ATL: LEE - Post-Tropical - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
Hugo1989
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 147
Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 9:09 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 95L - Discussion: 2 PM TWO: 90%/100%

#161 Postby Hugo1989 » Mon Sep 04, 2023 1:47 pm

Nobody can affirm that Puerto Rico is clear from a potential impact of this system. I just got a bad feeling, and they should monitor this system closely!
0 likes   

zhukm29
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 279
Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2018 2:37 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 95L - Discussion: 2 PM TWO: 90%/100%

#162 Postby zhukm29 » Mon Sep 04, 2023 1:48 pm

I wonder if future 13L will be one of those rare systems with a M in its first advisory. I think only Tomas and Sam had a 100kt forecast point in advisory 1, but with the model guidance going absolutely nuts, this could be our next candidate. :eek:
0 likes   

MarioProtVI
Category 4
Category 4
Posts: 932
Age: 23
Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2019 7:33 pm
Location: New Jersey

Re: ATL: INVEST 95L - Discussion: 2 PM TWO: 90%/100%

#163 Postby MarioProtVI » Mon Sep 04, 2023 1:55 pm

I’ll be honest given the amount of models being very bullish with this I’ll be a bit disappointed if this doesn’t become a Cat 5.
2 likes   

Cachondo23
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 73
Joined: Wed May 25, 2022 5:56 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 95L - Discussion: 2 PM TWO: 90%/100%

#164 Postby Cachondo23 » Mon Sep 04, 2023 2:04 pm

Hugo1989 wrote:Nobody can affirm that Puerto Rico is clear from a potential impact of this system. I just got a bad feeling, and they should monitor this system closely!

If this develops tonight or tomorrow AM, difficult to go straight to NE Caribbean, even more hard to the PR area. I don’t see the thought of “the longer it takes to develop the more west it goes”…
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 143871
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 95L - Discussion: 2 PM TWO: 90%/100%

#165 Postby cycloneye » Mon Sep 04, 2023 2:08 pm

AL, 95, 2023090418, , BEST, 0, 114N, 349W, 30, 1010, LO
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
kevin
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2554
Age: 26
Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2019 4:35 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 95L - Discussion: 2 PM TWO: 90%/100%

#166 Postby kevin » Mon Sep 04, 2023 2:34 pm

zhukm29 wrote:I wonder if future 13L will be one of those rare systems with a M in its first advisory. I think only Tomas and Sam had a 100kt forecast point in advisory 1, but with the model guidance going absolutely nuts, this could be our next candidate. :eek:


I have a nice overview for this :lol:. Posted it with Larry and Sam, here is the updated version for the first advisory peak intensity. Based on NHC advisories since 1998 (of which the 1998 - 2002 advisories only went to +72 hrs).

100 kt
2021 - Sam
2010 - Tomas

95 kt
2022 - Ian
2021 - Ida
2020 - Iota
2019 - Lorenzo
2012 - Isaac
2010 - Danielle
2005 - Philippe
2004 - Karl

90 kt
2021 - Larry
2017 - Jose
2016 - Matthew
2009 - Bill
2007 - Dean

85 kt
2020 - Delta
2015 - Danny
2014 - Gonzalo
2011 - Katia
2010 - Earl
2010 - Igor
2006 - Helene
2005 - Wilma

80 kt
2022 - Danielle
2020 - Teddy
2019 - Jerry
2017 - Irma
2017 - Maria
2016 - Gaston
2012 - Leslie
2005 - Rita
2004 - Earl
1999 - Emily

Edit: Thanks SconnieCane, added Irma to the 80 kt list.
Edit2: Thanks Extratropical94 for the other 3 additions.
Last edited by kevin on Mon Sep 04, 2023 4:32 pm, edited 4 times in total.
12 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 143871
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 95L - Discussion: 2 PM TWO: 90%/100%

#167 Postby cycloneye » Mon Sep 04, 2023 2:35 pm

4 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

SconnieCane
Category 4
Category 4
Posts: 997
Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2018 5:29 pm
Location: Madison, WI

