ATL: IDA - Remnants - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145298
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#361 Postby cycloneye » Thu Aug 26, 2021 7:44 am

12z Best Track:

99L INVEST 210826 1200 16.4N 79.0W ATL 30 1005


Image
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

xironman
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2522
Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2007 4:53 pm
Location: NoVA

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#362 Postby xironman » Thu Aug 26, 2021 7:44 am

jaxfladude wrote:When Will We Get Some Solid Idea Of Where 99L/Ida Will Go? Tired of the waiting game so to speak...


Once the models get the data from this flight

FLIGHT TWO - NOAA 49
A. 27/1200Z
B. NOAA9 O209A CYCLONE
C. 27/0530Z
D. NA
E. NA
F. 41,000 TO 45,000 FT
0 likes   

jaxfladude
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1249
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 9:36 pm
Location: Jacksonville, Fla

Re: RE: Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#363 Postby jaxfladude » Thu Aug 26, 2021 7:47 am

xironman wrote:
jaxfladude wrote:When Will We Get Some Solid Idea Of Where 99L/Ida Will Go? Tired of the waiting game so to speak...


Once the models get the data from this flight

FLIGHT TWO - NOAA 49
A. 27/1200Z
B. NOAA9 O209A CYCLONE
C. 27/0530Z
D. NA
E. NA
F. 41,000 TO 45,000 FT
18z set of models or too soon for those models? 0z set of models should have the abovementioned data?
Thanks!
0 likes   
Stay safe y'all

Javlin
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1620
Age: 64
Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2004 7:58 pm
Location: ms gulf coast

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#364 Postby Javlin » Thu Aug 26, 2021 7:59 am

Can see what looks W inflow GC might be a depression now

https://www.weathernerds.org/satellite/ ... nitsst=Off
0 likes   

BobHarlem
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2105
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2005 6:11 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#365 Postby BobHarlem » Thu Aug 26, 2021 8:02 am

Is it just me or is the Upper Low/TUTT over Florida tugging 99L to the north? https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/sat/sat ... uct=wv-mid
Last edited by BobHarlem on Thu Aug 26, 2021 8:03 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

Javlin
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1620
Age: 64
Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2004 7:58 pm
Location: ms gulf coast

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#366 Postby Javlin » Thu Aug 26, 2021 8:02 am

Kohlecane wrote:with that RGB and noted W movement I would say its closer to 17N(+/-) and 77.5W(+/-) just my view :roll:
EDIT: submit and see above post :lol: I was not that far off 8-)


Very close still thinking .5N and .3E just S of Jamaica
Last edited by Javlin on Thu Aug 26, 2021 8:07 am, edited 1 time in total.
1 likes   

User avatar
Kohlecane
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 593
Age: 33
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2011 11:03 pm
Location: Beaufort, SC

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#367 Postby Kohlecane » Thu Aug 26, 2021 8:03 am

Image
Really getting it's act together wouldn't be at all surprised we see a TS by the time it gets close to W Cuba
3 likes   
Once I see the REDS and GREENS Converge on a Base Velocity. ... I'm There!!

This is NOT an Official Forecast....Just my Opinion. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
HIGHLIGHTS : '13 El Reno Tornado : 2013 Storm Chaser Tour, Joaquin; SC flood event, Matthew '16, Lowcountry Snow storm Jan '18

Javlin
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1620
Age: 64
Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2004 7:58 pm
Location: ms gulf coast

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#368 Postby Javlin » Thu Aug 26, 2021 8:04 am

BobHarlem wrote:Is it just me or is the Upper Low/TUTT over Florida tugging 99L to the north?


Mentioned that yesterday in the Model thread it can't go through it but the TUTT has backed up since yesterday.
0 likes   

User avatar
Kohlecane
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 593
Age: 33
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2011 11:03 pm
Location: Beaufort, SC

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#369 Postby Kohlecane » Thu Aug 26, 2021 8:06 am

BobHarlem wrote:Is it just me or is the Upper Low/TUTT over Florida tugging 99L to the north? https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/sat/sat ... uct=wv-mid

Very interesting mention!
0 likes   
Once I see the REDS and GREENS Converge on a Base Velocity. ... I'm There!!

This is NOT an Official Forecast....Just my Opinion. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
HIGHLIGHTS : '13 El Reno Tornado : 2013 Storm Chaser Tour, Joaquin; SC flood event, Matthew '16, Lowcountry Snow storm Jan '18

User avatar
Jr0d
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1409
Joined: Tue Aug 27, 2019 10:52 am
Location: Cayo Hueso

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#370 Postby Jr0d » Thu Aug 26, 2021 8:17 am

BobHarlem wrote:Is it just me or is the Upper Low/TUTT over Florida tugging 99L to the north? https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/sat/sat ... uct=wv-mid


Sure looks like it. If I recall correctly, the ULL is forecast to move WSW enabling more north movement in the short term for soon to be Julian.
0 likes   

Red eye
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 34
Age: 47
Joined: Thu Oct 03, 2013 9:17 am
Location: Crowley,LA

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion - Central Caribbean

#371 Postby Red eye » Thu Aug 26, 2021 8:18 am

Jagno wrote:As a resident still living in a camper in my driveway I appreciate the positive but in fact we are so very far from ready and nwhere near being recovered. We've been thrilled to finally have a few more restaurants reopen but it's still far from normal. Myself, along with one of my daughter in laws spent hours searching and calling around for a nice RV park out of harms way only to find most were already booked. We finally found a nice campground but get this. You lose your money if the reservation is not cancelled within 8 days so they've got every single evacuee like me doling out several hundred dollars that you may or may not lose. State parks are still mostly closed with Covid restrictions. PTSD is very real and people are stressing big time.


I'm sorry Jagno. I know it's not easy. Keep on trucking man, it'll balance out.
2 likes   

Shell Mound
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2434
Age: 32
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2017 3:39 pm
Location: St. Petersburg, FL → Scandinavia

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#372 Postby Shell Mound » Thu Aug 26, 2021 8:20 am

Structurally this is still rather disorganised. While low-level turning is evident, 99L’s western hemisphere (half) is largely devoid of convection, owing to strong mid-level shear. Certainly, the mid-level circulation is well defined, and PWATs are high, but the TUTT (PVS) is clearly preventing consolidation as of now. The TUTT is weakening and retrograding, but doing so very slowly at this time. Also, while the past several runs of the GFS have adjusted themselves to account for 99L’s short-term organisation (and resultant, convectively induced ULAC), the runs have also trended toward a stronger PVS over peninsular FL and the Yucatán Channel. This effectively offsets 99L’s better-than-expected short-term, mid-level organisation and implies that 99L will likely not strengthen significantly prior to reaching western Cuba.
1 likes   
CVW / MiamiensisWx / Shell Mound
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the NHC and NWS.

User avatar
aspen
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8818
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 7:10 pm
Location: Connecticut, USA

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#373 Postby aspen » Thu Aug 26, 2021 8:22 am

Shell Mound wrote:Structurally this is still rather disorganised. While low-level turning is evident, 99L’s western hemisphere (half) is largely devoid of convection, owing to strong mid-level shear. Certainly, the mid-level circulation is well defined, and PWATs are high, but the TUTT (PVS) is clearly preventing consolidation as of now. The TUTT is weakening and retrograding, but doing so very slowly at this time. Also, while the past several runs of the GFS have adjusted themselves to account for 99L’s short-term organisation (and resultant, convectively induced ULAC), the runs have also trended toward a stronger PVS over peninsular FL and the Yucatán Channel. This effectively offsets 99L’s better-than-expected short-term, mid-level organisation and implies that 99L will likely not strengthen significantly prior to reaching western Cuba.

That bit of shear and dry air lurking to the west of 99L is probably why no model strengthens this much in the next 48 hours before crossing Cuba into the Gulf, but since they could be underestimating how far along it is, the storm could get a little stronger than forecast. Maybe a 55-60 kt TS at a Cuba landfall.
0 likes   
Irene '11 Sandy '12 Hermine '16 5/15/2018 Derecho Fay '20 Isaias '20 Elsa '21 Henri '21 Ida '21

I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.

User avatar
tropicwatch
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3383
Age: 61
Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2007 10:01 am
Location: Panama City Florida
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#374 Postby tropicwatch » Thu Aug 26, 2021 8:23 am

Jr0d wrote:
BobHarlem wrote:Is it just me or is the Upper Low/TUTT over Florida tugging 99L to the north? https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/sat/sat ... uct=wv-mid


Sure looks like it. If I recall correctly, the ULL is forecast to move WSW enabling more north movement in the short term for soon to be Julian.

Ida
0 likes   
Tropicwatch


Agnes 72', Eloise 75, Elena 85', Kate 85', Charley 86', Florence 88', Beryl 94', Dean 95', Erin 95', Opal 95', Earl 98', Georges 98', Ivan 2004', Arlene 2005', Dennis 2005', Ida 2009' Debby 2012' Irma 2017' Michael 2018'

User avatar
ConvergenceZone
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5194
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:40 am
Location: Northern California

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#375 Postby ConvergenceZone » Thu Aug 26, 2021 8:24 am

Shell Mound wrote:
GCANE wrote:Ouch!!
Right in the middle of a 355K PV Ring as it enters the GoM

https://i.postimg.cc/XJvScVMK/gfs-pv355-K-atl-9.png

Unless 99L is somehow sufficiently strong, the PVS just to its west would still induce westerly shear, thus limiting intensification over the Gulf. The PVS is attributable to downstream wave fluxes associated with TD Fourteen's convection over the EPAC near the west coast of Mexico. This PVS will play a major role in 99L's ultimate intensity. A stronger 99L prior to western Cuba would be better able to offset westerly shear from TD Fourteen.


