

Moderator: S2k Moderators
aspen wrote:There's some support in the 12z CMC and ICON runs. Both get 91L into the BoC and also suggest the possibility of yet another WCar system next week. Looks like this'll be a hotspot throughout the rest of peak season.
tolakram wrote:aspen wrote:There's some support in the 12z CMC and ICON runs. Both get 91L into the BoC and also suggest the possibility of yet another WCar system next week. Looks like this'll be a hotspot throughout the rest of peak season.
Please be very careful making maps with names, you'll sometimes see these show up in other places. PLEASE DO NOT NAME STORMS until they are named.
aspen wrote:tolakram wrote:aspen wrote:There's some support in the 12z CMC and ICON runs. Both get 91L into the BoC and also suggest the possibility of yet another WCar system next week. Looks like this'll be a hotspot throughout the rest of peak season.
Please be very careful making maps with names, you'll sometimes see these show up in other places. PLEASE DO NOT NAME STORMS until they are named.
That’s why I refrained naming either of the disturbances in the ICON run, because it’s impossible to tell which one would be Mindy and which would be Nicholas. In the CMC scenario nothing else develops within 7 days except 91L, so it would be Mindy if that plays out. But I’ll refrain from naming disturbances in future posts.
Teban54 wrote:aspen wrote:tolakram wrote:
Please be very careful making maps with names, you'll sometimes see these show up in other places. PLEASE DO NOT NAME STORMS until they are named.
That’s why I refrained naming either of the disturbances in the ICON run, because it’s impossible to tell which one would be Mindy and which would be Nicholas. In the CMC scenario nothing else develops within 7 days except 91L, so it would be Mindy if that plays out. But I’ll refrain from naming disturbances in future posts.
I think his point is more that some users and guests may later repost these maps to other websites and social media, and folks without any knowledge of meteorology will treat them as indications of a storm (e.g. "Mindy" in this case) forming. I could be wrong though.
IcyTundra wrote:CMC and GFS take a long time to develop anything it kind of just meanders in the Bay of Campeche for several days before doing anything. GFS doesn't close off a low until it's right off the coast while the CMC does it much earlier and is able to develop into a strong TS or even maybe a weak cat 1 briefly. The ensembles still aren't showing much for 91L yet so I'm not too worried, but I'll still keep an eye on it.
HoustonFrog wrote:GFS 18z now stirring something up around the 8th/9th near Galveston like the CMC
Cpv17 wrote:IcyTundra wrote:CMC and GFS take a long time to develop anything it kind of just meanders in the Bay of Campeche for several days before doing anything. GFS doesn't close off a low until it's right off the coast while the CMC does it much earlier and is able to develop into a strong TS or even maybe a weak cat 1 briefly. The ensembles still aren't showing much for 91L yet so I'm not too worried, but I'll still keep an eye on it.
Give me a weak storm. I need some rain!
IcyTundra wrote:91L GFS ensemble members.
https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/storminfo/91L_gefs_latest.png
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests