensity (the 995mb outlier would be a strong tropical storm). ...

One such low looks to be located over Florida as 94L enters the Bahamas. These lows are a great source of wind shear and dry air, two things that strongly inhibit tropical cyclone development. Given this upper-level pattern, I would be surprised if anything more than a few gusty showers made it all the way to Florida by next weekend.

Source
0 likes   
CVW / MiamiensisWx / Shell Mound
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the NHC and NWS.

User avatar
GCANE
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 11496
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 8:03 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Discussion

#203 Postby GCANE » Mon Aug 09, 2021 9:00 am

A long-duration high-helicity tower fired this morning.
Likely pushed mid-level vort to the surface.
Let's see if it refires.
5 likes   

User avatar
Evil Jeremy
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5463
Age: 32
Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2006 2:10 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Discussion

#204 Postby Evil Jeremy » Mon Aug 09, 2021 9:03 am

I'm finding several parallels between 94L and Isaias (one year and one week ago). Similar time of year, approach to the region, model projections at the comparable point in time, the notion that conditions in the Bahamas will be slightly less inhibitive than previously expected (which I'm gleaming from the Models thread this morning)...

Worth remembering how much uncertainty Isaias presented Florida. First it was going to miss us to the east, then go right up the Peninsula, then up the west coast to perhaps the Big Bend, then back down the middle, and finally back to scraping by the east coast. All of that in about a 48 hour span. So way to early to make predictions about Florida over the weekend.

Similar to 94L so far, Isaias failed to pick up latitude like it was projected to for several days as it approached and crossed through the Lesser Antilles, before catching up via center-reformations to the N. I wouldn't count out the same scenario for 94L.
8 likes   
Frances 04 / Jeanne 04 / Katrina 05 / Wilma 05 / Fay 08 / Debby 12 / Andrea 13 / Colin 16 / Hermine 16 / Matthew 16 / Irma 17

Shell Mound
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2434
Age: 32
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2017 3:39 pm
Location: St. Petersburg, FL → Scandinavia

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Discussion

#205 Postby Shell Mound » Mon Aug 09, 2021 9:05 am

Evil Jeremy wrote:the notion that conditions in the Bahamas will be slightly less inhibitive than previously expected

The key word is “slightly.” Also, I don’t see much evidence of this statement in the most reliable guidance (EPS). The ULL will likely kill 94L/Fred pre-Florida.

Essentially, the setup is too marginal and the margin of error too high for South Florida to realistically expect more than locally enhanced precipitation.
1 likes   
CVW / MiamiensisWx / Shell Mound
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the NHC and NWS.

User avatar
SoupBone
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3111
Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2005 5:24 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Discussion

#206 Postby SoupBone » Mon Aug 09, 2021 9:10 am

AutoPenalti wrote:
Aric Dunn wrote:
SoupBone wrote:

What's pushing it or potentially pushing it more NW? Is the high eroding or supposed to in that area?


I still have yet to find a mechanism for the sudden wnw to NW motion. Hence why it still has not made that turn yet. more southerly shifts to come it seems.

Weak Mid-level ridging seems to be the culprit, but that's only dependent on whether the center relocates further north.


Still, this track has a more Fall look to it, heading up the spine of the islands into Florida. At least for the given moment anyway.
2 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Evil Jeremy
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5463
Age: 32
Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2006 2:10 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Discussion

#207 Postby Evil Jeremy » Mon Aug 09, 2021 9:14 am

Shell Mound wrote:
Evil Jeremy wrote:the notion that conditions in the Bahamas will be slightly less inhibitive than previously expected

The key word is “slightly.” Also, I don’t see much evidence of this statement in the most reliable guidance (EPS). The ULL will likely kill 94L/Fred pre-Florida.

Essentially, the setup is too marginal and the margin of error too high for South Florida to realistically expect more than locally enhanced precipitation.


I sure hope so, but I’ve seen “heavy shear in 5 days” fail to pan out on several occasions.
1 likes   
Frances 04 / Jeanne 04 / Katrina 05 / Wilma 05 / Fay 08 / Debby 12 / Andrea 13 / Colin 16 / Hermine 16 / Matthew 16 / Irma 17

User avatar
Tireman4
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5853
Age: 59
Joined: Fri Jun 30, 2006 1:08 pm
Location: Humble, Texas
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Discussion

#208 Postby Tireman4 » Mon Aug 09, 2021 9:15 am

Interesting days and weeks ahead. I think we are just ramping up
0 likes   

User avatar
mpic
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 622
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2005 11:24 am
Location: Splendora, TX

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Discussion

#209 Postby mpic » Mon Aug 09, 2021 9:18 am

How long is the High over Texas forecasted to stay in place?
1 likes   
Alicia, Rita, Ike, Harvey and Beryl...moved to Splendora lol

Shell Mound
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2434
Age: 32
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2017 3:39 pm
Location: St. Petersburg, FL → Scandinavia

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Discussion

#210 Postby Shell Mound » Mon Aug 09, 2021 9:18 am

Evil Jeremy wrote:
Shell Mound wrote:
Evil Jeremy wrote:the notion that conditions in the Bahamas will be slightly less inhibitive than previously expected

The key word is “slightly.” Also, I don’t see much evidence of this statement in the most reliable guidance (EPS). The ULL will likely kill 94L/Fred pre-Florida.

Essentially, the setup is too marginal and the margin of error too high for South Florida to realistically expect more than locally enhanced precipitation.

I sure hope so, but I’ve seen “heavy shear in 5 days” fail to pan out on several occasions.

