orangeblood wrote:txtwister78 wrote:Responsible and a good graphic overall to understand, I think by FWD. The only thing I would change would be the "nuisance impacts" category. I would just combine that with the other category (some impacts) just for messaging purposes.
But where is this data coming from ? Some proprietary model we don’t know about ? Anyone have access to it ?
No idea, but if I were to guess I would say they're taking into account a variety of factors other than just looking at every incoming model output 4-5 days out (which still shows some minor variability). Some of these folks I would imagine are looking at analogs and also considering the drought/pattern we've been stuck under for months and as I mentioned earlier, they're never going to yell "fire" 4-5 days out with winter precip/cold outbreaks down here. I get everything right now points to a strong signal of a significant winter precip event in N & W TX and it's a fine line to push the "red alert" button when you know the effect that's going to have on the general public (panic shopping, increased anxiety for some due to last year etc). Not saying that's a reason not to do it btw...but no doubt they're probably considering that.
Having said that, I've always taken the approach with weather (particularly severe weather) that when it comes to life and property, there is no such thing as over preparedness, however I'm not sitting behind that decision desk where what I do can impact millions either way. That's a big responsibility to have. Models as we've seen before can change dramatically 4-5 days out and while it doesn't appear that will occur here (extreme changes due to good model agreement), I'm reluctant to critique those decision makers because I don't have the information they're using or the experience quite frankly that they do. I just feel the best you can do is get the word out to family/friends and self-prepare.