cycloneye wrote:Quiet until mid August is my take.
https://x.com/RyanMaue/status/1812135823669608570
I believe that is a safe statement. If we have activity before that no one will call you on it or even care.
Moderator: S2k Moderators
cycloneye wrote:Quiet until mid August is my take.
https://x.com/RyanMaue/status/1812135823669608570
MEANINGLESS_NUMBERS wrote:The case for an insane 2024 is starting to crack. La Nina coming later than originally thought, extreme SAL, temperatures not quite as off the charts as they were at the start of the season.
weeniepatrol wrote:MEANINGLESS_NUMBERS wrote:The case for an insane 2024 is starting to crack. La Nina coming later than originally thought, extreme SAL, temperatures not quite as off the charts as they were at the start of the season.
lol.
MEANINGLESS_NUMBERS wrote:The case for an insane 2024 is starting to crack. La Nina coming later than originally thought, extreme SAL, temperatures not quite as off the charts as they were at the start of the season.
MEANINGLESS_NUMBERS wrote:The case for an insane 2024 is starting to crack. La Nina coming later than originally thought, extreme SAL, temperatures not quite as off the charts as they were at the start of the season.
MEANINGLESS_NUMBERS wrote:The case for an insane 2024 is starting to crack. La Nina coming later than originally thought, extreme SAL, temperatures not quite as off the charts as they were at the start of the season.
I will remember, lol. I hope the prediction is correct but its looking more favorable into early august.MetroMike wrote:cycloneye wrote:Quiet until mid August is my take.
https://x.com/RyanMaue/status/1812135823669608570
I believe that is a safe statement. If we have activity before that no one will call you on it or even care.
MEANINGLESS_NUMBERS wrote:The case for an insane 2024 is starting to crack. La Nina coming later than originally thought, extreme SAL, temperatures not quite as off the charts as they were at the start of the season.
MEANINGLESS_NUMBERS wrote:The case for an insane 2024 is starting to crack. La Nina coming later than originally thought, extreme SAL, temperatures not quite as off the charts as they were at the start of the season.
La Nina coming later than originally thought
extreme SAL
temperatures not quite as off the charts as they were at the start of the season
MEANINGLESS_NUMBERS wrote:The case for an insane 2024 is starting to crack. La Nina coming later than originally thought, extreme SAL, temperatures not quite as off the charts as they were at the start of the season.
aspen wrote:MEANINGLESS_NUMBERS wrote:The case for an insane 2024 is starting to crack. La Nina coming later than originally thought, extreme SAL, temperatures not quite as off the charts as they were at the start of the season.
Going from “insane” to “hyperactive”. I’m doubtful those 200+ ACE forecasts are going to verify, but we’re probably on track for 160-200 ACE.
Even if it takes longer for ENSO to fully become a La Niña, the atmospheric effects are already in place: suppressed Pacific and enhanced Atlantic. We may have the least active WPac and EPac seasons on record at this rate, which means they won’t be competing with the Atlantic.
SSTs might not match or exceed 2023 again, but once the standard July/early August SAL outbreaks clear, they should remain among the top 5 highest in the satellite era along with other hyperactive years. 2020 had quite a strong SAL outbreak and still ended up being hyperactive, although that was a west-based season so a SAL outbreak of this magnitude may have some negative effects on its eventual overall activity.
MEANINGLESS_NUMBERS wrote:The case for an insane 2024 is starting to crack. La Nina coming later than originally thought, extreme SAL, temperatures not quite as off the charts as they were at the start of the season.
Hammy wrote:MEANINGLESS_NUMBERS wrote:The case for an insane 2024 is starting to crack. La Nina coming later than originally thought, extreme SAL, temperatures not quite as off the charts as they were at the start of the season.
We had a Cat 4 in the MDR in June and a Cat 5 in the Caribbean in the first days of July. We've already had an insane season no matter how you look at it
It's a great example of why SSTs matter. Even if given the same atmospheric conditions, a regular SST configuration would have delayed the initial formation significantly. The peak intensity of Beryl would've been much lower, maybe up to Cat 2 or so. Finally, without the ample fuel and a very strong vortex to resist shear, Beryl quickly falls apart mid Carribean and glides into Central America as a wave.Category5Kaiju wrote:Hammy wrote:MEANINGLESS_NUMBERS wrote:The case for an insane 2024 is starting to crack. La Nina coming later than originally thought, extreme SAL, temperatures not quite as off the charts as they were at the start of the season.
We had a Cat 4 in the MDR in June and a Cat 5 in the Caribbean in the first days of July. We've already had an insane season no matter how you look at it
And adding to this, while Beryl is indeed a freak anomaly of a storm, I also see it as a consequence of the unusually favorable Atlantic conditions that many other years, with the exceptions of sinister years like 1933 and 2005, lacked. Under normal circumstances, we shouldn't have seen this kind of system. If this is not an indication of a year that may bring many powerful systems and be extremely active, then I don't really know what is.
Woofde wrote:It's a great example of why SSTs matter. Even if given the same atmospheric conditions, a regular SST configuration would have delayed the initial formation significantly. The peak intensity of Beryl would've been much lower, maybe up to Cat 2 or so. Finally, without the ample fuel and a very strong vortex to resist shear, Beryl quickly falls apart mid Carribean and glides into Central America as a wave.Category5Kaiju wrote:Hammy wrote:
We had a Cat 4 in the MDR in June and a Cat 5 in the Caribbean in the first days of July. We've already had an insane season no matter how you look at it
And adding to this, while Beryl is indeed a freak anomaly of a storm, I also see it as a consequence of the unusually favorable Atlantic conditions that many other years, with the exceptions of sinister years like 1933 and 2005, lacked. Under normal circumstances, we shouldn't have seen this kind of system. If this is not an indication of a year that may bring many powerful systems and be extremely active, then I don't really know what is.
toad strangler wrote:The recent CSU update stated that the reality of Beryl is very likely a harbinger of things to come peak season. Who here is just as or more qualified to dispute that? Also, when is the next NOAA update?
Users browsing this forum: Beef Stew, cycloneye, Google Adsense [Bot], pepecool20 and 40 guests