

Moderator: S2k Moderators
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.



Ntxw wrote:Let's do a little bit of verification with the Euro. I took 12z run from Saturday and max high pressure up in northwest Canada the model depicted 1043mb forecast for this morning 12z. Analysis from WPC real time sits at 1050hp. This is roughly a 3 day forecast that shouldn't be that hard. That is a drastic difference. There is something wrong with it and these recent upgrades the past few years has made it struggle with Arctic blasts in these parts.
https://i.imgur.com/8LSH4MS.png
https://i.imgur.com/EKWU1LF.gif




Ntxw wrote:Let's do a little bit of verification with the Euro. I took 12z run from Saturday and max high pressure up in northwest Canada the model depicted 1043mb forecast for this morning 12z. Analysis from WPC real time sits at 1050hp. This is roughly a 3 day forecast that shouldn't be that hard. That is a drastic difference. There is something wrong with it and these recent upgrades the past few years has made it struggle with Arctic blasts in these parts.
https://i.imgur.com/8LSH4MS.png
https://i.imgur.com/EKWU1LF.gif

Portastorm wrote:It's not publicly accessible but the Tech WRF model is followed by (at least) some NWS offices. I just checked out the latest run (6z) and the freezing line at the surface it shows for Thursday. Seems it's fairly aggressive as compared to the other models. By 5-6 am Thursday, the freezing line runs from near Texarkana down to San Antonio and west to Del Rio. Interesting.

TropicalTundra wrote:Love how the WRF-ARW's are polar opposite twins. WRF-ARW gives me probably a dusting, and WRF-ARW2 gives 6+ inches of snow or more for me and the Metroplex folks. Hi-Res models are still in disagreement on how fast the warm nose deteriorates. With heavy rain, freezing rain and sleet falling it won't take long for it to erode, which the models are still trying to see better.
rwfromkansas wrote:Ntxw wrote:Let's do a little bit of verification with the Euro. I took 12z run from Saturday and max high pressure up in northwest Canada the model depicted 1043mb forecast for this morning 12z. Analysis from WPC real time sits at 1050hp. This is roughly a 3 day forecast that shouldn't be that hard. That is a drastic difference. There is something wrong with it and these recent upgrades the past few years has made it struggle with Arctic blasts in these parts.
https://i.imgur.com/8LSH4MS.png
https://i.imgur.com/EKWU1LF.gif
Trying to learn how to read these maps better. The surface analysis seems to show the high further north than the model, which might be bad news, or is it really? It is more powerful as well. The low is slightly stronger in Canada north of MN, and the cold is definitely funneling down well up north.

Brent wrote:Iceresistance wrote:I don't know what to say on NWS-Tulsa. (I'm sure that Brent is going to be very surprised seeing this)
https://s10.gifyu.com/images/SNOW24HRTHREAT20220202_1200.png
https://s10.gifyu.com/images/SNOW24HRTHREAT20220202_1200.png
What the heck I just saw that an hour ago and it had 5-6







Brent wrote:Brent wrote:Iceresistance wrote:I don't know what to say on NWS-Tulsa. (I'm sure that Brent is going to be very surprised seeing this)
https://s10.gifyu.com/images/SNOW24HRTHREAT20220202_1200.png
https://s10.gifyu.com/images/SNOW24HRTHREAT20220202_1200.png
What the heck I just saw that an hour ago and it had 5-6
Lol its back to 5-6 now. Guess it was an "error"
I do see higher potential but I dunno about 15

Ralph's Weather wrote:Brent wrote:Brent wrote:
What the heck I just saw that an hour ago and it had 5-6
Lol its back to 5-6 now. Guess it was an "error"
I do see higher potential but I dunno about 15
Looks like someone hit submit on an internal graphic haha.

CaptinCrunch wrote:If you really want to know where the surface cold is start plotting the airports and WSO. Models will show you where the front is, but we know the artic air at the surface will be out ahead of the main front.
Once the surface hits freezing the frz rain will start accumulating on elevated surfaces, trees, power lines and so on.

Portastorm wrote:It's not publicly accessible but the Tech WRF model is followed by (at least) some NWS offices. I just checked out the latest run (6z) and the freezing line at the surface it shows for Thursday. Seems it's fairly aggressive as compared to the other models. By 5-6 am Thursday, the freezing line runs from near Texarkana down to San Antonio and west to Del Rio. Interesting.



wxman57 wrote:Not much change in the precip areas with the 12Z GFS. Looks like you "northerners" are going to get some winter weather. I don't know if this GFS run will verify, but I think it's safe to say that you'll be parking your cars Wednesday afternoon and not driving again until next week. Better get all your supplies now. I have a full bag of Chips Ahoy cookies and my electric blanket. That's all I'll need.
http://wxman57.com/images/TXRN3.png
http://wxman57.com/images/TXZR3.png
http://wxman57.com/images/TXIP3.png
http://wxman57.com/images/TXSN3.png

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 41 guests