zzh wrote:https://i.imgur.com/PtvAIL9.png
EPAC is anomalously active right now despite unfavorable environment. Not a good sign for the Atlantic.
It's 11 July + west of 120W is very much not that unfavorable


Moderator: S2k Moderators
zzh wrote:https://i.imgur.com/PtvAIL9.png
EPAC is anomalously active right now despite unfavorable environment. Not a good sign for the Atlantic.
cycloneye wrote:zzh wrote:https://i.imgur.com/PtvAIL9.png
EPAC is anomalously active right now despite unfavorable environment. Not a good sign for the Atlantic.
What do you mean about "not a good sign for the Atlantic"?
zzh wrote:cycloneye wrote:zzh wrote:https://i.imgur.com/PtvAIL9.png
EPAC is anomalously active right now despite unfavorable environment. Not a good sign for the Atlantic.
What do you mean about "not a good sign for the Atlantic"?
An active EPAC usually means a quiet Atlantic.
weeniepatrol wrote:zzh wrote:https://i.imgur.com/PtvAIL9.png
EPAC is anomalously active right now despite unfavorable environment. Not a good sign for the Atlantic.
It's 11 July + west of 120W is very much not that unfavorable
https://i.imgur.com/CsVDqQf.png
https://i.imgur.com/rVDAsxN.gif
weeniepatrol wrote:The epac famously began and ended well above climo in 2018, shutting down the Atlantic. There were hardly any depressions that year, let alone above-average ACE!
cycloneye wrote:weeniepatrol wrote:The epac famously began and ended well above climo in 2018, shutting down the Atlantic. There were hardly any depressions that year, let alone above-average ACE!
Well, then came Michael.
zzh wrote:cycloneye wrote:zzh wrote:https://i.imgur.com/PtvAIL9.png
EPAC is anomalously active right now despite unfavorable environment. Not a good sign for the Atlantic.
What do you mean about "not a good sign for the Atlantic"?
An active EPAC usually means a quiet Atlantic.
cycloneye wrote:zzh wrote:cycloneye wrote:
What do you mean about "not a good sign for the Atlantic"?
An active EPAC usually means a quiet Atlantic.
You really believe the Atlantic will be below average? Wait from August 15th and beyond.
zzh wrote:cycloneye wrote:zzh wrote:An active EPAC usually means a quiet Atlantic.
You really believe the Atlantic will be below average?
Not saying that. We will see if the EPAC shuts down after these storms. If it does, the doors are still open for the Atlantic. If it doesn't, then I think the ceiling is set.
zzh wrote:cycloneye wrote:zzh wrote:An active EPAC usually means a quiet Atlantic.
You really believe the Atlantic will be below average? Wait from August 15th and beyond.
Not saying that. We will see if the EPAC shuts down after these storms. If it does, the doors are still open for the Atlantic. If it doesn't, then I think the ceiling is set.
Category5Kaiju wrote:Lol, if you think the EPAC is busy while the Atlantic is quiet, just look at the WPAC. Atlantic shouldn’t feel ashamed one bit lol
zzh wrote:Category5Kaiju wrote:Lol, if you think the EPAC is busy while the Atlantic is quiet, just look at the WPAC. Atlantic shouldn’t feel ashamed one bit lol
All I said was "An active EPAC season usually means a quiet Atlantic season". Can you tell me what's wrong with that? Also, I did not say "The Atlantic is quiet now means it will be quiet in peak season".
Category5Kaiju wrote:zzh wrote:Category5Kaiju wrote:Lol, if you think the EPAC is busy while the Atlantic is quiet, just look at the WPAC. Atlantic shouldn’t feel ashamed one bit lol
All I said was "An active EPAC season usually means a quiet Atlantic season". Can you tell me what's wrong with that? Also, I did not say "The Atlantic is quiet now means it will be quiet in peak season".
Oh, I wasn't pointing out or criticizing what you said. Sorry about the confusion and if it seemed like that was the case; that wasn't my intention at all. There's nothing wrong with what you said and I totally agree with your sentiment. I was simply pointing out that it's sort of interesting to see how the EPAC is even beating the WPAC in NSs and ACE thus far.
zzh wrote:Category5Kaiju wrote:Lol, if you think the EPAC is busy while the Atlantic is quiet, just look at the WPAC. Atlantic shouldn’t feel ashamed one bit lol
All I said was "An active EPAC season usually means a quiet Atlantic season". Can you tell me what's wrong with that? Also, I did not say "The Atlantic is quiet now means it will be quiet in peak season".
USTropics wrote:zzh wrote:Category5Kaiju wrote:Lol, if you think the EPAC is busy while the Atlantic is quiet, just look at the WPAC. Atlantic shouldn’t feel ashamed one bit lol
All I said was "An active EPAC season usually means a quiet Atlantic season". Can you tell me what's wrong with that? Also, I did not say "The Atlantic is quiet now means it will be quiet in peak season".
You're 100% correct, typically EPAC seasons that feature higher percentile ACE years (+180 ACE) correlate to lower ACE values in the Atlantic:
https://i.imgur.com/wn9aEPY.png
However, there is more of a correlation between high ACE values in both the EPAC + WPAC comparative to the Atlantic:
https://i.imgur.com/BQSfLwg.png
We're not currently seeing that type of activity in the WPAC, and while the EPAC ACE is high for mid-July (~40 compared to 22 for 1991-2020 climo period), storm count is at the climatological mean (5th storm typically forms July 15th in the EPAC). As you stated, EPAC would have to continue to churn ACE to the tune of 180+ (so 140 more ACE) to start to see the correlation between lower ACE values in the Atlantic. Typically we would also see some type of driving force to substantiate this (such as ENSO state). You can see this has the highest correlation below with ONI plot for ASO of each year:
https://imgur.com/qQYuGIv.png
Given the relative higher latitude position of the ITCZ compared to previous seasons, once the background state in the Atlantic turns more favorable, these waves (or storms in the case of Bonnie) that are continuously crossing over Central America and into the EPAC to act as seeds will begin to lift more north into the Caribbean or North Atlantic.
I published these as interactive charts if you want to see specific values:
EPAC + ATL ACE: - https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/ ... nteractive
EPAC + ATL + WPAC ACE - https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/ ... nteractive
EPAC + ATL ACE + ONI (ASO) - https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/ ... nteractive
Category5Kaiju wrote:USTropics wrote:zzh wrote:All I said was "An active EPAC season usually means a quiet Atlantic season". Can you tell me what's wrong with that? Also, I did not say "The Atlantic is quiet now means it will be quiet in peak season".
You're 100% correct, typically EPAC seasons that feature higher percentile ACE years (+180 ACE) correlate to lower ACE values in the Atlantic:
https://i.imgur.com/wn9aEPY.png
However, there is more of a correlation between high ACE values in both the EPAC + WPAC comparative to the Atlantic:
https://i.imgur.com/BQSfLwg.png
We're not currently seeing that type of activity in the WPAC, and while the EPAC ACE is high for mid-July (~40 compared to 22 for 1991-2020 climo period), storm count is at the climatological mean (5th storm typically forms July 15th in the EPAC). As you stated, EPAC would have to continue to churn ACE to the tune of 180+ (so 140 more ACE) to start to see the correlation between lower ACE values in the Atlantic. Typically we would also see some type of driving force to substantiate this (such as ENSO state). You can see this has the highest correlation below with ONI plot for ASO of each year:
https://imgur.com/qQYuGIv.png
Given the relative higher latitude position of the ITCZ compared to previous seasons, once the background state in the Atlantic turns more favorable, these waves (or storms in the case of Bonnie) that are continuously crossing over Central America and into the EPAC to act as seeds will begin to lift more north into the Caribbean or North Atlantic.
I published these as interactive charts if you want to see specific values:
EPAC + ATL ACE: - https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/ ... nteractive
EPAC + ATL + WPAC ACE - https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/ ... nteractive
EPAC + ATL ACE + ONI (ASO) - https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/ ... nteractive
Very good analysis there USTropics! Yeah, what I find particularly odd here is how the EPAC remains active but the WPAC is very quiet. In fact, it's looking very likely that we'll see 6 total NSs in the EPAC soon while the WPAC remains quiet with no strong model backing for any major system there anytime soon. Even in unusually active years like 2011, the WPAC had considerable amounts of activity that had happened and were happening as the EPAC was churning up storms in the June/July months. At least this year, there definitely seems to be a disconnect between EPAC and WPAC activity.
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot], RomP and 160 guests