ATL: SAM - Remnants - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
grapealcoholic
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 684
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2021 3:26 pm

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#1981 Postby grapealcoholic » Fri Oct 01, 2021 10:50 am

Cooler waters taking a toll it seems
0 likes   

User avatar
cheezyWXguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6091
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 12:29 am
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#1982 Postby cheezyWXguy » Fri Oct 01, 2021 10:50 am

Owasso wrote:939.3 extrap.

What a baffling storm to track.

125kt FL, 125kt (flagged) SFMR as well. A little weaker than last night but not all that surprising since it took a minor hit from shear this morning. This has been a daily occurrence for the whole week though - a brief hit from shear in the early morning, followed by steady improvement through the day
Last edited by cheezyWXguy on Fri Oct 01, 2021 10:53 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
Hypercane_Kyle
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3344
Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2015 7:58 pm
Location: Cape Canaveral, FL

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#1983 Postby Hypercane_Kyle » Fri Oct 01, 2021 10:51 am

125 knot SFMR, but flagged. I'd put Sam at 120 knots now.

Something funky is going on with the recon though. Did a 180 in the eye, like an aborted NE eyewall intercept attempt.
Last edited by Hypercane_Kyle on Fri Oct 01, 2021 10:54 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   
My posts are my own personal opinion, defer to the National Hurricane Center (NHC) and other NOAA products for decision making during hurricane season.

grapealcoholic
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 684
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2021 3:26 pm

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#1984 Postby grapealcoholic » Fri Oct 01, 2021 10:54 am

Hypercane_Kyle wrote:125 knot SFMR, but flagged. I'd put Sam at 120 knots now.

It's a big storm so there's about a 10% undersampling of winds. Also still need to see the other quads
0 likes   

User avatar
kevin
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2554
Age: 26
Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2019 4:35 am

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#1985 Postby kevin » Fri Oct 01, 2021 10:54 am

152 kt FL winds in the NE quadrant!
4 likes   

User avatar
ElectricStorm
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5017
Age: 24
Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2019 11:23 pm
Location: Skiatook, OK / Norman, OK

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#1986 Postby ElectricStorm » Fri Oct 01, 2021 10:57 am

Are my eyes deceiving me or is that a 152 that just popped up :double:
0 likes   
I am in no way a professional. Take what I say with a grain of salt as I could be totally wrong. Please refer to the NHC, NWS, or SPC for official information.

Boomer Sooner!

User avatar
Iceresistance
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9279
Age: 21
Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2020 9:45 am
Location: Tecumseh, OK/Norman, OK

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#1987 Postby Iceresistance » Fri Oct 01, 2021 10:58 am

:eek:

Image

And the lowest Extrapolated Pressure is 937.8 MB
0 likes   
Bill 2015 & Beta 2020

Winter 2020-2021 :cold:

All observations are in Tecumseh, OK unless otherwise noted.

Winter posts are focused mainly for Oklahoma & Texas.

Take any of my forecasts with a grain of salt, refer to the NWS, SPC, and NHC for official information

Never say Never with weather! Because ANYTHING is possible!

grapealcoholic
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 684
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2021 3:26 pm

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#1988 Postby grapealcoholic » Fri Oct 01, 2021 10:58 am

Absolute beast of a storm :sun:
1 likes   

User avatar
kevin
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2554
Age: 26
Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2019 4:35 am

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#1989 Postby kevin » Fri Oct 01, 2021 10:59 am

Okay this might be a lot, a lot closer to a cat 5 than I thought. 152 kt supports an upgrade to 135 kt, but is just on the edge for a possible 140 kt upgrade especially since SFMR is relatively low. 155 - 156 kt FL winds would probably be sufficient. But considering that Sam is still improving and that we might get another 1 or 2 passes I think this now has a realistic chance to get a cat 5 peak.
0 likes   

User avatar
cheezyWXguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6091
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 12:29 am
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#1990 Postby cheezyWXguy » Fri Oct 01, 2021 10:59 am

kevin wrote:152 kt FL winds in the NE quadrant!

Looks like they missed the center too, xtrap dropped to 937.1 as the winds started coming back up
1 likes   

User avatar
aspen
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8812
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 7:10 pm
Location: Connecticut, USA

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#1991 Postby aspen » Fri Oct 01, 2021 11:00 am

An increase in pressure, but wow those FL winds. 135 kt seems like a good estimate now. It’s very strange how low SFMR is in the NE quad.
0 likes   
Irene '11 Sandy '12 Hermine '16 5/15/2018 Derecho Fay '20 Isaias '20 Elsa '21 Henri '21 Ida '21

I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.

User avatar
kevin
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2554
Age: 26
Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2019 4:35 am

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#1992 Postby kevin » Fri Oct 01, 2021 11:01 am

Eye temperature has also increased to 18.1C.
0 likes   

grapealcoholic
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 684
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2021 3:26 pm

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#1993 Postby grapealcoholic » Fri Oct 01, 2021 11:01 am

I would go with 140 to account for undersampling.
0 likes   

User avatar
kevin
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2554
Age: 26
Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2019 4:35 am

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#1994 Postby kevin » Fri Oct 01, 2021 11:03 am

I know it was only done in post-analysis, but note that they also went with 140 kt for Michael based on a 152 kt FL measurement.
0 likes   

Sciencerocks
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8903
Age: 39
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2017 1:51 am

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#1995 Postby Sciencerocks » Fri Oct 01, 2021 11:03 am

Image
6 likes   

User avatar
InfernoFlameCat
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2102
Age: 22
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2020 10:52 am
Location: Buford, GA

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#1996 Postby InfernoFlameCat » Fri Oct 01, 2021 11:05 am

Sam is. going for cat 5.
Lorenzo Style.
2 likes   
I am by no means a professional. DO NOT look at my forecasts for official information or make decisions based on what I post.

Goal: to become a registered expert over tropical and subtropical cyclones.

NotoSans
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1380
Age: 25
Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2015 1:15 am
Location: Toronto
Contact:

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#1997 Postby NotoSans » Fri Oct 01, 2021 11:06 am

Looks like what some posters have suspected is indeed correct. It is not uncommon for storms benefiting from trough interaction but with a weak southern eyewall to find it difficult to mix winds effectively to the surface. Zeta last year has flight-level winds that obviously supporting something above 100kt, but NHC at last goes only with 100kt, adopting a lower-than-usual conversion factor.

The best estimate is 125-130kt based on a blend of flight-level and SFMR data.
1 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to RSMC and NWS products.

User avatar
HurricaneEnzo
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 739
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2018 12:18 pm
Location: Newport, NC (Hurricane Alley)

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#1998 Postby HurricaneEnzo » Fri Oct 01, 2021 11:07 am

aspen wrote:An increase in pressure, but wow those FL winds. 135 kt seems like a good estimate now. It’s very strange how low SFMR is in the NE quad.


Not really. These higher latitude storms with warmer convection don't mix those winds in the upper levels of the system down to the surface as efficiently. Pretty common thing to see when we get recon on storms in this part of the world. Slightly stronger than I anticipated though 120-130kts would probably be good. I'm guessing they would probably go with a .8 conversion in this scenario.
Last edited by HurricaneEnzo on Fri Oct 01, 2021 11:13 am, edited 4 times in total.
1 likes   
Bertha 96' - Fran 96' - Bonnie 98' - Dennis 99' - Floyd 99' - Isabel 03' - Alex 04' - Ophelia 05' - Irene 11' - Arthur 14' - Matthew 16' - Florence 18' - Dorian 19' - Isaias 20' (countless other tropical storms and Hurricane swipes)

I am not a Professional Met just an enthusiast. Get your weather forecasts from the Pros!

NotoSans
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1380
Age: 25
Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2015 1:15 am
Location: Toronto
Contact:

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#1999 Postby NotoSans » Fri Oct 01, 2021 11:08 am

kevin wrote:I know it was only done in post-analysis, but note that they also went with 140 kt for Michael based on a 152 kt FL measurement.

Post-analysis finds SMFR (not flight-level) winds of 152kt for Michael, although the data is deemed somewhat inflated. Also, recon data shows the standard 0.9 conversion factor does apply to Michael, but not necessarily the case for Sam.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to RSMC and NWS products.

User avatar
kevin
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2554
Age: 26
Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2019 4:35 am

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#2000 Postby kevin » Fri Oct 01, 2021 11:08 am

One thing that might be in Sam's favor for a possible cat 5 upgrade is that it has a fantastic wind field. The 152 kt FL wind isn't a weird outlier surrounded by 110 kt or something like that, but the windfield very gradually slopes down as recon leaves Sam's center: 144-152-145-137-135-132-126-121.
Last edited by kevin on Fri Oct 01, 2021 11:09 am, edited 1 time in total.
4 likes   


Return to “2021”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 32 guests