toad strangler wrote:I guess "blob" is the buzz word for this year
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XzHDvzGmmw0
Moderator: S2k Moderators
toad strangler wrote:I guess "blob" is the buzz word for this year
Teban54 wrote:Correction: The title should say ACE 230, not 240. The Net Tropical Cyclone Activity (NTC) forecast was 240.
Recap of this year's CSU forecasts so far:
- April 2024: 23/11/5, ACE 210, NS/H/MH days 115/45/13
- June 2024: 23/11/5, ACE 210, NS/H/MH days 115/45/13 (carbon copy of Apr 24)
- July 2024: 25/12/6, ACE 230, NS/H/MH days 120/50/16
- July 2024, remainder of season only: 22/11/5, ACE 194, NS/H/MH days 108.25/43.75/11.5
So even for people that want to argue the rest of 2024 could be less active than originally forecast, CSU's numbers have only taken off 1 TS, 16 ACE, and 1.5 MH days.
Iceresistance wrote: https://x.com/MatthewCappucci/status/1810704246649573408
I would take this prediction with a grain of salt, but with a C5 July Beryl we had earlier, I am unfortunately not surprised by the uptick in the prediction
toad strangler wrote:CSU's updated analog seasons ....![]()
1886, 1926, 1933, 1995, 2005, 2010, 2020
toad strangler wrote:CSU's updated analog seasons ....![]()
1886, 1926, 1933, 1995, 2005, 2010, 2020
Hammy wrote:
Interesting 2010 is yet another one of those seasons with barely anything between early July and late August
Spacecoast wrote:Perhaps someone could answer...
The June 11th CSU forecast called for:Jun 2024: 23/11/5, ACE 210, ACE (W of 60W) 125
PROBABILITIES FOR MAJOR LANDFALL (June):
1) Entire continental U.S. coastline – 62%
2) U.S. East Coast Including Peninsula Florida – 34%
3) Gulf Coast from the Florida Panhandle – 42%
PROBABILITY FOR AT LEAST ONE MAJOR TRACKING THROUGH THE CARIBBEAN -66%
As we know, the July 9th CSU forecast increased overall activity to :July 2024: 25/12/6, ACE 230, ACE (W of 60W) 140
The updated CSU probability website https://tropical.colostate.edu/TC_impact.html also showed across the board decrease in 2024 county level probabilities (June - July), while the historical number, probabilities stayed the same.
HOWEVER,
While the overall activity. and ACE forecast have increased, the landfall probabilities have decreased ....
PROBABILITIES FOR MAJOR LANDFALL (July):
1) Entire continental U.S. coastline – 57%
2) U.S. East Coast Including Peninsula Florida – 31%
3) Gulf Coast from the Florida Panhandle – 38%
PROBABILITY FOR AT LEAST ONE MAJOR TRACKING THROUGH THE CARIBBEAN -62%
According to CSU, "the Net landfall probability is shown to be linked to the overall Atlantic basin Accumulated Cyclone Energy (ACE)", and "Long-term statistics show that, on average, the more active the overall Atlantic basin hurricane season is, the greater the probability of U.S. hurricane landfall"
The only explanation that I can think of:
Another factor, (besides ACE, or overall activity) is being considered that would imply a higher number of storms, with a lower number landfalls, (recurves?).
Incidentally, the newest 2024 landfall probabilities (for Florida)
NS: 95%
H: 71%
MH: 40%
are similar to the August 17 2022 landfall probabilities (for Florida)
NS: 95%
H: 72%
MH: 41%
and while the August 17 2022 was forecasting onlyAug 2022: 18/8/4, ACE 150
The probabilities of major landfall (Aug 2022) were greater than the current 2024 probabilities :
1) Entire continental U.S. coastline – 68%
2) U.S. East Coast Including Peninsula Florida – 43%
3) Gulf Coast from the Florida Panhandle – 43%
Except for the caribbean, which was -57% in 2022
I'm confused about how Phil K is calculating these probabilities. They do not appear the be directly proportional to overall activity, or ACE.
LarryWx wrote:
Great observation! I’m confident it’s because:
- Only reason ACE/overall activity increased is that activity through 7/8, day before updated forecast was released, exceeded their expectations through 7/8 in #s and ACE
- The updated activity is still season long. Thus, 7/9 forecast incorporates higher than expected activity prior to 7/8. Therefore, 7/9 fcast increased over 6/11 fcast despite good chance their implied forecast for 7/9+ stayed ~same.
- But OTOH the 7/9 forecast’s MH chances only include 7/9+. The 6/11 fcast MH chances were for 6/11+. There’s a slightly lower chance for MHs 7/11+ vs 6/9+. They decreased them 10% for all areas because it is a month later and thus they’re incorporating one month fewer.
Is there a place to look at the poll from earlier this season?cycloneye wrote:IMO, I think when the early August updates from the public and private firms are out, they may have to lower a little bit. CSU had 25/12/6 on the july update. I say, 2024 season will end as quality vs quantity, but time will tell how in reallity, how it will end.
jlauderdal wrote:Is there a place to look at the poll from earlier this season?cycloneye wrote:IMO, I think when the early August updates from the public and private firms are out, they may have to lower a little bit. CSU had 25/12/6 on the july update. I say, 2024 season will end as quality vs quantity, but time will tell how in reallity, how it will end.
jlauderdal wrote:Is there a place to look at the poll from earlier this season?cycloneye wrote:IMO, I think when the early August updates from the public and private firms are out, they may have to lower a little bit. CSU had 25/12/6 on the july update. I say, 2024 season will end as quality vs quantity, but time will tell how in reallity, how it will end.
Thxcycloneye wrote:jlauderdal wrote:Is there a place to look at the poll from earlier this season?cycloneye wrote:IMO, I think when the early August updates from the public and private firms are out, they may have to lower a little bit. CSU had 25/12/6 on the july update. I say, 2024 season will end as quality vs quantity, but time will tell how in reallity, how it will end.
The S2K poll is at the top of Talking Tropics as sticky.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 936 guests