zzzh wrote:ERC is far from over per the microwave. Another case of IR deception.
Proof? ERC was clearly done by the time radar went out - see my loop.
https://twitter.com/yellow_evan/status/1661208893622747136
Moderator: S2k Moderators
zzzh wrote:ERC is far from over per the microwave. Another case of IR deception.
canebeard wrote:Kingarabian wrote:ScottNAtlanta wrote:The eye has really cleared out and become symmetric the last couple of frames on satellite. It seems this storm did that little island dance where it scoots around the north side of the island like you see sometimes with Hispaniola in the Atlantic.
Possible but Guam is not as mountainous. But a great point as models don't seem to model this out properly. We do see this in Hawaii as well similar to Hispaniola.
I doubt Guam or Hawaii affects the path; more likely just fortuitous wobbles and/or erc at just the right time, changing the geometric center point temporarily. Guam has had direct hits on several occasions. Hispanolia is another story. When we went to Puerto Rico to chase Hugo in 1989, many of the locals in San Juan claimed the Yunque region east of them protected them from direct hits. Recent history has disproved that one.
zzzh wrote::uarrow: That was 16h ago![]()
https://i.imgur.com/P2mqLhE.jpg
Concentric eyewalls in 3 quadrants with rainband in the north. This is clearly still in ERC.
zzzh wrote::uarrow: That was 16h ago![]()
https://i.imgur.com/P2mqLhE.jpg
Concentric eyewalls in 3 quadrants with rainband in the north. This is clearly still in ERC.
Hawaii ESPECIALLY the Big Island absolutely affects a TC track. Flow can not go up a mountain barrier at a certain point and must deflect around it (orographic blocking) and most of the Hawaiian Islands have peaks >4000 ft in elevation. We’ve seen multiple systems deflect around the Big Island to where landfall is avoided altogether (Douglas 2020, Flossie 2013, Madeline 2016), often by significant margins.
Hayabusa wrote:SMAP fix from 4 hours ago 124.7 knotsWP, 02, 202305242043, 30, SMAP, IR, , 1410N, 14410E, , 1, 116, 1, , , , 34, NEQ, 0, 0, 0, 103, , , , , 1, 0, , W, NASA, RSS, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , 1, max. wind is 10 minute sustained
WP, 02, 202305242043, 30, SMAP, IR, , 1410N, 14410E, , 1, 116, 1, , , , 50, NEQ, 0, 0, 0, 61, , , , , 1, 0, , W, NASA, RSS, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , 1, max. wind is 10 minute sustained
WP, 02, 202305242043, 30, SMAP, IR, , 1410N, 14410E, , 1, 116, 1, , , , 64, NEQ, 0, 0, 0, 50, , , , , 1, 0, , W, NASA, RSS, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , 1, max. wind is 10 minute sustained
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests