Devastating for Jamaica regardless of course
NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Moderators: hurricanetrack, S2k Moderators

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Based off that latest pass, the hints of a double wind max seem to have all but gone (slight one in the SE perhaps) so whatever eyewall process happened should be done or almost done. Will be interesting to see how satellite changes. I have to say she has a long way to go for cat 5 wind speed wise…
Devastating for Jamaica regardless of course
Devastating for Jamaica regardless of course
1 likes
- AtlanticWind
- S2K Supporter

- Posts: 1897
- Age: 67
- Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 9:57 pm
- Location: Plantation,Fla
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
hipshot wrote:Tekken_Guy wrote:hipshot wrote:
I'm still concerned about that trough catching Melissa and pulling it NE. If it doesn't, we have a huge problem!
What exactly are you referring to?
As I understand it, there is a trough coming through to the north that will pull Melissa north, up through Jamaica, eastern Cuba and
then the Bahamas and that should happen in about 36 hours our so from now. If Melissa continues south and then to the west, it might
not be able to get the pull they are all talking about. I'm just a weather nerd but I get concerned when we have this kind of storm
moving towards the gulf.
There is really no concern that a slight dip SW will make any difference in
The turn to the N and NE that will occur tomorrow
2 likes
-
IsabelaWeather
- Category 1

- Posts: 313
- Age: 36
- Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2020 7:29 am
- Location: Isabela, Puerto Rico
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
hipshot wrote:IsabelaWeather wrote:Travorum wrote:There's definitely a notable wobble to the SW, the latest VDM fixed Melissa at 16.3N when the official track never drops below 16.4N. Obviously its very difficult to predict future trochoidal wobbles but this SW motion is significant and persistent enough that you have to wonder if it will have long term impacts on the future track.
NHC specifically said in one of their discussions that a SW movement was probable, but opted to show a due west movement because the SW movement wouldnt likely be sustained.
I'm still concerned about that trough catching Melissa and pulling it NE. If it doesn't, we have a huge problem!
Im not sure what youre worried about, there is pretty much zero threat to the CONUS. Even if it somehow hit, it would only be extreme south florida, but again, that is almost assured to not happen. It also wouldnt be the storm we have now, its almost november, the CONUS threat is pretty much closed. And any storm would be sheared like crazy.
1 likes
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Ubuntwo wrote:aspen wrote:This is the most Cat 5-looking non-Cat 5 I’ve ever seen lol. You’d think it’s like 10 mb deeper than it actually is. Really curious as to why it exhibits the classic Cat 5 structural hallmarks despite falling short in actual intensity. This could also have implications for some of the upper-end Cat 4s with speculated Cat 5 status.
It makes sense here - this is the Caribbean in late season. Dvorak is overreliant on convective depth, so a high tropopause can cause overestimates in intensity. Eta's a great extreme example. This is the same reason open Atlantic 130kt+ systems (Sam, Fiona, Jose, Kirk etc) struggle so hard to hit T7.0. I think we've come to recognize here that eye warmth, roundness, and stability plus CDO smoothness are better indicators of extreme intensity. Melissa did briefly have a near-perfect eye, but its CDO has yet to transition past the bursting phase, at least consistently.
CDO temperature isn’t the main thing sticking out to me about Melissa, though. For a few hours it had among the most symmetrical and robust CDOs I’ve seen in the Atlantic, comparable to or even a little better than Sam. Even if you were to try and correct the cloud temperatures to something from outside the Caribbean, you’d probably still have a W ring on Dvorak (again, like Sam). ~20C eye temps also put it among the Atlantic’s best in recent years.
I agree with you about the CDO bursting/inconsistency, though I’m curious as to why it’s remained even as the system matures and deepens. It may also indicate that some of the Cat 4 EPac systems which have been suspected to be 130-140 kt — Douglas, Darby, Dora, Gilma, etc — may have also been a tad weaker than our typical assessments of eye temperature and CDO smoothness have suggested. Or maybe this is just a weird outlier lol.
2 likes
Irene '11 Sandy '12 Hermine '16 5/15/2018 Derecho Fay '20 Isaias '20 Elsa '21 Henri '21 Ida '21
I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.
I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Is there something with Melissa's eye that makes the NOAA aircraft keep missing it, or is it just a streak of bad luck? This time, extrapolated pressure bottomed out at 934.0 mb with 39 kt FL winds. I don't even know if they did an eye drop at all; current data looks like they have skipped it.
Peak FL winds of 124 kt in both SE and NW quads remain unimpressive relative to the appearance, though not atypical of storms that just went through an EWRC (or similar).
Regardless, Melissa still found a way to look more impressive on IR. Whether that translates to intensification is anyone's guess.

Peak FL winds of 124 kt in both SE and NW quads remain unimpressive relative to the appearance, though not atypical of storms that just went through an EWRC (or similar).
Regardless, Melissa still found a way to look more impressive on IR. Whether that translates to intensification is anyone's guess.

3 likes
-
Hurricane Mike
- Category 2

- Posts: 663
- Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2018 7:44 am
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
What a monster. Looks like it might do an ERC in the next 12 hrs or so. Not good, because then the wind field will expand further.
0 likes
- ElectricStorm
- Category 5

- Posts: 5117
- Age: 24
- Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2019 11:23 pm
- Location: Skiatook, OK / Norman, OK
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Eye drop 938/28, supports 935mb so rose slightly from last pass
0 likes
B.S Meteorology, University of Oklahoma '25
Please refer to the NHC, NWS, or SPC for official information.
Please refer to the NHC, NWS, or SPC for official information.
- ScottNAtlanta
- Category 5

- Posts: 2507
- Joined: Sat May 25, 2013 3:11 pm
- Location: Atlanta, GA
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
ElectricStorm wrote:Eye drop 938/28, supports 935mb so rose slightly from last pass
That would translate down to 935, so more or less steady. The other 2 passes were 937/936 but they missed a little both times
1 likes
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Eye is contracting again, down to 12nm (from the 15nm on the previous pass just after the presumed eyewall meld):
F. CLOSED
G. C12
G. C12
2 likes
- cycloneye
- Admin

- Posts: 148154
- Age: 69
- Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
- Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Let's see if the next overnight mission has winds up and the pressure down. Air Force plane departs at 11:15 PM EDT.
4 likes
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Teban54 wrote:Is there something with Melissa's eye that makes the NOAA aircraft keep missing it, or is it just a streak of bad luck? This time, extrapolated pressure bottomed out at 934.0 mb with 39 kt FL winds. I don't even know if they did an eye drop at all; current data looks like they have skipped it.
Peak FL winds of 124 kt in both SE and NW quads remain unimpressive relative to the appearance, though not atypical of storms that just went through an EWRC (or similar).
Regardless, Melissa still found a way to look more impressive on IR. Whether that translates to intensification is anyone's guess.
https://i.imgur.com/8My44S5.gif
That is one scary hurricane.
1 likes
- cheezyWXguy
- Category 5

- Posts: 6211
- Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 12:29 am
- Location: Dallas, TX
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
I still think the reason why Melissa is exhibiting a bursting cdo is because the eyewall cycle isn’t fully completed yet. The double wind maximum is still there, but it’s not where I think many of you are looking for it in the recon data. Remember from earlier, on Jamaica radar we saw that the outer eyewall is not much larger than the inner, and the moat between them is very narrow. Therefore when looking at the graph of FL winds, you it won’t be at the “base of the mountain” so to speak, it will be at the peak. Note the double peak you see on FL winds at 00:34z and just after 01:34z:


1 likes
- Hurricane2022
- Category 5

- Posts: 1826
- Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2022 11:38 pm
- Location: Araçatuba, Brazil
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
HELL HOW this is NOT a C5???


7 likes
Sorry for the bad English sometimes...!
For reliable and detailed information for any meteorological phenomenon, please consult the National Hurricane Center, Joint Typhoon Warning Center , or your local Meteo Center.
--------
ECCE OMNIA NOVA FACIAM (Ap 21,5).
For reliable and detailed information for any meteorological phenomenon, please consult the National Hurricane Center, Joint Typhoon Warning Center , or your local Meteo Center.
--------
ECCE OMNIA NOVA FACIAM (Ap 21,5).
- cycloneye
- Admin

- Posts: 148154
- Age: 69
- Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
- Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
We will find out in the overnight hours when AF plane makes the passes, but one thing that will help her will be the DMAX period.
3 likes
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here
- Hurricane2022
- Category 5

- Posts: 1826
- Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2022 11:38 pm
- Location: Araçatuba, Brazil
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Oh


4 likes
Sorry for the bad English sometimes...!
For reliable and detailed information for any meteorological phenomenon, please consult the National Hurricane Center, Joint Typhoon Warning Center , or your local Meteo Center.
--------
ECCE OMNIA NOVA FACIAM (Ap 21,5).
For reliable and detailed information for any meteorological phenomenon, please consult the National Hurricane Center, Joint Typhoon Warning Center , or your local Meteo Center.
--------
ECCE OMNIA NOVA FACIAM (Ap 21,5).
- cheezyWXguy
- Category 5

- Posts: 6211
- Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 12:29 am
- Location: Dallas, TX
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
cycloneye wrote:
We will find out in the overnight hours when AF plane makes the passes, but one thing that will help her will be the DMAX period.
The ring of -80c cloud tops is now almost fully complete. If this trend continues and there are still no signs of intensification by the time the next recon pass is made, my theory goes out the window. I do think we will see a stronger storm by then though.
1 likes
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
ADT instantaneous estimate just jumped to T7.8 - that's the highest that's been seen in the Atlantic since Milton. Final ADT CI is now 7.3. Lightning is rotating around the eyewall and the cloud tops in the CDO are rapidly cooling. I concur with the sentiments being expressed by many others here (and, incidentally, mentioned in the NHC's 03z discussion) - Hurricane Melissa's satellite appearance would "suggest a higher intensity than found by the aircraft thus far."
2 likes
- mrbagyo
- Category 5

- Posts: 3846
- Age: 33
- Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2012 9:18 am
- Location: 14.13N 120.98E
- Contact:
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

This latest CDO burst expansion appears to be the most symmetrical so far.
3 likes
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to RSMC, NHC and NWS products.
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Hopefully, of course, it never gets to cat 5 as Jamaica can use any little bit of help it can get!
3 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
- Hurricane2022
- Category 5

- Posts: 1826
- Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2022 11:38 pm
- Location: Araçatuba, Brazil
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
https://x.com/PettusWX/status/1982640785553043803
https://x.com/weatherffolkes/status/1982639783030698217
https://x.com/weatherffolkes/status/1982639783030698217
0 likes
Sorry for the bad English sometimes...!
For reliable and detailed information for any meteorological phenomenon, please consult the National Hurricane Center, Joint Typhoon Warning Center , or your local Meteo Center.
--------
ECCE OMNIA NOVA FACIAM (Ap 21,5).
For reliable and detailed information for any meteorological phenomenon, please consult the National Hurricane Center, Joint Typhoon Warning Center , or your local Meteo Center.
--------
ECCE OMNIA NOVA FACIAM (Ap 21,5).
Return to “Active Storms/Invests - Atlantic/EastPAC/CentralPAC/MED”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Teban54 and 139 guests








