ATL: IDALIA - Post-Tropical - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
Michele B
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1114
Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2016 8:08 am
Location: SWFL

Re: ATL: IDALIA - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#1181 Postby Michele B » Mon Aug 28, 2023 6:16 am

caneman wrote:
d3v123 wrote:Waking up to everyone, professionals included, in Bradenton and St. Pete practically sounding the all clear alarm. Been a little disappointing to see the complete lack of concern around here


I live in Largo - Indian rocks. I've not heard that at all. We are in the cone and some areas facing up to an 11 ft. Storm surge. Prepare for up to Cat 3. Winds



When you’re within a couple hundred miles of a potential hurricane landfall, I would definitely NOT let your guard Dow down.

They told us here in SW FL that Ian was going to Tampa. After having gone through Charlie, I *knew* not to totally trust everything without using my own instincts.
7 likes   
Cleo - 1964, Betsy - 1965, David - 1979, Andrew - 1992, Charlie (Francis, Ivan, Jeanne) - 2004, Irma - 2017, Ian - 2022

NAVAIDNICK
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 26
Age: 46
Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2021 4:48 pm
Location: North Port, FL

Re: ATL: IDALIA - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#1182 Postby NAVAIDNICK » Mon Aug 28, 2023 6:17 am

Jr0d wrote:I really hope my location bias and fatigue is not clouding my judgement, but I see this making landfall further south towards Sarasota.

A landfall south of Tampa Bay would be much better in terms of economic damage and casualties as it would limit or even prevent surge by blowing the water out the bay.

Obviously this is bad for those in Sarasota, Englewood , ect.., but in terms of potential poss of life it is a better scenario.



As someone who lives in Sarasota, I adamantly disagree that a southern/eastern landfall is a "better scenario", especially since there are a lot of people down here still recovering from Ian. I have neighbors with tarps on their roofs still and It's only been a couple of months since my house got repaired. I get that you think that because of it being less densely populated but the last thing that our communities need is to have to recover all over again. Heck, there are places down here that never recovered from Irma, so we don't need another "I" storm to undo all the progress we've made.
4 likes   

TallyTracker
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 734
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 2:46 pm

Re: ATL: IDALIA - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#1183 Postby TallyTracker » Mon Aug 28, 2023 6:19 am

Clearcloudz wrote:11 feet storm surge in parts of Tampa Bay. :eek: Are officials in Tampa waiting for 11 AM advisory for evacuations cause they are cutting it close when it comes giving enough time to educate the people of what might happen.

https://i.imgur.com/ARtyJpp.jpg


They need to get those evacuations going now. Even Idalia passing on the current center of the track will flood the lower parts of the Tampa Bay Area. And Tampa is still in the cone only 36 hours out. That’s more than enough justification to start mandatory evacuations of the lower surge zones.
5 likes   
Fran '96, Georges '98, Gordon '00, Gabrielle '01, Charley '04, Frances '04, Jeanne '04, Barry '07, Fay '08, Debby '12, Matthew '16, Emily '17, Irma '17, Michael ‘18, Elsa ‘21, Fred ‘21, Mindy ‘21, Nicole ‘22, Idalia ‘23, Debby ‘24, Helene ‘24

User avatar
Hypercane_Kyle
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3354
Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2015 7:58 pm
Location: Cape Canaveral, FL

Re: ATL: IDALIA - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#1184 Postby Hypercane_Kyle » Mon Aug 28, 2023 6:20 am

Definitely getting better confidence in the track forecast, with a 100-110 knot system making landfall in Cedar Key on Wednesday morning. That being said, I could definitely see more shifts south and east along the Florida coastline, perhaps even as far south as Hernando county. This could be a major storm surge event for the Tampa Bay area.
6 likes   
My posts are my own personal opinion, defer to the National Hurricane Center (NHC) and other NOAA products for decision making during hurricane season.

User avatar
GCANE
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 11500
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 8:03 am

Re: ATL: IDALIA - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#1185 Postby GCANE » Mon Aug 28, 2023 6:22 am

Looking at CAPE distribution in the GOM, I am estimating RI will occur when Idalia gets to about 25N
4 likes   

User avatar
NDG
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 15446
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 10:14 pm
Location: Orlando, FL

Re: ATL: IDALIA - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#1186 Postby NDG » Mon Aug 28, 2023 6:25 am

Good morning after 5 hrs of good sleep.

I see Idalia started on its track north this morning as expected as Franklin started moving north last night.

Image
4 likes   

User avatar
aspen
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8818
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 7:10 pm
Location: Connecticut, USA

Re: ATL: IDALIA - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#1187 Postby aspen » Mon Aug 28, 2023 6:28 am

Low 990s with 55 kt SFMR. The NHC was just about spot-on with their 988/55 intensity estimate for 5am.
3 likes   
Irene '11 Sandy '12 Hermine '16 5/15/2018 Derecho Fay '20 Isaias '20 Elsa '21 Henri '21 Ida '21

I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.

User avatar
Clearcloudz
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 540
Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2018 1:46 pm
Location: Rosenberg TX

Re: ATL: IDALIA - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#1188 Postby Clearcloudz » Mon Aug 28, 2023 6:29 am

TallyTracker wrote:
Clearcloudz wrote:11 feet storm surge in parts of Tampa Bay. :eek: Are officials in Tampa waiting for 11 AM advisory for evacuations cause they are cutting it close when it comes giving enough time to educate the people of what might happen.

https://i.imgur.com/ARtyJpp.jpg


They need to get those evacuations going now. Even Idalia passing on the current center of the track will flood the lower parts of the Tampa Bay Area. And Tampa is still in the cone only 36 hours out. That’s more than enough justification to start mandatory evacuations of the lower surge zones.


Recency bias is a real thing because Tampa Bay was evacuated during Ian and turned out to be nothing for Tampa Bay. Now they will wait till as long as they can before issuing anything. The stronger this storm gets the higher the chances of it turning east earlier than forecasted in my opinion. History shows that clearly.
3 likes   

User avatar
aspen
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8818
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 7:10 pm
Location: Connecticut, USA

Re: ATL: IDALIA - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#1189 Postby aspen » Mon Aug 28, 2023 6:30 am

LLC is at 20.6N and 85.15W.
1 likes   
Irene '11 Sandy '12 Hermine '16 5/15/2018 Derecho Fay '20 Isaias '20 Elsa '21 Henri '21 Ida '21

I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.

User avatar
GCANE
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 11500
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 8:03 am

Re: ATL: IDALIA - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#1190 Postby GCANE » Mon Aug 28, 2023 6:37 am

Recon
990.4 mb
20.6N 85.2W
0 likes   

User avatar
Hypercane_Kyle
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3354
Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2015 7:58 pm
Location: Cape Canaveral, FL

Re: ATL: IDALIA - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#1191 Postby Hypercane_Kyle » Mon Aug 28, 2023 6:41 am

GCANE wrote:Recon
990.4 mb
20.6N 85.2W


Saw some 57 knot SFMRs too... although they may be rain contaminated.
0 likes   
My posts are my own personal opinion, defer to the National Hurricane Center (NHC) and other NOAA products for decision making during hurricane season.

Chemmers
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 220
Joined: Wed Jul 22, 2020 6:16 am

Re: ATL: IDALIA - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#1192 Postby Chemmers » Mon Aug 28, 2023 6:44 am

Looks like the shear has drop to 15 knot now
0 likes   

User avatar
kevin
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2587
Age: 26
Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2019 4:35 am

Re: ATL: IDALIA - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#1193 Postby kevin » Mon Aug 28, 2023 6:47 am

Chemmers wrote:Looks like the shear has drop to 15 knot now


Indeed, shear dropped at least 5 kt over the last 3 hours. If the trend continues it'll allow Idalia to get itself together faster. Also note the near-perfect shear environment for Franklin atm.

Image
2 likes   

User avatar
GCANE
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 11500
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 8:03 am

Re: ATL: IDALIA - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#1194 Postby GCANE » Mon Aug 28, 2023 6:50 am

About 90% RH thru the eye
0 likes   

Poonwalker
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 270
Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2022 11:12 am

Re: ATL: IDALIA - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#1195 Postby Poonwalker » Mon Aug 28, 2023 6:50 am

Clearcloudz wrote:
TallyTracker wrote:
Clearcloudz wrote:11 feet storm surge in parts of Tampa Bay. :eek: Are officials in Tampa waiting for 11 AM advisory for evacuations cause they are cutting it close when it comes giving enough time to educate the people of what might happen.

https://i.imgur.com/ARtyJpp.jpg


They need to get those evacuations going now. Even Idalia passing on the current center of the track will flood the lower parts of the Tampa Bay Area. And Tampa is still in the cone only 36 hours out. That’s more than enough justification to start mandatory evacuations of the lower surge zones.


Recency bias is a real thing because Tampa Bay was evacuated during Ian and turned out to be nothing for Tampa Bay. Now they will wait till as long as they can before issuing anything. The stronger this storm gets the higher the chances of it turning east earlier than forecasted in my opinion. History shows that clearly.

The stronger they are the more effect a trough has in the steering. This is true
1 likes   

User avatar
Jr0d
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1409
Joined: Tue Aug 27, 2019 10:52 am
Location: Cayo Hueso

Re: ATL: IDALIA - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#1196 Postby Jr0d » Mon Aug 28, 2023 6:54 am

NAVAIDNICK wrote:
Jr0d wrote:I really hope my location bias and fatigue is not clouding my judgement, but I see this making landfall further south towards Sarasota.

A landfall south of Tampa Bay would be much better in terms of economic damage and casualties as it would limit or even prevent surge by blowing the water out the bay.

Obviously this is bad for those in Sarasota, Englewood , ect.., but in terms of potential poss of life it is a better scenario.



As someone who lives in Sarasota, I adamantly disagree that a southern/eastern landfall is a "better scenario", especially since there are a lot of people down here still recovering from Ian. I have neighbors with tarps on their roofs still and It's only been a couple of months since my house got repaired. I get that you think that because of it being less densely populated but the last thing that our communities need is to have to recover all over again. Heck, there are places down here that never recovered from Irma, so we don't need another "I" storm to undo all the progress we've made.


It is better in terms of potential loss of life.

A major hurricane making landfall at St. Pete or just north of Tampa Bay will put over one million at risk of being inundated with storm, especially many low income areas that have no means of evacuating.

While it is tough to say one area is better, despite the recovery effort from Ian, most of those living near the coast in surge prone areas from Sarasota south are not only capable of evacuating, they also have insurance and are statistically much better off economically than the many 'urban' areas of Tampa/St. Pete that could be potentially underwater.

While there is no good outcome, a landfall south of Tampa will no doubt cause countless less casualties than one as described.

Tampa is one of the most vulnerable areas in the US for a catastrophic surge event from a major hurricane. The only heavily populated area that is decidedly more vulnerable is New Orleans.
2 likes   

tolakram
Admin
Admin
Posts: 20012
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)

Re: ATL: IDALIA - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#1197 Postby tolakram » Mon Aug 28, 2023 6:58 am

Jr0d wrote:
NAVAIDNICK wrote:
Jr0d wrote:I really hope my location bias and fatigue is not clouding my judgement, but I see this making landfall further south towards Sarasota.

A landfall south of Tampa Bay would be much better in terms of economic damage and casualties as it would limit or even prevent surge by blowing the water out the bay.

Obviously this is bad for those in Sarasota, Englewood , ect.., but in terms of potential poss of life it is a better scenario.



As someone who lives in Sarasota, I adamantly disagree that a southern/eastern landfall is a "better scenario", especially since there are a lot of people down here still recovering from Ian. I have neighbors with tarps on their roofs still and It's only been a couple of months since my house got repaired. I get that you think that because of it being less densely populated but the last thing that our communities need is to have to recover all over again. Heck, there are places down here that never recovered from Irma, so we don't need another "I" storm to undo all the progress we've made.


It is better it terms of potential loss of life.

A major hurricane making landfall at St. Pete or just north of Tampa Bay will put over one million at risk of being inundated with storm, especially many low income areas that have no means of evacuating.

While it is tough to say one area is better, despite the recovery effort from Ian, most of those living near the coast in surge prone areas from Sarasota south are not only capable of evacuating, they also have insurance and are statistically much better off economically than the many 'urban' areas of Tampa/St. Pete that could be potentially underwater.

While there is no good outcome, a landfall south of Tampa will no doubt cause countless less casualties than one as described.

Tampa is one of the most vulnerable areas in the US for a catastrophic surge event from a major hurricane. The only heavily populated area that is decidedly more vulnerable is New Orleans.


Let's stop where it might be better to hit please. The storm will go where it goes. EVERYONE should be prepared and not surprised if a wobble ruins their day.
8 likes   
M a r k
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
InfernoFlameCat
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2102
Age: 22
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2020 10:52 am
Location: Buford, GA

Re: ATL: IDALIA - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#1198 Postby InfernoFlameCat » Mon Aug 28, 2023 7:03 am

This system is so similar to others that hit Florida as majors, the only difference is that it’s in august.
0 likes   
I am by no means a professional. DO NOT look at my forecasts for official information or make decisions based on what I post.

Goal: to become a registered expert over tropical and subtropical cyclones.

User avatar
GCANE
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 11500
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 8:03 am

Re: ATL: IDALIA - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#1199 Postby GCANE » Mon Aug 28, 2023 7:05 am

Looks like dry air will be less of an issue.
That UL Dry Slot north of Idalia is starting to fire off convection along a dry line.
Around 24.5N 85W.
1 likes   

Grumpy
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 24
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2022 9:45 am

Re: ATL: IDALIA - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#1200 Postby Grumpy » Mon Aug 28, 2023 7:07 am

NAVAIDNICK wrote:
Jr0d wrote:I really hope my location bias and fatigue is not clouding my judgement, but I see this making landfall further south towards Sarasota.

A landfall south of Tampa Bay would be much better in terms of economic damage and casualties as it would limit or even prevent surge by blowing the water out the bay.

Obviously this is bad for those in Sarasota, Englewood , ect.., but in terms of potential poss of life it is a better scenario.



As someone who lives in Sarasota, I adamantly disagree that a southern/eastern landfall is a "better scenario", especially since there are a lot of people down here still recovering from Ian. I have neighbors with tarps on their roofs still and It's only been a couple of months since my house got repaired. I get that you think that because of it being less densely populated but the last thing that our communities need is to have to recover all over again. Heck, there are places down here that never recovered from Irma, so we don't need another "I" storm to undo all the progress we've made.


From a fellow Sarasota resident, Amen
0 likes   


Return to “2023”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests