Yellow Evan wrote:
https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/733552978572869632/901641187599999016/image0.png?width=406&height=406
Much better here.
Yes, the 00:47z pass shows marked improvement.

Moderator: S2k Moderators
Yellow Evan wrote:
https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/733552978572869632/901641187599999016/image0.png?width=406&height=406
Much better here.
Ubuntwo wrote:Yellow Evan wrote:
https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/733552978572869632/901641187599999016/image0.png?width=406&height=406
Much better here.
Yes, the 00:47z pass shows marked improvement.
https://i.imgur.com/TlyQulm.png
NXStumpy_Robothing wrote:Yellow Evan wrote:17E RICK 211024 0000 15.1N 101.9W EPAC 75 978
Not sure what justifies this.
It looks like they're holding steady from the previous recon flight's data, as there hasn't been an incredibly notable improvement (or much of a change while the thing fights a tongue of dry air) in convective appearance/structure. I wouldn't be surprised to see this value being an underestimate, though.
Next recon is up and out from Biloxi.
Yellow Evan wrote:Except Dvorak estimates from TAFB have reached T5.0 when it was previously T4.5 and there’s definitely been inner core improvement. And I didn’t like how the NHC blended flight level winds with SFMR at the 21z advisory either.
Yellow Evan wrote:https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/733552978572869632/901665527062204436/20211023.png
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/733552978572869632/901665532611293224/20211024.png
Both of these are 75 knots apparently.
Also SATCON is being held down by AMSU which hasn’t updated in a couple days so not sure why weight is being given towards that.
MarioProtVI wrote:If Rick fails to intensify much further then the NHC needs to do some serious investigation into their modelling and intensity forecasting post-season because that would be two massive busts in a row after the intensity disaster that was Pamela in terms of intensity and investigation into what models missed in the atmosphere that kept the actual intensity far below what was modeled.
zzh wrote:From NHC's discussion:Since Rick is in a low shear environment and has excellent cirrus
outflow, it is unclear why the system has stopped intensifying.
MarioProtVI wrote:If Rick fails to intensify much further then the NHC needs to do some serious investigation into their modelling and intensity forecasting post-season because that would be two massive busts in a row after the intensity disaster that was Pamela in terms of intensity and investigation into what models missed in the atmosphere that kept the actual intensity far below what was modeled.
Yellow Evan wrote:No eye and VDM comes with rising pressure. This is going absolutely nowhere.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests