jaguars_22 wrote:Cpv which means over Victoria?
With the current track, the NHC has it going just east of Victoria by maybe 20-30 miles.
Moderator: S2k Moderators
jaguars_22 wrote:Cpv which means over Victoria?
tolakram wrote:18Z GFS landfall
https://i.imgur.com/8lakiyr.png
MBryant wrote:Nederlander wrote:Whew, RIP Schulenberg, La Grange, Flatonia on that model run. But certainly only one run and definitely an outlier in terms of overall precipitation.
For reference, the highest total rainfall for Harvey was 60.58 inches at the airport in Jefferson county, south of Beaumont. I just don’t see that type of setup here with that many days of training bands.
That may be the highest official total, but I live about 10 miles from an unofficial 67" total (Vidor) which is about 25 miles north of the airport.
ChrisH-UK wrote:Has anyone noticed a trend in the models, each run has the center moving west and earlier than the last run. For example here's the GFS with Nicholas off Brownsville on the 06z nearest time is 21z and 18z nearest time is 15z and just off the coast.
https://i.imgur.com/RNwrnpD.png
https://i.imgur.com/2GkOu7N.png
Cpv17 wrote:ChrisH-UK wrote:Has anyone noticed a trend in the models, each run has the center moving west and earlier than the last run. For example here's the GFS with Nicholas off Brownsville on the 06z nearest time is 21z and 18z nearest time is 15z and just off the coast.
https://i.imgur.com/RNwrnpD.png
https://i.imgur.com/2GkOu7N.png
The GFS is caving to the Euro.
Clearcloudz wrote:Cpv17 wrote:ChrisH-UK wrote:Has anyone noticed a trend in the models, each run has the center moving west and earlier than the last run. For example here's the GFS with Nicholas off Brownsville on the 06z nearest time is 21z and 18z nearest time is 15z and just off the coast.
https://i.imgur.com/RNwrnpD.png
https://i.imgur.com/2GkOu7N.png
The GFS is caving to the Euro.
That would result in a epic rainfall event.
SoupBone wrote:Clearcloudz wrote:Cpv17 wrote:
The GFS is caving to the Euro.
That would result in a epic rainfall event.
I don't know how good the GFS is in rainfall predictions, but not really. It shows 9" over most of Houston for the whole event. That's actually manageable. The Euro was much more concerning.
Clearcloudz wrote:SoupBone wrote:Clearcloudz wrote:
That would result in a epic rainfall event.
I don't know how good the GFS is in rainfall predictions, but not really. It shows 9" over most of Houston for the whole event. That's actually manageable. The Euro was much more concerning.
If the track moves west then no system would slow down considerably and throw down rain way more than 9 inches probably in the 20 to 30 inch range.
Clearcloudz wrote:Cpv17 wrote:ChrisH-UK wrote:Has anyone noticed a trend in the models, each run has the center moving west and earlier than the last run. For example here's the GFS with Nicholas off Brownsville on the 06z nearest time is 21z and 18z nearest time is 15z and just off the coast.
https://i.imgur.com/RNwrnpD.png
https://i.imgur.com/2GkOu7N.png
The GFS is caving to the Euro.
That would result in a epic rainfall event.
SoupBone wrote:Clearcloudz wrote:SoupBone wrote:
I don't know how good the GFS is in rainfall predictions, but not really. It shows 9" over most of Houston for the whole event. That's actually manageable. The Euro was much more concerning.
If the track moves west then no system would slow down considerably and throw down rain way more than 9 inches probably in the 20 to 30 inch range.
Your response to him was referencing the GFS which shows the 9" amounts. The GFS does not show 20-30" of rain. That's why I mentioned the Euro, but even then most of the mets commenting said it's way overdoing those rainfall numbers. This next one might self-correct and maybe we'll see more realistic amounts.
The NWS Houston is calling for 8-10" in Houston with coastal areas and SE Houston getting between 15-20" which would not be fun.
Cpv17 wrote:The reason why the GFS is showing less rainfall is because it doesn’t stall it out like the Euro does.
Cpv17 wrote:The reason why the GFS is showing less rainfall is because it doesn’t stall it out like the Euro does.
SoupBone wrote:Cpv17 wrote:The reason why the GFS is showing less rainfall is because it doesn’t stall it out like the Euro does.
It's interesting how that's such a major difference in the two right now. The GFS zips it on out of here.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 36 guests