British Human Shields leave...

Chat about anything and everything... (well almost anything) Whether it be the front porch or the pot belly stove or news of interest or a topic of your liking, this is the place to post it.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
mf_dolphin
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 17758
Age: 68
Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2002 2:05 pm
Location: St Petersburg, FL
Contact:

British Human Shields leave...

#1 Postby mf_dolphin » Mon Mar 03, 2003 10:52 am

LONDON, England (CNN) -- Most of the British human shields who traveled to Baghdad in red double-decker buses are returning home before a gunshot has been fired because of "safety fears," organisers say.

Many of those returning are concerned for their safety after the Iraqi authorities began dictating which sites they could "protect," said Christiaan Briggs, a co-ordinator for the action group in Baghdad.

Briggs told the UK's news agency Press Association: "Now we are being told we cannot go to certain sites, such as hospitals, so we are reassessing our strategy.

"I must stress the people on the bus were always intending on going back. The aim was always a mass migration and if we had had five to ten thousand people here there would never be a war.

"We do not have those numbers and a lot of people were always intending to go back before the bombing campaign started."

The two buses, which left Baghdad Saturday, are thought to be heading towards Syria.

Abdul al-Hashimi, head of Saddam Hussein's Peace and Solidarity Organization, ordered the volunteers to disperse to nine sites in Baghdad or leave, Britain's broadsheet newspaper, Daily Telegraph reported. Most of the activists thought they would be "shielding" schools or hospitals, but instead found themselves assigned to power stations, oil refineries and water purification plants.

"We had been told we would go to humanitarian sites, specifically hospitals," Ken O'Keefe, the former U.S. marine who led the activists, told the newspaper. "But we've now been told that we can't go to those places. The human shields strategy will not work under these circumstances. The level of trust is not present now."

Nine of the 11 British human shields in the bus convoy had left Baghdad, the Telegraph said. Among them was 68-year-old Godfrey Meynell, a former High Sheriff of Derbyshire, who was assigned to protect Baghdad South power station but admitted that he was leaving out of "cold fear."

A 22-year-old student from Pennsylvania assigned to an oil refinery told the paper: "The people staying there sleep 50 yards from stacks billowing black smoke.

"And it's sinister: twenty minders are there for eight shields. There are three security gates, including one manned by plain-clothed guards carrying AK47s."

U.S. officials have said that it is a "war crime" to use civilians as human shields and that there is no way of guaranteeing their safety.

Briggs estimated around a dozen remained in Baghdad and said he and others may now act as witnesses rather than human shields.

"I said right from the start, I was prepared to die but when I knew I had a chance of affecting change," he said.

Grueling journey
The original bus protesters were the first British human shields to arrive in Baghdad, on February 16, after a grueling 3,000 mile journey from London.

They encountered many problems on their way, including O'Keefe who at one point was forced to stay behind in Rome to fix a broken-down bus before having to fly on later to Damascus.

Other setbacks included punctures, running out of petrol, route alterations -- and according to British media reports -- squabbles between different activist factions.

On Friday, the head of Sweden's largest peace organization urged human shields to leave Iraq, saying they were being used for propaganda purposes by Iraqi President Saddam Hussein.

Maria Ermanno, chairwoman of the Swedish Peace and Arbitration Society, cited reports that Iraqi officials were arranging transportation, accommodation and news conferences for the human shields.

"To go down to Iraq and live and act there on the regime's expense, then you're supporting a terrible dictator. I think that method is entirely wrong," Ermanno told Swedish Radio.




It's about time they got some common sense!
0 likes   

User avatar
coriolis
Retired Staff
Retired Staff
Posts: 8314
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 10:58 pm
Location: Muncy, PA

#2 Postby coriolis » Mon Mar 03, 2003 10:55 am

Quote: "...squabbles between activist factions..."
Imagine that.
0 likes   
This space for rent.

User avatar
isobar
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2002
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 9:05 am
Location: Louisville, KY

#3 Postby isobar » Mon Mar 03, 2003 11:11 am

Did they actually think Iraqi officials cared more for their schools and hospitals than the oil refineries and power plants? Hellooooooo?
0 likes   

Rainband

#4 Postby Rainband » Mon Mar 03, 2003 11:11 am

They weren't allowed near hospitals???? Maybe thats where they should be looking for the chemical weapons Saddam doesn't have :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:



Johnathan :D
0 likes   

User avatar
streetsoldier
Retired Staff
Retired Staff
Posts: 9705
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 11:33 pm
Location: Under the rainbow

#5 Postby streetsoldier » Mon Mar 03, 2003 11:30 am

Nah, they jnust got tired of the food; one can only stomach so much mutton and "Allahui Akbars", then it's time to pay tribute to the Porcelain Throne of Saddam Hussein..."We're not worthy! We're not worthy!" :roll:

Oh well, "inshallah" (God wills it"), as our intrepid eejits book out as fast as they can for greener shores. :wink:
0 likes   


Return to “Off Topic”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests