#135 Postby Hammy » Thu Sep 19, 2024 5:23 am
chaser1 wrote:Even if the remnants of Gordon were to develop (redevelop?) before the new disturbance to its west, are we sure it would even retain its prior "Gordon" name? The only reason that I question it is because I do not recall NHC guidance that applies to those circumstances that defines when post-decay tropical cyclones retain their old name, verses having a new name attributed to them
I am assuming it has more to do with how well has the remnant low been continously identifiable verses a post decay disturbance that completely decayed losing all identifiable circulation?
Lee in 2017 kept the name even though it could've arguably been considered a separate storm (it regenerated from the sheared-off mid-level circulation as it interacted with an upper low, hundreds of miles away, while the old LLC continued west), along with Mitch in 1998 and Ivan in 2004, so they'll probably retain it here if it can be tracked in some way back to the original Gordon disturbance.
2 likes
The above post is not official and should not be used as such. It is the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is not endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.