NATL: KAREN - Post-Tropical - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
chaser1
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5656
Age: 64
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 5:59 pm
Location: Longwood, Fl

Re: NATL: INVEST 96L - Discussion (40/40): Update - STWO issued at 635 PM

#21 Postby chaser1 » Thu Oct 09, 2025 6:16 pm

I hate myself for buying into to the idea of 96L being tagged as a TD or TS but........ if it is - IT IS. This this has the prerequisite features that would define a T.D. (or stronger). I don't know what the hell the SST's are up there, but i'm willing to give it it's due. If the T #'s are there - name it.
0 likes   
Andy D

(For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.)

User avatar
tropicwatch
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3419
Age: 61
Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2007 10:01 am
Location: Panama City Florida
Contact:

Re: NATL: INVEST 96L - Discussion (40/40): Update - STWO issued at 635 PM

#22 Postby tropicwatch » Thu Oct 09, 2025 6:22 pm

chaser1 wrote:I hate myself for buying into to the idea of 96L being tagged as a TD or TS but........ if it is - IT IS. This this has the prerequisite features that would define a T.D. (or stronger). I don't know what the hell the SST's are up there, but i'm willing to give it it's due. If the T #'s are there - name it.

Not very warm i would guess.. Closest buoy about 800 miles to its northeast reporting 60 and about 1100 miles to its east 62.
0 likes   
Tropicwatch


Agnes 72', Eloise 75, Elena 85', Kate 85', Charley 86', Florence 88', Beryl 94', Dean 95', Erin 95', Opal 95', Earl 98', Georges 98', Ivan 2004', Arlene 2005', Dennis 2005', Ida 2009' Debby 2012' Irma 2017' Michael 2018'

LarryWx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6744
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2003 2:04 pm
Location: GA

Re: NATL: INVEST 96L - Discussion (40/40): Update - STWO issued at 635 PM

#23 Postby LarryWx » Thu Oct 09, 2025 6:33 pm

Europa non è lontana wrote:
TallyTracker wrote:I find it odd that the NHC would potentially initiate advisories on a system that is near 45N even if it has tropical characteristics. I would think being at least at in or near the subtropics would be part of the criteria.


To paraphrase Dr Knabb — if it looks like a subtropical storm, it probably is, despite its environment and unusual location. Anyway, the NHC's area of responsibility extends throughout the entire North Atlantic basin, as far as I'm aware.


Folks, As weird as this season has been, it may get weirder!
A look just now at historical genesis locations on record tells me that 96L, already way up near 44.5N, would easily become the furthest N genesis for either a TC or STC as the furthest N on record is 42N (unnamed storm in 1952)!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1952_Atla ... Storm_Five

https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/data/tracks/tracks-at-1952.png
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Europa non è lontana
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 113
Joined: Wed Nov 11, 2020 10:01 pm

Re: NATL: INVEST 96L - Discussion (40/40): Update - STWO issued at 635 PM

#24 Postby Europa non è lontana » Thu Oct 09, 2025 6:34 pm

chaser1 wrote:I don't know what the hell the SST's are up there, but i'm willing to give it it's due. If the T #'s are there - name it.


20°C at the moment, which is very marginal, but Pablo in 2019 managed to become a hurricane with similar SSTs.
0 likes   

User avatar
JetFuel_SE
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 286
Age: 26
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2020 3:57 pm

Re: NATL: INVEST 96L - Discussion (40/40): Update - STWO issued at 635 PM

#25 Postby JetFuel_SE » Thu Oct 09, 2025 6:39 pm

Europa non è lontana wrote:
chaser1 wrote:I don't know what the hell the SST's are up there, but i'm willing to give it it's due. If the T #'s are there - name it.


20°C at the moment, which is very marginal, but Pablo in 2019 managed to become a hurricane with similar SSTs.


I believe Arlene 2017 formed over even colder SSTs.
0 likes   

Sciencerocks
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9781
Age: 39
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2017 1:51 am

Re: NATL: INVEST 96L - Discussion (40/40): Update - STWO issued at 635 PM

#26 Postby Sciencerocks » Thu Oct 09, 2025 6:52 pm

Image

I'd estimate 55 knts and certainly the better looking of the Atlantic systems!
4 likes   

User avatar
Europa non è lontana
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 113
Joined: Wed Nov 11, 2020 10:01 pm

Re: NATL: INVEST 96L - Discussion (60/60)

#27 Postby Europa non è lontana » Thu Oct 09, 2025 6:55 pm

60/60

North Atlantic (AL96):
Showers and thunderstorms continue to show signs of organization
with a small gale-force area of low pressure located several hundred
miles to the northwest of the Azores. Only a small increase in
organization could result in the formation of a subtropical
or tropical storm as soon as tonight, as the system moves slowly
northwestward. Over the weekend, the system is expected to move
over cooler waters, ending its chances of further development. For
more information on this system, including gale warnings, see High
Seas Forecasts issued by the National Weather Service and Meteo
France.
* Formation chance through 48 hours...medium...60 percent.
* Formation chance through 7 days...medium...60 percent.
0 likes   

LarryWx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6744
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2003 2:04 pm
Location: GA

Re: NATL: INVEST 96L - Discussion (60/60)

#28 Postby LarryWx » Thu Oct 09, 2025 7:06 pm

Instead of complaining to the manager, Karen complained to forecaster Papin because she insisted on this storm being named for her so she can be almost guaranteed a return in 2031 to bother us yet again. :lol:
6 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

Sciencerocks
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9781
Age: 39
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2017 1:51 am

Re: NATL: INVEST 96L - Discussion (60/60)

#29 Postby Sciencerocks » Thu Oct 09, 2025 7:07 pm

Should have gone 100% for that one. ;) It is a certainty. This thing would have to be decoupled in the next 2.5 hours to not be deserving.
7 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 147741
Age: 69
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: NATL: INVEST 96L - Discussion (60/60)

#30 Postby cycloneye » Thu Oct 09, 2025 8:14 pm

Dvorak at 3.0. :D

A. TROPICAL DISTURBANCE (96L)

B. 10/0000Z

C. 44.4N

D. 33.3W

E. THREE/GOES-E

F. T3.0/3.0

G. IR/EIR/PRXY

H. REMARKS...6.5/10 BANDING RESULTS IN A DT OF 3.0. SYSTEM HAS
TRANSITIONED TO MORE TROPICAL STATUS. MDTLY COLD CONVECTIVE TOPS TO -52
C. MET AND PT N/A. FT BASED ON DT.


I. ADDL POSITIONS

NIL


...KONON
1 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
StormWeather
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 442
Joined: Wed Jun 05, 2024 2:34 pm

Re: NATL: INVEST 96L - Discussion (60/60)

#31 Postby StormWeather » Thu Oct 09, 2025 8:16 pm

cycloneye wrote:Dvorak at 3.0. :D

A. TROPICAL DISTURBANCE (96L)

B. 10/0000Z

C. 44.4N

D. 33.3W

E. THREE/GOES-E

F. T3.0/3.0

G. IR/EIR/PRXY

H. REMARKS...6.5/10 BANDING RESULTS IN A DT OF 3.0. SYSTEM HAS
TRANSITIONED TO MORE TROPICAL STATUS. MDTLY COLD CONVECTIVE TOPS TO -52
C. MET AND PT N/A. FT BASED ON DT.


I. ADDL POSITIONS

NIL


...KONON

Is this thing gunning to become an unexpected hurricane as well?!
2 likes   
Just an average cyclone tracker

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

Subtrop
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 702
Joined: Sun Feb 21, 2021 9:45 pm

Re: NATL: KAREN - Subtropical Storm - Discussion

#32 Postby Subtrop » Thu Oct 09, 2025 9:43 pm

AL, 11, 2025101000, , BEST, 0, 444N, 334W, 40, 998, SS, 34, NEQ, 20, 50, 50, 30, 1012, 190, 20, 55, 0, L, 0, , 0, 0, KAREN, S, 0, , 0, 0, 0, 0, genesis-num, 033, TRANSITIONED, alB62025 to al112025,
7 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34127
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

Re: NATL: Karen - Subtropical Storm - Discussion

#33 Postby CrazyC83 » Thu Oct 09, 2025 9:55 pm

Even though, most likely in the ultimate track, genesis will be moved upwards (maybe to this morning), genesis would still be north of 40°N. But operationally this is so far north...about the same latitude as Burlington, VT or Halifax, NS.