Re: ATL: INVEST 95L - Discussion: 2 PM TWO: 90%/100%

#168 Postby SconnieCane » Mon Sep 04, 2023 2:40 pm

kevin wrote:
zhukm29 wrote:I wonder if future 13L will be one of those rare systems with a M in its first advisory. I think only Tomas and Sam had a 100kt forecast point in advisory 1, but with the model guidance going absolutely nuts, this could be our next candidate. :eek:


I have a nice overview for this :lol:. Posted it with Larry and Sam, here is the updated version for the first advisory peak intensity. Based on NHC advisories since 1998 (of which the 1998 - 2002 advisories only went to +72 hrs).

100 kt
2021 - Sam
2010 - Tomas

95 kt
2022 - Ian
2021 - Ida
2020 - Iota
2019 - Lorenzo
2012 - Isaac
2010 - Danielle
2005 - Philippe
2004 - Karl

90 kt
2021 - Larry
2017 - Jose
2016 - Matthew
2009 - Bill
2007 - Dean

85 kt
2020 - Delta
2015 - Danny
2014 - Gonzalo
2011 - Katia
2010 - Earl
2010 - Igor
2005 - Wilma

80 kt
2022 - Danielle
2020 - Teddy
2019 - Jerry
2017 - Maria
2016 - Gaston
2012 - Leslie
2005 - Rita


Irma of 2017 was in the 80kt group as well. I'm actually surprised it wasn't more bullish, given the fact that it was already designated a 45-kt TS at the time advisories were initiated. However the advisory discussion did mention some adverse conditions coming up, and the soon-to-be infamous cyclone did indeed struggle with them for a couple of days before blowing up as it approached the Leewards.
0 likes   

User avatar
aspen
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8812
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 7:10 pm
Location: Connecticut, USA

Re: ATL: INVEST 95L - Discussion

#169 Postby aspen » Mon Sep 04, 2023 2:46 pm

This has such a good mid-level spin. It just needs some convection over the center to work that down to the surface and tighten it. Most of the deep convection over the last two days has been limited to the northern border of the circulation.
0 likes   
Irene '11 Sandy '12 Hermine '16 5/15/2018 Derecho Fay '20 Isaias '20 Elsa '21 Henri '21 Ida '21

I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.

User avatar
CyclonicFury
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2019
Age: 26
Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2017 12:32 pm
Location: NC
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 95L - Discussion: 2 PM TWO: 90%/100%

#170 Postby CyclonicFury » Mon Sep 04, 2023 2:52 pm


Sam 2021 had a very similar feature before it formed, which went on to become a long-track 135kt C4.
 https://twitter.com/AndyHazelton/status/1440478046012641290


6 likes   
NCSU B.S. in Meteorology Class of 2021. Tropical weather blogger at http://www.cyclonicfury.com. My forecasts and thoughts are NOT official, for official forecasts please consult the National Hurricane Center.

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 143871
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 95L - Discussion

#171 Postby cycloneye » Mon Sep 04, 2023 3:04 pm

4 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
Extratropical94
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 3538
Age: 30
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2010 6:36 am
Location: Hamburg, Germany
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 95L - Discussion: 2 PM TWO: 90%/100%

#172 Postby Extratropical94 » Mon Sep 04, 2023 3:17 pm

kevin wrote:
zhukm29 wrote:I wonder if future 13L will be one of those rare systems with a M in its first advisory. I think only Tomas and Sam had a 100kt forecast point in advisory 1, but with the model guidance going absolutely nuts, this could be our next candidate. :eek:


I have a nice overview for this :lol:. Posted it with Larry and Sam, here is the updated version for the first advisory peak intensity. Based on NHC advisories since 1998 (of which the 1998 - 2002 advisories only went to +72 hrs).

[...]


