MATAGORDA, BRAZORIA, GALVESTON, CHAMBERS, JEFFERSON, ORANGE, FORT BEND, LIBERTY, HARDIN, JASPER, NEWTON, TYLER COUNTIES ALSO NEED TO PREPARE.
BERYL MOVING APPROX. 12 mph NNW

Moderator: S2k Moderators
Tireman4 wrote:Charleswachal wrote:capNstorms wrote:
SETX mets took a big whiff as well, told everyone we were goooood and it was going to mexico/southern texas just before july 4th, no one is thinking about this storm, until now.....
Interesting enough. Travis Herzog continued to talk about how it was going to be able to potentially turn and head our way. Many of the other meteorologists in Houston did not say that, but he was constantly saying that. I feel like he had the best handle on the potential for a Houston landfall.
Travis is a quality met, BS in Meteorology from A&M. I think the models were having issues all along ( the ICON not included). I am not going to yell at Matt Lanza ( he has taken a beating on Twitter or X) , by the way. I still trust him, BS in Meteorology from Rutgers, but he is not the only one that might have whiffed on this. Beryl has not been your typical storm ( major in June and July), first in many categories.
HurricaneBrain wrote:I think the main problem people have with some mets is the extremely confident verbiage they use. For example, three days ago there were Houston mets saying Beryl will be a South Texas storm. Five days ago, Beryl will be hitting Brownsville. Pro met or not, I don’t agree with the usage of that verbiage. Travis does an EXCELLENT job of not doing this, and at the same time, doesn’t instill fear into viewers/Facebook followers. Travis is good about saying a storm is expected to do x, but things could change due to the situation being fluid. Just my two cents.Charleswachal wrote:capNstorms wrote:
SETX mets took a big whiff as well, told everyone we were goooood and it was going to mexico/southern texas just before july 4th, no one is thinking about this storm, until now.....
Interesting enough. Travis Herzog continued to talk about how it was going to be able to potentially turn and head our way. Many of the other meteorologists in Houston did not say that, but he was constantly saying that. I feel like he had the best handle on the potential for a Houston landfall.
Charleswachal wrote:HurricaneBrain wrote:I think the main problem people have with some mets is the extremely confident verbiage they use. For example, three days ago there were Houston mets saying Beryl will be a South Texas storm. Five days ago, Beryl will be hitting Brownsville. Pro met or not, I don’t agree with the usage of that verbiage. Travis does an EXCELLENT job of not doing this, and at the same time, doesn’t instill fear into viewers/Facebook followers. Travis is good about saying a storm is expected to do x, but things could change due to the situation being fluid. Just my two cents.Charleswachal wrote:
Interesting enough. Travis Herzog continued to talk about how it was going to be able to potentially turn and head our way. Many of the other meteorologists in Houston did not say that, but he was constantly saying that. I feel like he had the best handle on the potential for a Houston landfall.
THIS!
There was so much definitive wording used by so many of the meteorologists. I was posting on my personal Facebook page that I actually thought it was going to go to matagorda Bay over and over again. I was criticized by a lot of people because they would say well. My meteorologist says it's not going here. I kept sharing Travis's posts about the outside risk of it coming to Houston and was criticized pretty bad. Too many meteorologist used definitive wording when talking about how this was going to go to Brownsville.
hipshot wrote:HoustonFrog wrote:capNstorms wrote:
"Pro mets in Houston are very confident that Beryl isn't much of a risk to Galveston"
oh have the tables have turned
SCW screwed up bad. About four days ago they said it may results in some rain and wrote it off. Even yesterday said impacts manageable and now this morning saying significant impacts with likely heavy power outages.
Big whiff
Where is RGV?
hipshot wrote:HoustonFrog wrote:capNstorms wrote:
"Pro mets in Houston are very confident that Beryl isn't much of a risk to Galveston"
oh have the tables have turned
SCW screwed up bad. About four days ago they said it may results in some rain and wrote it off. Even yesterday said impacts manageable and now this morning saying significant impacts with likely heavy power outages.
Big whiff
Where is RGV?
ScottNAtlanta wrote:Tireman4 wrote:Charleswachal wrote:
Interesting enough. Travis Herzog continued to talk about how it was going to be able to potentially turn and head our way. Many of the other meteorologists in Houston did not say that, but he was constantly saying that. I feel like he had the best handle on the potential for a Houston landfall.
Travis is a quality met, BS in Meteorology from A&M. I think the models were having issues all along ( the ICON not included). I am not going to yell at Matt Lanza ( he has taken a beating on Twitter or X) , by the way. I still trust him, BS in Meteorology from Rutgers, but he is not the only one that might have whiffed on this. Beryl has not been your typical storm ( major in June and July), first in many categories.
I don't know who any of these people are, but it's pretty easy to criticize in a forum where you don't have to take into account the consequences of your forecast or the exact wording so you don't have people panicking and such. These people are under a lot of pressure right now. Their wording on things matter, so cut them some slack.
Tireman4 wrote:Charleswachal wrote:capNstorms wrote:
SETX mets took a big whiff as well, told everyone we were goooood and it was going to mexico/southern texas just before july 4th, no one is thinking about this storm, until now.....
Interesting enough. Travis Herzog continued to talk about how it was going to be able to potentially turn and head our way. Many of the other meteorologists in Houston did not say that, but he was constantly saying that. I feel like he had the best handle on the potential for a Houston landfall.
Travis is a quality met, BS in Meteorology from A&M. I think the models were having issues all along ( the ICON not included). I am not going to yell at Matt Lanza ( he has taken a beating on Twitter or X) , by the way. I still trust him, BS in Meteorology from Rutgers, but he is not the only one that might have whiffed on this. Beryl has not been your typical storm ( major in June and July), first in many categories.
CycloysisNegative wrote:Charleswachal wrote:Tireman4 wrote:
Travis is a quality met, BS in Meteorology from A&M. I think the models were having issues all along ( the ICON not included). I am not going to yell at Matt Lanza ( he has taken a beating on Twitter or X) , by the way. I still trust him, BS in Meteorology from Rutgers, but he is not the only one that might have whiffed on this. Beryl has not been your typical storm ( major in June and July), first in many categories.
Yes, but any meteorologist in Houston should know that you never write off a storm in the Gulf until it has made its turn. Way too often we see. Crazy things happen.
Not to mention his misunderstanding of something as basic as the NHCs cone of uncertainty. That’s tough to look past.
capNstorms wrote:the last few frames really show the system getting its act together
https://cdn.star.nesdis.noaa.gov/GOES16/GLM/SECTOR/gm/EXTENT3/GOES16-GM-EXTENT3-1000x1000.gif
jabman98 wrote:CycloysisNegative wrote:Charleswachal wrote:
Yes, but any meteorologist in Houston should know that you never write off a storm in the Gulf until it has made its turn. Way too often we see. Crazy things happen.
Not to mention his misunderstanding of something as basic as the NHCs cone of uncertainty. That’s tough to look past.
Travis has been very good. He's by far the best of the local tv mets for forecasting Beryl. On Channel 2 this morning the met said Beryl was due to make landfall on Saturday. There was no catching her mistake or correction later. Messaging like that can be dangerous.
In Houston it really does feel like the calm before the storm right now. Heavy, still air. Not looking forward to what's to come.
ScottNAtlanta wrote:Charleswachal wrote:HurricaneBrain wrote:I think the main problem people have with some mets is the extremely confident verbiage they use. For example, three days ago there were Houston mets saying Beryl will be a South Texas storm. Five days ago, Beryl will be hitting Brownsville. Pro met or not, I don’t agree with the usage of that verbiage. Travis does an EXCELLENT job of not doing this, and at the same time, doesn’t instill fear into viewers/Facebook followers. Travis is good about saying a storm is expected to do x, but things could change due to the situation being fluid. Just my two cents.
THIS!
There was so much definitive wording used by so many of the meteorologists. I was posting on my personal Facebook page that I actually thought it was going to go to matagorda Bay over and over again. I was criticized by a lot of people because they would say well. My meteorologist says it's not going here. I kept sharing Travis's posts about the outside risk of it coming to Houston and was criticized pretty bad. Too many meteorologist used definitive wording when talking about how this was going to go to Brownsville.
When it comes to the tropics...one should never talk in absolutes. Things can always change in unexpected ways. You can have a 95% chance, but then there is a 5% chance it's wrong
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot], kevin and 4 guests