I would also take the sub off of it - I would give it a full tropical classification. It doesn't look to be embedded in any upper level system and it has a small RMW.
3 likes   

User avatar
AJC3
Admin
Admin
Posts: 4105
Age: 61
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 7:04 pm
Location: Ballston Spa, New York
Contact:

Re: NATL: Karen - Subtropical Storm - Discussion

#34 Postby AJC3 » Fri Oct 10, 2025 12:52 am

CrazyC83 wrote:Even though, most likely in the ultimate track, genesis will be moved upwards (maybe to this morning), genesis would still be north of 40°N. But operationally this is so far north...about the same latitude as Burlington, VT or Halifax, NS.

I would also take the sub off of it - I would give it a full tropical classification. It doesn't look to be embedded in any upper level system and it has a small RMW.


Phil did a great job explaining his rationale for the STS designation, which I totally agree with. It's hard to justify this being "fully tropical" given the low was baroclinically initiated beneath a mid to upper level low which is still located over the top of it. While the RMW did shrink as you mentioned, the convective top temperatures, supported by that cold core low (and needed given the low SSTs), aren't all that cold, as Phil mentioned. That's not surprising for a system this far north. More often than not, these high-latitude ST systems wind up decaying by their own hand - the latent heat release from the convection being generated warms the air aloft, in turn weakening the cold low aloft and the associated temperature lapse rates needed to maintain the convection. SSTs would need to warm along its path to compensate for this, which isn't usually the case (and not here either).

In any event, as you well know, cyclone structure/phase lies along a spectrum. Categorization is sometimes difficult, to a large degree subjective, and usually generates a lot of dicussion. It's no different with Karen, on S2K and elsewhere.
3 likes   

User avatar
Vince_and_Grace_fan
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 320
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2016 9:25 am
Location: Szombathely (Hungary)

Re: NATL: KAREN - Subtropical Storm - Discussion

#35 Postby Vince_and_Grace_fan » Fri Oct 10, 2025 2:34 am

Here is a satellite animation from yesterday afternoon/evening (from my new X site).

 https://x.com/Zivipotty/status/1976550495549591654

2 likes   

User avatar
Europa non è lontana
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 113
Joined: Wed Nov 11, 2020 10:01 pm

Re: NATL: KAREN - Subtropical Storm - Discussion

#36 Postby Europa non è lontana » Fri Oct 10, 2025 8:40 am

Image

Still going strong over 18-19°C SSTs!
6 likes   

Sciencerocks
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9781
Age: 39
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2017 1:51 am

Re: NATL: KAREN - Subtropical Storm - Discussion

#37 Postby Sciencerocks » Fri Oct 10, 2025 3:04 pm

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
Europa non è lontana
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 113
Joined: Wed Nov 11, 2020 10:01 pm

Re: NATL: KAREN - Post-Tropical - Discussion

#38 Postby Europa non è lontana » Fri Oct 10, 2025 4:16 pm

I'd hazard a guess that formation time will be pushed back around 6-12 hours, but a recordbreaker either way.
1 likes   

Sciencerocks
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9781
Age: 39
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2017 1:51 am

Re: NATL: KAREN - Post-Tropical - Discussion

#39 Postby Sciencerocks » Fri Oct 10, 2025 5:14 pm

Probably closer to 18 hours. This thing looked good the next before. ;) I also think it peaked at 55 knts yesterday.
1 likes   

User avatar
AnnularCane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2934
Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2006 9:18 am
Location: Wytheville, VA

Re: NATL: KAREN - Post-Tropical - Discussion

#40 Postby AnnularCane » Fri Oct 10, 2025 6:56 pm

I'm wondering just how much we miss with some of these storms. :(
1 likes   
"But it never rained rain. It never snowed snow. And it never blew just wind. It rained things like soup and juice. It snowed mashed potatoes and green peas. And sometimes the wind blew in storms of hamburgers." -- Judi Barrett, Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs


Return to “2025”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 40 guests