Just ran a script through the archives and found three more storms that are missing on here:

85 kt
2006 - Helene

80 kt
2004 - Earl
1999 - Emily
6 likes   
54° 11' 59'' N, 9° 9' 20'' E
Boomer Sooner!
Go Broncos! Go Cards! Go Niners!
- Daniel

User avatar
Emmett_Brown
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1432
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 9:10 pm
Location: Sarasota FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 95L - Discussion

#173 Postby Emmett_Brown » Mon Sep 04, 2023 3:19 pm

Short term motion is kind of interesting. Obviously there is no distinct center yet, so it's not possible to confirm a specific heading. But it appears to be tracking straight W 270 degrees. The cluster of models including the TVCN blended guidance suggest that the storm should already be moving more WNW, and continue for the next 5 days. This matters for the Leeward islands.
4 likes   

SconnieCane
Category 4
Category 4
Posts: 997
Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2018 5:29 pm
Location: Madison, WI

Re: ATL: INVEST 95L - Discussion

#174 Postby SconnieCane » Mon Sep 04, 2023 3:34 pm

Global and hurricane models suggest at a minimum this will be a very close call for the far northern Leewards. Ironic since the ghost of this year's edition is still pinwheeling around in the belly of zombie Franklin; but perhaps a Jose 2017-like track would be a close analog.
1 likes   

Sciencerocks
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8903
Age: 39
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2017 1:51 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 95L - Discussion

#175 Postby Sciencerocks » Mon Sep 04, 2023 3:39 pm

Image
3 likes   

Dsci4
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 15
Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2023 2:32 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 95L - Discussion

#176 Postby Dsci4 » Mon Sep 04, 2023 3:59 pm

Emmett_Brown wrote:Short term motion is kind of interesting. Obviously there is no distinct center yet, so it's not possible to confirm a specific heading. But it appears to be tracking straight W 270 degrees. The cluster of models including the TVCN blended guidance suggest that the storm should already be moving more WNW, and continue for the next 5 days. This matters for the Leeward islands.


I agree with you. I’ve been watching the visible for signs of a center and it does appear to be moving much more westerly all day today. And we don’t have an official center which could complicate the starting point of the models especially if it pulls a fast one and forms toward the southern half. I don’t think they have the track wrong as it crosses the Atlantic but we most certainly don’t want early track errors to start a trend
2 likes   

floridasun
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 196
Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2021 3:59 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 95L - Discussion

#177 Postby floridasun » Mon Sep 04, 2023 4:05 pm

we need hope this will be out to sea if become cat 3 or 4
0 likes   

User avatar
ConvergenceZone
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5194
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:40 am
Location: Northern California

ATL: INVEST 95L - Models

#178 Postby ConvergenceZone » Mon Sep 04, 2023 4:05 pm

While you can never say never, I'm really liking today's trends of bringing the storm even further offshore than before, probably due to quick anticipated strengthening. Now we just need to get it East of Bermuda and we will be in good shape! Feeling much much better today than a few days ago that's for sure...I've loving all of these storms moving out to sea. The one we had in Florida as enough for the year........
1 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 143871
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 95L - Discussion

#179 Postby cycloneye » Mon Sep 04, 2023 4:06 pm

Believe me, I am watching from PR closely every motion 95L is doing as it will be important down the road. I am sure our friends in the Leewards and Virgin Islands are also watching.
9 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
kevin
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2554
Age: 26
Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2019 4:35 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 95L - Discussion: 2 PM TWO: 90%/100%

#180 Postby kevin » Mon Sep 04, 2023 4:19 pm

Extratropical94 wrote:
kevin wrote:
zhukm29 wrote:I wonder if future 13L will be one of those rare systems with a M in its first advisory. I think only Tomas and Sam had a 100kt forecast point in advisory 1, but with the model guidance going absolutely nuts, this could be our next candidate. :eek:


I have a nice overview for this :lol:. Posted it with Larry and Sam, here is the updated version for the first advisory peak intensity. Based on NHC advisories since 1998 (of which the 1998 - 2002 advisories only went to +72 hrs).

[...]


Just ran a script through the archives and found three more storms that are missing on here:

85 kt
2006 - Helene

80 kt
2004 - Earl
1999 - Emily


Thanks, I added it to my post. Now the overview should be complete :D.
1 likes   


Return to “2023”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 38 guests