caneman wrote:Hypercane_Kyle wrote:caneman wrote:
It isn't hitting the panhandle, its hitting the big bend
I consider the Big Bend in the Panhandle, sorry not sorry
Facts are facts
Feeling are also facts?
Moderator: S2k Moderators
caneman wrote:Hypercane_Kyle wrote:caneman wrote:
It isn't hitting the panhandle, its hitting the big bend
I consider the Big Bend in the Panhandle, sorry not sorry
Facts are facts
sponger wrote:LandoWill wrote:Nimbus wrote:
At least its tracking back on the expected course if not intensity.
Still too early to tell if the trend will continue, but this is on the ADJUSTED 8am track. They adjusted it slightly at 8am without noting it - Here is radar with track
Wow!
InfernoFlameCat wrote:Pipelines182 wrote:Glad to wake up this AM to see Helene only modestly stronger and not going through RI like predicted. That bit of dry air absolutely wrecked the core and it seems the storm is still trying to sort that core out. With time running out, it may not be able to before landfall. Cat 5 is off the table, Cat 4 likely is as well, I'm still sticking to my prediction yesterday of a Strong 2 / Weak 3 at landfall.
I've already said this a hundred times but dry air in the core can not be modeled properly, once that happens it's rolling the dice on when it'll mix out, seems like we likely rolled in our favor this time.
It's already at a modest Cat 2 with 14 hours till land fall with a fully closed Eyewall. A strong cat 3 is still extremely plausible and Cat 4 is by no means to be written off. But at this point the storm is so large I doubt it will really matter if it is Cat 3 or 4.
Pipelines182 wrote:Kazmit wrote:Pipelines182 wrote:Glad to wake up this AM to see Helene only modestly stronger and not going through RI like predicted. That bit of dry air absolutely wrecked the core and it seems the storm is still trying to sort that core out. With time running out, it may not be able to before landfall. Cat 5 is off the table, Cat 4 likely is as well, I'm still sticking to my prediction yesterday of a Strong 2 / Weak 3 at landfall.
I've already said this a hundred times but dry air in the core can not be modeled properly, once that happens it's rolling the dice on when it'll mix out, seems like we likely rolled in our favor this time.
It's already a high-end cat 2 and it still has 12 hours.
It's a minimal cat 2 right now. Damage increases exponentially with wind speed, there is a very big difference in wind damage from a 3 to a 4, the size just makes that category difference even more important.
thickiminaj wrote::oops: Someone teach me what I’m doing wrong.
I just wanna show you guys this video but actually post the video not the link to it.
This is the link to the video I’ve been trying to post to show y’all Helene’s actual movement overlay on the NHC track to show east movement.
https://imgur.com/a/t7YiFfk
WaveBreaking wrote:https://i.imgur.com/kOrYrWr.gif
technikal wrote:sponger wrote:Texashawk wrote:
So much for the dry air issues. I think that ship has sailed
Yep she is ready to take off. I am still expecting strong Cat 3 at landfall unless that shear can get to her like we are seeing on some of the hurricane models. Stadium eye will be here soon and if that combines with a East shift at 11, all hell is going to break loose!
I don’t see a storm ready for RI. My bet is moderate strengthening kept and landfall as a low cat 3.
drewschmaltz wrote:So these NHC people are pretty good at the track these days, huh? I don't have any data on it. But, part of the fun here is the questioning of the forecast. Yeah, sometimes it's based on achey knees and -removed-. But, sometimes it's founded on some solid principles or data gathering. Back to my point - it seems that the NHC forecast is amazingly accurate these days. From the delayed naming of Helene to the east / west wobbles, NHC is dialed in. Keep questioning! But good luck being right lol.
tolakram wrote:Powellrm wrote:acidus wrote:
Joe Bastardi is predicting Cat 5.
https://x.com/BigJoeBastardi/status/1839070525273870548
Is there any data or modeling that would support such an assertion? Or is he trying to get clicks?
This is an older tweet and some of the earlier model runs shows a very intense system. We can't say what his motives are, only what he says.
thickiminaj wrote::oops: Someone teach me what I’m doing wrong.
I just wanna show you guys this video but actually post the video not the link to it.
This is the link to the video I’ve been trying to post to show y’all Helene’s actual movement overlay on the NHC track to show east movement.
https://imgur.com/a/t7YiFfk
Pipelines182 wrote:Kazmit wrote:Pipelines182 wrote:Glad to wake up this AM to see Helene only modestly stronger and not going through RI like predicted. That bit of dry air absolutely wrecked the core and it seems the storm is still trying to sort that core out. With time running out, it may not be able to before landfall. Cat 5 is off the table, Cat 4 likely is as well, I'm still sticking to my prediction yesterday of a Strong 2 / Weak 3 at landfall.
I've already said this a hundred times but dry air in the core can not be modeled properly, once that happens it's rolling the dice on when it'll mix out, seems like we likely rolled in our favor this time.
It's already a high-end cat 2 and it still has 12 hours.
It's a minimal cat 2 right now. Damage increases exponentially with wind speed, there is a very big difference in wind damage from a 3 to a 4, the size just makes that category difference even more important.
tolakram wrote:sponger wrote:InfernoFlameCat wrote:It's already at a modest Cat 2 with 14 hours till land fall with a fully closed Eyewall. A strong cat 3 is still extremely plausible and Cat 4 is by no means to be written off. But at this point the storm is so large I doubt it will really matter if it is Cat 3 or 4.
Exactly, except for a few people foolish enough not to evacuate. The impact on millions will be little changed. I can only imagine the power out numbers tomorrow. I am going to guess 6 million. Any other bets?
Was trying to explain this to my wife. Ike was not predicted and our area way up here experienced gusts to 70+mph which knocked out numerous trees and left a lot without power. If that happens again the number could be very high well away from landfall.
Steve wrote:thickiminaj wrote::oops: Someone teach me what I’m doing wrong.
I just wanna show you guys this video but actually post the video not the link to it.
This is the link to the video I’ve been trying to post to show y’all Helene’s actual movement overlay on the NHC track to show east movement.
https://imgur.com/a/t7YiFfk
You got it. It’s img /img to link a hosted photo or video. Pretty cool so thanks.
Teban54 wrote:Pipelines182 wrote:Kazmit wrote:It's already a high-end cat 2 and it still has 12 hours.
It's a minimal cat 2 right now. Damage increases exponentially with wind speed, there is a very big difference in wind damage from a 3 to a 4, the size just makes that category difference even more important.
The official intensity 2 hours ago was a minimal Cat 2, but the continued presence of 102 kt FL winds (over two recon passes) gives good arguments for a current intensity of 90 kt.
Also, what you're talking about is just wind damage, or damage from a small swath of wind in the "correct" quadrant of the eyewall. With a large storm like Helene, both the surge and extent of which strong (but necessarily peak) winds are spread out will cause far more effects, and those don't necessarily depend heavily on peak wind.
Woofde wrote:I have been talking amongst a lot of other chasers and people who do this for a living. It does seem that the sentiment on the ground is Cat 3. The storm is so big, not sure it's going to be able to rapidly intensify, we shall see, not ruled out yet. I'm still leaning on just west of Perry for the eye, that's where most of the models I trust are zoned in. That East jog could be a complication, though we need to see if it will stick. These just as often will jog back.
I think that's probably for the best lmao. Had the storm really come into Tallahasse, you couldn't pay me to go where Josh is. If something went wrong with that building, it would pretty much just be gameover for him with the surge.cycloneye wrote:He is still chasing for the best spot.
https://x.com/iCyclone/status/1839304666565456245
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest