Al Qaeda Targeting Pearl Harbor

[southerngale]

Terrorists aim at Pearl Harbor

------------------------------------------
By Bill Gertz
THE WASHINGTON TIMES
------------------------------------------

Terrorists linked to al Qaeda have targeted U.S. military facilities in Pearl Harbor, including nuclear-powered submarines and ships, The Washington Times has learned.

Intelligence reports about the terrorist threat to the Hawaiian harbor bombed by the Japanese in World War II were sent to senior U.S. officials in the past two weeks and coincided with reports of the planning of a major attack by Osama bin Laden's terrorist group. Officials said the reports were one of the reasons that led to the recent heightened security threat alert. The alert status has since been lowered.
According to officials familiar with the reports, al Qaeda is planning an attack on Pearl Harbor because of its symbolic value and because its military facilities are open from the air.
The attacks would be carried out by hijacked airliners from nearby Honolulu International Airport that would be flown into submarines or ships docked at Pearl Harbor in suicide missions, said officials who spoke on the condition of anonymity.
"The targeting includes nuclear ships and submarines and military facilities in the Pearl Harbor area," a defense official said.
The harbor is the home for 30 Navy and Coast Guard warships, including 18 nuclear submarines, five destroyers and two frigates.
An additional terrorist target is said to be Hickam Air Force Base, located next to Honolulu airport and less than five miles from Pearl Harbor. Warplanes, transports and refueling tankers are based there.
A second official said the intelligence information about the threat also indicated the harbor was targeted because of its openness.
"They could easily attack submarines in port with hijacked airliners," this official said.
Hawaii's airport is a key stopover and refueling point for commercial airliners coming from Asia to the United States.
In 1995, al Qaeda terrorists were found to have planned a series of attacks using bombs planted on commercial airliners departing from Asia. The plan, known as Project Bojinka, was thwarted by the arrest of one of the plotters in Manila.
However, U.S. officials said a key feature of al Qaeda is its determination to carry out unfinished attacks, as the strike on the World Trade Center towers showed. The first attack in 1993 was unsuccessful in knocking down the two skyscrapers.
A spokesman for the U.S. Pacific Command, based in Hawaii, had no comment.
A defense official in Hawaii said no extra security measures have been taken in response to the intelligence reports.
"All the installations down here are on a pretty high state of security and have been for a number of months," the official said. "Security at Pearl Harbor has been at a heightened state for some time."
Security, however, has been increased at nearby Honolulu International Airport, where vehicle checks have been stepped up in recent days, the official said.
A spokesman for the airport could not be reached for comment yesterday.
Pearl Harbor was attacked by Japanese warplanes on December 7, 1941, in a surprise raid that sunk numerous ships but missed several aircraft carriers that had been sent to sea in advance of the attack.
The threat to Pearl Harbor comes as al Qaeda terrorists are said to be planning a major attack against the United States, either on U.S. territory or overseas.
Intelligence reports last month indicated that the Islamist terror group wants to carry out a major attack to rival the September 11 strikes on the Pentagon and World Trade Center. According to the reports, the attack could be preceded by smaller-scale attacks, such as assassinations of public figures or smaller bombing attacks.
The major attack is suspected by the CIA to be al Qaeda's first attack using deadly chemical, biological or radiological weapons.
The threat warnings prompted the Bush administration last month to raise the color-coded terrorist threat level from "elevated" to "high," or Orange. However, the alert status was lowered last week back to "elevated," or Yellow.
A U.S. intelligence official said numerous intelligence reports of terrorist planning and targeting are likely to lead to another raising of the alert status in the near future.
It is not clear what effect the arrest of a senior al Qaeda leader on Saturday will have for the group's plans for major attacks.
Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, one of the most senior al Qaeda terrorist planners, was arrested in Rawalpindi, Pakistan, and U.S. officials said he had been involved in recent attacks and planning for attacks.
One official said it is not clear yet whether Mohammed's arrest will weaken the al Qaeda organization, but it could disrupt some operations.
Since the U.S.-led ouster of the ruling Taliban in Afghanistan, al Qaeda terrorists have been dispersed outside the country.
U.S. intelligence agencies say al Qaeda is adapting to a less centralized structure that may provide individual terrorist cells, operating in about 60 countries, more autonomy to conduct attacks without the approval of senior leaders.
Al Qaeda also has begun to focus its attacks on targets that could result in economic disruption.
The last major al Qaeda-linked attack took place Oct. 12 in Bali, Indonesia, when terrorists firebombed two nightclubs. Nearly 200 people were killed, most of them foreign tourists.