True, but even if it ends up being just a Cat 1, it can still do quite a bit of damage, but yea I also noticed the landfall pressure doesn't seem near as low as it did with a few of the runs before, which is some good news anyway... Probably sensing more shear that you mentioned....
0 likes   

User avatar
ScottNAtlanta
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2367
Joined: Sat May 25, 2013 3:11 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#376 Postby ScottNAtlanta » Thu Aug 26, 2021 8:29 am

Shell Mound wrote:Structurally this is still rather disorganised. While low-level turning is evident, 99L’s western hemisphere (half) is largely devoid of convection, owing to strong mid-level shear. Certainly, the mid-level circulation is well defined, and PWATs are high, but the TUTT (PVS) is clearly preventing consolidation as of now. The TUTT is weakening and retrograding, but doing so very slowly at this time. Also, while the past several runs of the GFS have adjusted themselves to account for 99L’s short-term organisation (and resultant, convectively induced ULAC), the runs have also trended toward a stronger PVS over peninsular FL and the Yucatán Channel. This effectively offsets 99L’s better-than-expected short-term, mid-level organisation and implies that 99L will likely not strengthen significantly prior to reaching western Cuba.


There is little mid shear per Univ Wis. and it looks like it is right under an anticyclone. I see no degradation on the west side. This is right where the HWRF said it would be a couple of days ago. I even mentioned it then. Outflow is increasing SE and NW sides. This is probably a depression all ready if not a TS
2 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
MississippiWx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1699
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2010 1:44 pm
Location: Hattiesburg, Mississippi

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#377 Postby MississippiWx » Thu Aug 26, 2021 8:31 am

cycloneye wrote:12z Best Track:

99L INVEST 210826 1200 16.4N 79.0W ATL 30 1005


https://i.imgur.com/aXlJyFV.png


Fairly significant jump to the north in the best track.
0 likes   
This post is not an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of MississippiWx and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is not endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org. For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145298
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#378 Postby cycloneye » Thu Aug 26, 2021 8:31 am

ScottNAtlanta wrote:
Shell Mound wrote:Structurally this is still rather disorganised. While low-level turning is evident, 99L’s western hemisphere (half) is largely devoid of convection, owing to strong mid-level shear. Certainly, the mid-level circulation is well defined, and PWATs are high, but the TUTT (PVS) is clearly preventing consolidation as of now. The TUTT is weakening and retrograding, but doing so very slowly at this time. Also, while the past several runs of the GFS have adjusted themselves to account for 99L’s short-term organisation (and resultant, convectively induced ULAC), the runs have also trended toward a stronger PVS over peninsular FL and the Yucatán Channel. This effectively offsets 99L’s better-than-expected short-term, mid-level organisation and implies that 99L will likely not strengthen significantly prior to reaching western Cuba.


There is little mid shear per Univ Wis. and it looks like it is right under an anticyclone. I see no degradation on the west side. This is right where the HWRF said it would be a couple of days ago. I even mentioned it then. Outflow is increasing SE and NW sides. This is probably a depression all ready if not a TS


AF plane will find out what we have in the afternoon.
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
GCANE
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 11496
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 8:03 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#379 Postby GCANE » Thu Aug 26, 2021 8:32 am

ConvergenceZone wrote:
Shell Mound wrote:
GCANE wrote:Ouch!!
Right in the middle of a 355K PV Ring as it enters the GoM

https://i.postimg.cc/XJvScVMK/gfs-pv355-K-atl-9.png

Unless 99L is somehow sufficiently strong, the PVS just to its west would still induce westerly shear, thus limiting intensification over the Gulf. The PVS is attributable to downstream wave fluxes associated with TD Fourteen's convection over the EPAC near the west coast of Mexico. This PVS will play a major role in 99L's ultimate intensity. A stronger 99L prior to western Cuba would be better able to offset westerly shear from TD Fourteen.


True, but even if it ends up being just a Cat 1, it can still do quite a bit of damage, but yea I also noticed the landfall pressure doesn't seem near as low as it did with a few of the runs before, which is some good news anyway... Probably sensing more shear that you mentioned....


Strong convection can push out a PVS.
The point I was trying to make is that run-to-run, GFS is showing the PVS being further away from the CoC
3 likes   

Dean4Storms
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6358
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2003 1:01 pm
Location: Miramar Bch. FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#380 Postby Dean4Storms » Thu Aug 26, 2021 8:32 am

OK, think I see the low level rotation near 15.5N and 79W SW of the MLC. If you look at visible you can see some low level cumulus moving east to west just south of 16N in that clear area and that should not be if the LLC was further NNE near Jamaica. Guess the shear has the MLC displaced toward the NE.
Can't rule out development further up near the MLC but for now I do see some lower level spin down there.
Last edited by Dean4Storms on Thu Aug 26, 2021 8:35 am, edited 1 time in total.
1 likes   


Return to “2021”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests