#5976 Postby typhoonty » Fri Sep 30, 2022 12:36 pm
wxman57 wrote:MetsIslesNoles wrote:Listening to FEMA / Governor's press conference in Lee county right now, and I have to agree with the posters that have said we need something different than the cone in the future. Both FEMA and the Governor were quick to talk about Lee county not even being in the cone 72 hours before landfall. First, Lee was on the border of the cone 72 hours before. Second, it's obvious even the officials can't message the point that the cone is just for the center of the storm. Maybe we should go back to a 3 day cone plus a potential impact map? I wish I had answers. The NHC did a good job with a very tough forecast, but there needs to be a change in messaging.
Agree that the cone is absolutely meaningless as far as indicating a threat or possible impacts. The general accuracy of forecasts over the past 5 seasons (current cone) likely bears no resemblance to current uncertainty or possible impacts. In this case, the cone did not include Lee County because landfall uncertainty here was higher than the 5 season average. Cone never changes, though. It's always the same for every advisory with every storm, all season long.
What's needed is a probabilistic cone based on current storm wind field size and ensemble data. Trouble with that is the ensemble data for 8am EDT, for example, isn't all available until around 5pm EDT. Takes too long to get the ensemble data from the European run after the deterministic run is in. Forecasts were good. Hurricane into the coast near Ft. Myers from 24 hours out. Just minor heading changes were the difference between Tampa and Ft. Myers, same as with Charley.
Forecasts would have been shifted southward to Ft. Myers more quickly if the GFS had not been pulling the consensus model well northward across the peninsula. We ignored the GFS and compensated by adjusting the track farther south than the NHC. In the heat of battle, so to speak, it's hard to identify what model to trust. I knew that the GFS would be too slow and too far west, as it always is with a westerly sheared storm in the Gulf. But how much farther east/south would it track? That's the hard part.
There were 3 days of consecutive shifts southeast. No one took it seriously, 90% of people who were supposed to evacuate stayed. The cone should include Hurricane wind radii to the edge at least. Too many people think not in cone = no danger. We were both on the same page Sunday and Monday that it would settle further south than the center of the cone.
When I do analysis, the number one thing I do is go to tropical tidbits, look at 500 mb chart, and see if there is ANY deviation in ANY direction with troughs and ridges between the analysis and previous T+6 using the trend feature. I noticed during Irma the ridge was constantly being forecast too weak at T+6 vs analysis 5 days before and warned my folks to evacuate because the threat was higher to southwest Florida than was portrayed.
During Ian, I did the same thing and noticed the trough being under amplified since Sunday. That, combined with it's lack of organization on Sunday allowed it to gain just enough latitude to produce this catastrophic result.
4 likes
FSU Meteorology student, opinions are mine, 20 years experience covering TC's, consult NHC/Local officials when making decisions.
Gabrielle '01, Michelle '01, Charley '04, Frances '04, Dennis '05, Katrina '05, Rita '05, Wilma '05, Fay '08, Isaac '12 Hermine '16, Irma '17, Michael '18, Eta '20, Elsa '21, IAN '22, Idalia '23, Debby '24, Helene '24