Both reliable models and meteorologists agree that the shear will be significant and likely preclude anything stronger than a low-end TS in South Florida. Furthermore, we’re talking about South Florida. Over the past several seasons we’ve seen quite a few situations that ended up being less dire for South Florida than originally feared: Matthew, Irma, and Dorian, among others, to not mention other systems that ended up turning away or being weaker at the time of their closest passes. Plus, in this case, we are dealing with Hispaniola as well as a vigorous ULL. Given that 94L is a small system, it will be even more susceptible to structural hindrances. Things could change, of course, but as of now I don’t think South FL should be worried. Fortunately, 94L’s compact size also minimises the threat of widespread heavy rainfall in the islands, at least to some degree.
1 likes   
CVW / MiamiensisWx / Shell Mound
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the NHC and NWS.

User avatar
SFLcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10163
Age: 47
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 1:44 pm
Location: Lake Worth Florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Discussion

#211 Postby SFLcane » Mon Aug 09, 2021 9:24 am

Nope, just a sharp wave.

For now atleast

Image
6 likes   

User avatar
SoupBone
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3111
Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2005 5:24 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Discussion

#212 Postby SoupBone » Mon Aug 09, 2021 9:27 am

mpic wrote:How long is the High over Texas forecasted to stay in place?


I hope until October! :lol:
1 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
HurricaneEnzo
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 739
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2018 12:18 pm
Location: Newport, NC (Hurricane Alley)

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Discussion

#213 Postby HurricaneEnzo » Mon Aug 09, 2021 9:41 am

May come down to how this system deals with the E Carib 'graveyard'. Conditions seem favorable in the short term. If it gains much latitude looks like it will be getting into moderate wind shear though. It needs to stay South. Definitely has an advantage over Elsa and that is slower forward speed. Moving at about 10-15mph as opposed to 28mph.
Last edited by HurricaneEnzo on Mon Aug 09, 2021 10:05 am, edited 1 time in total.
8 likes   
Bertha 96' - Fran 96' - Bonnie 98' - Dennis 99' - Floyd 99' - Isabel 03' - Alex 04' - Ophelia 05' - Irene 11' - Arthur 14' - Matthew 16' - Florence 18' - Dorian 19' - Isaias 20' (countless other tropical storms and Hurricane swipes)

I am not a Professional Met just an enthusiast. Get your weather forecasts from the Pros!

User avatar
aspen
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8818
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 7:10 pm
Location: Connecticut, USA

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Discussion

#214 Postby aspen » Mon Aug 09, 2021 9:44 am

SFLcane wrote:Nope, just a sharp wave.

For now atleast

https://i.postimg.cc/mDZ8wSB2/EE02509-E-5-E5-B-4-AB9-80-B8-DB0-D5-A615921.jpg

Still worthy of a PTC designation because of how close it is to land. I don’t know why the NHC hasn’t given it one already.
4 likes   
Irene '11 Sandy '12 Hermine '16 5/15/2018 Derecho Fay '20 Isaias '20 Elsa '21 Henri '21 Ida '21

I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.

AlphaToOmega
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1448
Joined: Sat Jun 26, 2021 10:51 am
Location: Somewhere in Massachusetts

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Discussion

#215 Postby AlphaToOmega » Mon Aug 09, 2021 9:46 am

Only a little bit of westerly flow is required to make this a tropical cyclone.
0 likes   

User avatar
abajan
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4230
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2003 5:10 am
Location: Barbados

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Discussion

#216 Postby abajan » Mon Aug 09, 2021 9:47 am

[youtube]https://youtu.be/TDekhjZpRf4[/youtube]
2 likes   

User avatar
Blown Away
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10145
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 6:17 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Discussion

#217 Postby Blown Away » Mon Aug 09, 2021 9:55 am

Image

Appears to be gaining latitude at WNW...
2 likes   
Hurricane Eye Experience: David 79, Irene 99, Frances 04, Jeanne 04, Wilma 05... EYE COMING MY WAY IN 2024…
Hurricane Brush Experience: Andrew 92, Erin 95, Floyd 99, Matthew 16, Irma 17, Ian 22, Nicole 22…

AlphaToOmega
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1448
Joined: Sat Jun 26, 2021 10:51 am
Location: Somewhere in Massachusetts

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Discussion

#218 Postby AlphaToOmega » Mon Aug 09, 2021 10:02 am

Surface analysis shows a closed low.
Image
3 likes   

Sciencerocks
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9155
Age: 39
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2017 1:51 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Discussion

#219 Postby Sciencerocks » Mon Aug 09, 2021 10:05 am

Image
0 likes   

sma10
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1710
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 1:13 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Discussion

#220 Postby sma10 » Mon Aug 09, 2021 10:11 am

Shell Mound wrote:
Evil Jeremy wrote:the notion that conditions in the Bahamas will be slightly less inhibitive than previously expected

The key word is “slightly.” Also, I don’t see much evidence of this statement in the most reliable guidance (EPS). The ULL will likely kill 94L/Fred pre-Florida.

Essentially, the setup is too marginal and the margin of error too high for South Florida to realistically expect more than locally enhanced precipitation.


Do you have any evidence for your claims, other than model depictions of shear maps several days out on a system that is still not classified? Don't get me wrong - opinions are free and models are outstanding tools, but your overconfidence seems unfounded (or at the very least overblown). A lot of us remember back to last year where the models missed genesis and strengthening repeatedly.
14 likes   


Return to “2021”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests