NATL: HUMBERTO - Remnants - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
zhukm29
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 351
Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2018 2:37 pm

Re: NATL: HUMBERTO - Hurricane - Discussion

#281 Postby zhukm29 » Sat Sep 27, 2025 1:29 pm

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
Hurricane2022
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1750
Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2022 11:38 pm
Location: Araçatuba, Brazil

Re: NATL: HUMBERTO - Hurricane - Discussion

#282 Postby Hurricane2022 » Sat Sep 27, 2025 1:29 pm

cycloneye wrote:
AL, 08, 2025092718, , BEST, 0, 228N, 608W, 135, 926, HU

Yeah for sure this is Sam 2.0. I'm "sure" it's around 140 - 145 kt now.
6 likes   
Sorry for the bad English sometimes...!
For reliable and detailed information for any meteorological phenomenon, please consult the National Hurricane Center, Joint Typhoon Warning Center , or your local Meteo Center.

--------

Una cvm Christo, pro Christo, et in Christo. Sit nomen Domini benedictvm.

User avatar
aspen
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8917
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 7:10 pm
Location: Connecticut, USA

Re: NATL: HUMBERTO - Hurricane - Discussion

#283 Postby aspen » Sat Sep 27, 2025 1:33 pm

cycloneye wrote:
AL, 08, 2025092718, , BEST, 0, 228N, 608W, 135, 926, HU

Fingers crossed they go 5 kt higher for the official advisory like they did several times Thursday and Friday. Although they tend to do that earlier in a system’s life or during initial RI bursts.
3 likes   
Irene '11 Sandy '12 Hermine '16 5/15/2018 Derecho Fay '20 Isaias '20 Elsa '21 Henri '21 Ida '21

I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.

User avatar
Beef Stew
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 533
Joined: Sat May 30, 2020 11:31 am
Location: South Florida

Re: NATL: HUMBERTO - Hurricane - Discussion

#284 Postby Beef Stew » Sat Sep 27, 2025 1:35 pm

Wouldn’t be surprised if this is a 145+ kt storm right now. I’d say the satellite presentation looks even more impressive than Erin at her peak, and I don’t recall those eye temps being nearly this high, although I don’t remember for sure. Visually, it reminds me a lot of Irma. Operationally, it reminds me of Sam.
1 likes   

User avatar
WaveBreaking
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 627
Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2024 11:33 am
Location: US

Re: NATL: HUMBERTO - Hurricane - Discussion

#285 Postby WaveBreaking » Sat Sep 27, 2025 1:37 pm

Ngl I think Humberto is prettier than Erin was at its peak.

Image
Image
9 likes   
I am NOT a professional meteorologist, so take all of my posts with a grain of salt. My opinions are mine and mine alone.

User avatar
HurricaneAndre2008
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 353
Age: 28
Joined: Wed Jul 31, 2019 9:51 pm
Contact:

Re: NATL: HUMBERTO - Hurricane - Discussion

#286 Postby HurricaneAndre2008 » Sat Sep 27, 2025 1:38 pm

cycloneye wrote:
AL, 08, 2025092718, , BEST, 0, 228N, 608W, 135, 926, HU


I think that's a fake fix.
0 likes   
Cindy(2005), Katrina(2005), Rita(2005), Erin(2007), Isaac(2012)

Sciencerocks
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9781
Age: 39
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2017 1:51 am

Re: NATL: HUMBERTO - Hurricane - Discussion

#287 Postby Sciencerocks » Sat Sep 27, 2025 1:38 pm

Image
1 likes   

zhukm29
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 351
Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2018 2:37 pm

Re: NATL: HUMBERTO - Hurricane - Discussion

#288 Postby zhukm29 » Sat Sep 27, 2025 1:38 pm

Image
7 likes   

User avatar
HurricaneAndre2008
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 353
Age: 28
Joined: Wed Jul 31, 2019 9:51 pm
Contact:

Re: NATL: HUMBERTO - Hurricane - Discussion

#289 Postby HurricaneAndre2008 » Sat Sep 27, 2025 1:39 pm

TXNT23 KNES 271822
TCSNTL

A. 08L (HUMBERTO)

B. 27/1800Z

C. 22.7N

D. 60.7W

E. ONE/GOES-E

F. T6.5/6.5

G. IR/EIR/VIS

H. REMARKS...MWG EYE SURROUNDED BY W AND EMBEDDED IN B RESULTS IN A DT
OF 6.5. THE MET IS 6.5 BASED ON A RAPIDLY DEVELOPING 24 HOUR TREND. THE
PT IS 6.5. THE FT IS BASED ON THE DT.

I. ADDL POSITIONS

NIL


...MONAGHAN
1 likes   
Cindy(2005), Katrina(2005), Rita(2005), Erin(2007), Isaac(2012)

User avatar
Travorum
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 536
Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2023 9:36 am
Location: Dunedin, FL

Re: NATL: HUMBERTO - Hurricane - Discussion

#290 Postby Travorum » Sat Sep 27, 2025 1:40 pm

T6.5 fix from SAB, somehow that W ring wasn't thick enough.

TXNT23 KNES 271822
TCSNTL

A. 08L (HUMBERTO)

B. 27/1800Z

C. 22.7N

D. 60.7W

E. ONE/GOES-E

F. T6.5/6.5

G. IR/EIR/VIS

H. REMARKS...MWG EYE SURROUNDED BY W AND EMBEDDED IN B RESULTS IN A DT
OF 6.5. THE MET IS 6.5 BASED ON A RAPIDLY DEVELOPING 24 HOUR TREND. THE
PT IS 6.5. THE FT IS BASED ON THE DT.

I. ADDL POSITIONS

NIL


...MONAGHAN
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34127
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

Re: NATL: HUMBERTO - Hurricane - Discussion

#291 Postby CrazyC83 » Sat Sep 27, 2025 1:46 pm

It looks T7.0 to me, especially with a hint of CMG and a very warm eye. If the CMG can wrap around, that would be T7.5.

I'd probably even consider 145 kt (if they went there, the pressure would likely be about 918 mb).
Last edited by CrazyC83 on Sat Sep 27, 2025 1:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.
3 likes   

User avatar
sasha_B
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 196
Age: 24
Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2024 4:32 pm
Location: Charleston, SC

Re: NATL: HUMBERTO - Hurricane - Discussion

#292 Postby sasha_B » Sat Sep 27, 2025 1:47 pm

Eye temp is still over 20°C and there are no signs of deterioration / another EWRC at this point. It's possible that if the upward trend in objective estimates holds for a couple more hours, they'll have what they need to make the call at 21z. As a layperson, this seems at the very least close to Erin's presentation at her peak intensity, but I suppose it makes sense to be a little more conservative in the absence of recon data.
1 likes   

User avatar
Iceresistance
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9312
Age: 22
Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2020 9:45 am
Location: Tecumseh, OK/Norman, OK

Re: NATL: HUMBERTO - Hurricane - Discussion

#293 Postby Iceresistance » Sat Sep 27, 2025 1:48 pm

HurricaneAndre2008 wrote:
cycloneye wrote:
AL, 08, 2025092718, , BEST, 0, 228N, 608W, 135, 926, HU


I think that's a fake fix.


The real fix just came in
08L HUMBERTO 250927 1800 22.7N 60.7W ATL 135 929
1 likes   
Bill 2015 & Beta 2020

Winter 2020-2021 :cold:

All observations are in Tecumseh, OK unless otherwise noted.

Winter posts are focused mainly for Oklahoma & Texas.

Take any of my forecasts with a grain of salt, refer to the NWS, SPC, and NHC for official information

Never say Never with weather! Because ANYTHING is possible!

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34127
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

Re: NATL: HUMBERTO - Hurricane - Discussion

#294 Postby CrazyC83 » Sat Sep 27, 2025 1:48 pm

sasha_B wrote:Eye temp is still over 20°C and there are no signs of deterioration / another EWRC at this point. It's possible that if the upward trend in objective estimates holds for a couple more hours, they'll have what they need to make the call at 21z. As a layperson, this seems at the very least close to Erin's presentation at her peak intensity, but I suppose it makes sense to be a little more conservative in the absence of recon data.


It's very rare for NHC to upgrade to a cat 5 without Recon. I know they famously did for Lorenzo in 2019, but before then Isabel in 2003 was the last time they did.
8 likes   

User avatar
Kingarabian
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 16261
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 3:06 am
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii

Re: NATL: HUMBERTO - Hurricane - Discussion

#295 Postby Kingarabian » Sat Sep 27, 2025 1:50 pm

Travorum wrote:T6.5 fix from SAB, somehow that W ring wasn't thick enough.