[pojo]

Not again! So I take it that they don't remember what happened back around WWII. Hey Japan, revenge is sweet!

[wx247]

Interesting informative article. Thanks for posting it! That does make a lot of sense about going to try to strike there again like they did with the WTC.

Garrett

[Rainband]

Then they should have left the level where it was


Johnathan

[mf_dolphin]

Looks like there really was a reason for raising the threat level.

[Rainband]

Looks like there really was a reason for raising the threat level.

I MEANT THEY SHOULD HAVE LEFT IT RAISED


JOHNATHAN

[mf_dolphin]

Just like we don't always know why the threat level was raised we also don't know why they dropped it. In times like these you have to assume that they know more than we do and just accept it.

[Rainband]

An assumption isn't always accurate The Homeland security agency is a baby that just started teething..scary thought IMO..They are doing the best they can I guess



Johnathan

[mf_dolphin]

My point is that they have the information that we don't. The most you and I can do is keep our eyes and ears open and pay attention to our surroundings. Anything else is out of our control and worrying about it is going to get you nowhere but the hospital with an ulcer.

[Rainband]

I understand that and am just trying to say, they aren't experienced at this and some of the info is guessing Why be worried if they aren't even sure :? :? I just think they shouldn't be acting like they know it all when it's still new to them



Johnathan 8)

[mf_dolphin]

Intelligence gathering and analisys is nothing new. What is new is that for once some of the barriers to interagency sharing of information are being torn down. If you notice in the article the following:

A defense official in Hawaii said no extra security measures have been taken in response to the intelligence reports. "All the installations down here are on a pretty high state of security and have been for a number of months," the official said. "Security at Pearl Harbor has been at a heightened state for some time." Security, however, has been increased at nearby Honolulu International Airport, where vehicle checks have been stepped up in recent days, the official said.

They've been on a heightened state of alert for months.

[Rainband]

I just think if their info was so good, they could have put Just Hawaii on alert and not scare us all. Don't get me wrong they are doing a great job, as good as they can I wouldn't want it :o


Johnathan

[mf_dolphin]

You're assuming Hawaii was the only place that they had information on...

Like I said, you just can't worry about things that you can't control.

[Rainband]

I try not too




Johnathan

[M2]

That's correct Marshall, but I also understand where you're coming from Rainband. There were several places targeted that the government discussed lately such as NY, DC, Empire State Bldg, suspension bridges, etc., and also other areas within the country. Now instead of just alerting only specific potential sites, they issued a blanket threat level. There is nothing wrong with that logically if you think about it. If you have guards at the front & side doors, the thief will try to gain access around the back. They'll look for the 'non-protected' areas - areas not under a specific threat alert; hence the blanket alert. If they alerted 10 specific cities, you can be sure that cities # 11-though-xx would seem to be better targets since they're out of the threat area - like a tornado with an attitude which hits out of the Tornado Watch area. Who is at fault, the forecasters for missing the rogue tornado, or the people who didn't pay attention and watch for signs and threatening weather since they were 'near' the Watch box??

BTW, the FBI/CIA are the groups providing continuing intelligence that fuels the threat level. They're not babies by any means. The CIA and FBI are still intact as their own entities; some of their departments though have moved over to Homeland Security to provide communications and synergy; they haven't disappeared (as a group that is). Now you see them, now you don't

[Rainband]

That makes alot of sense M2 Thanks for the input


Johnathan 8)