TXNT23 KNES 271822
TCSNTL

A. 08L (HUMBERTO)

B. 27/1800Z

C. 22.7N

D. 60.7W

E. ONE/GOES-E

F. T6.5/6.5

G. IR/EIR/VIS

H. REMARKS...MWG EYE SURROUNDED BY W AND EMBEDDED IN B RESULTS IN A DT
OF 6.5. THE MET IS 6.5 BASED ON A RAPIDLY DEVELOPING 24 HOUR TREND. THE
PT IS 6.5. THE FT IS BASED ON THE DT.

I. ADDL POSITIONS

NIL


...MONAGHAN

Its tough in these situations because the thickness on the W ring has been fluctuating. A CMG ring can help it get a 7.0.

But IMO a T6.5 and a perfect microwave pass means this is a Cat.5.
Last edited by Kingarabian on Sat Sep 27, 2025 1:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.
4 likes   
RIP Kobe Bryant

User avatar
sasha_B
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 196
Age: 24
Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2024 4:32 pm
Location: Charleston, SC

Re: NATL: HUMBERTO - Hurricane - Discussion

#296 Postby sasha_B » Sat Sep 27, 2025 1:50 pm

An override to *increase* the central pressure estimate seems rather odd in this case. Perhaps the next full advisory will elaborate further on the factors that might be holding Humberto back.
2 likes   

User avatar
Travorum
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 536
Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2023 9:36 am
Location: Dunedin, FL

Re: NATL: HUMBERTO - Hurricane - Discussion

#297 Postby Travorum » Sat Sep 27, 2025 1:50 pm

CrazyC83 wrote:
sasha_B wrote:Eye temp is still over 20°C and there are no signs of deterioration / another EWRC at this point. It's possible that if the upward trend in objective estimates holds for a couple more hours, they'll have what they need to make the call at 21z. As a layperson, this seems at the very least close to Erin's presentation at her peak intensity, but I suppose it makes sense to be a little more conservative in the absence of recon data.


It's very rare for NHC to upgrade to a cat 5 without Recon. I know they famously did for Lorenzo in 2019, but before then Isabel in 2003 was the last time they did.


And Lorenzo had a research mission in it that IIRC verified that earlier Dvorak estimates matched the ground truth.
2 likes   

User avatar
HurricaneAndre2008
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 353
Age: 28
Joined: Wed Jul 31, 2019 9:51 pm
Contact:

Re: NATL: HUMBERTO - Hurricane - Discussion

#298 Postby HurricaneAndre2008 » Sat Sep 27, 2025 1:52 pm

AL, 08, 2025092718, , BEST, 0, 227N, 607W, 135, 929, HU, 64, NEQ, 20, 20, 20, 20, 1011, 170, 10, 0, 0, L, 0, , 0, 0, HUMBERTO, D, 0, , 0, 0, 0, 0, genesis-num, 025
0 likes   
Cindy(2005), Katrina(2005), Rita(2005), Erin(2007), Isaac(2012)

zhukm29
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 351
Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2018 2:37 pm

Re: NATL: HUMBERTO - Hurricane - Discussion

#299 Postby zhukm29 » Sat Sep 27, 2025 1:53 pm

Insane microwave images for Humberto:

Image
Image
Image
6 likes   

User avatar
StormWeather
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 442
Joined: Wed Jun 05, 2024 2:34 pm

Re: NATL: HUMBERTO - Hurricane - Discussion

#300 Postby StormWeather » Sat Sep 27, 2025 1:54 pm

The Raw T# numbers are almost at Category 5 level

Analysis



UW - CIMSS
ADVANCED DVORAK TECHNIQUE
ADT-Version 9.1
Tropical Cyclone Intensity Algorithm

----- Current Analysis -----
Date : 27 SEP 2025 Time : 181019 UTC
Lat : 22:40:48 N Lon : 60:43:47 W


CI# /Pressure/ Vmax
6.6 / 933.3mb/129.6kt


Final T# Adj T# Raw T#
6.6 6.8 6.8

Estimated radius of max. wind based on IR : 16 km

Center Temp : +19.2C Cloud Region Temp : -70.9C

Scene Type : EYE
4 likes   
Just an average cyclone tracker

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products


Return to “2025”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 38 guests