NATL: MELISSA - Aftermath - Discussion: Josh Morgerman video of Melissa is up
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Eye temp continues to drop. It's been dropping since 18z.
0 likes
- Hurricane2022
- Category 5

- Posts: 1958
- Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2022 11:38 pm
- Location: Araçatuba, Brazil
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
2 likes
Sorry for the bad English sometimes...!
For reliable and detailed information for any meteorological phenomenon, please consult the National Hurricane Center, Joint Typhoon Warning Center , or your local Meteo Center.
--------
ECCE OMNIA NOVA FACIAM (Ap 21,5).
For reliable and detailed information for any meteorological phenomenon, please consult the National Hurricane Center, Joint Typhoon Warning Center , or your local Meteo Center.
--------
ECCE OMNIA NOVA FACIAM (Ap 21,5).
- storm_in_a_teacup
- Category 1

- Posts: 494
- Age: 33
- Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2017 5:01 pm
- Location: Huntsville, Alabama (originally from Houston)
- Contact:
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Beef Stew wrote:eastcoastFL wrote:Still a very compact wind field and a very powerful tiny storm overall.
She’s a Caribbean Milton.
The width of her eye is similar to what I remember reading about the size of the Labor Day hurricane’s eye. Wonder how they compare size-wise
2 likes
I know I can't straddle the atmosphere...just a tiny storm in your teacup, girl.
- cheezyWXguy
- Category 5

- Posts: 6242
- Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 12:29 am
- Location: Dallas, TX
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
At first I thought the slight weakening might be due to another meld ongoing, but I’m not seeing any evidence of that. So now I’m wondering if it might be due to the increasing influence from the trough to the west trying to put a hard stop on its westward progress. I do recall the hafs earlier showing some slight weakening around this time, followed by a rebound after northward movement commenced and the storm motion aligns with the new mean flow. I’d be very happy if no rebound did occur, but I am curious if this is what we are seeing.
2 likes
- WaveBreaking
- Category 2

- Posts: 709
- Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2024 11:33 am
- Location: US
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Now almost completely stationary on meso.


5 likes
I am NOT a professional meteorologist, so take all of my posts with a grain of salt. My opinions are mine and mine alone.
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
cheezyWXguy wrote:At first I thought the slight weakening might be due to another meld ongoing, but I’m not seeing any evidence of that. So now I’m wondering if it might be due to the increasing influence from the trough to the west trying to put a hard stop on its westward progress. I do recall the hafs earlier showing some slight weakening around this time, followed by a rebound after northward movement commenced and the storm motion aligns with the new mean flow. I’d be very happy if no rebound did occur, but I am curious if this is what we are seeing.
That’s an interesting theory, could very well be right. The HAFS and other hi-res models are capable of picking out such fine details, remarkably. Let’s see!
0 likes
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
cheezyWXguy wrote:At first I thought the slight weakening might be due to another meld ongoing, but I’m not seeing any evidence of that. So now I’m wondering if it might be due to the increasing influence from the trough to the west trying to put a hard stop on its westward progress. I do recall the hafs earlier showing some slight weakening around this time, followed by a rebound after northward movement commenced and the storm motion aligns with the new mean flow. I’d be very happy if no rebound did occur, but I am curious if this is what we are seeing.
I was thinking the same thing about the trough, although the slight weakening on the HAFS runs also seemed to be due to an eyewall meld.
0 likes
Irene '11 Sandy '12 Hermine '16 5/15/2018 Derecho Fay '20 Isaias '20 Elsa '21 Henri '21 Ida '21
I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.
I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.
- Hurricane2022
- Category 5

- Posts: 1958
- Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2022 11:38 pm
- Location: Araçatuba, Brazil
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

4 likes
Sorry for the bad English sometimes...!
For reliable and detailed information for any meteorological phenomenon, please consult the National Hurricane Center, Joint Typhoon Warning Center , or your local Meteo Center.
--------
ECCE OMNIA NOVA FACIAM (Ap 21,5).
For reliable and detailed information for any meteorological phenomenon, please consult the National Hurricane Center, Joint Typhoon Warning Center , or your local Meteo Center.
--------
ECCE OMNIA NOVA FACIAM (Ap 21,5).
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
I think everybody is overreacting to a steady state storm
4 likes
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Zonacane wrote:I think everybody is overreacting to a steady state storm
I would agree with you if not for the pretty significant drop in FL winds from the last pass, though. (I know that I could eat crow at any minute with the next pass on the way.)
3 likes
TC naming lists: retirements and intensity
Most aggressive Advisory #1's in North Atlantic (cr. kevin for starting the list)
Most aggressive Advisory #1's in North Atlantic (cr. kevin for starting the list)
- TeamPlayersBlue
- Category 5

- Posts: 3473
- Joined: Tue Feb 02, 2010 1:44 am
- Location: Denver/Applewood, CO
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Going into the night time, storm may strengthen more. Many of you seem disappointed in the storm "stalling." The pressure is at 910 mb. Some crazy cold tops. The amount of lightning around the center for this long is more than I think I've seen. This is still an incredible storm and deserves its flowers.
I'm thinking it ramps up again in a few hours. Possibly start expanding the wind field just before landfall.
I'm thinking it ramps up again in a few hours. Possibly start expanding the wind field just before landfall.
5 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
zzzh wrote:150kt FL in NE
This batch is cut off exactly at the 150 kt FL from what I can see, so it's possible for higher winds to be reported later.
Edit: Also, still no double wind maxima until this 150 kt.
4 likes
TC naming lists: retirements and intensity
Most aggressive Advisory #1's in North Atlantic (cr. kevin for starting the list)
Most aggressive Advisory #1's in North Atlantic (cr. kevin for starting the list)
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
AF pass: 156 kt FL in the SW quad, and 909.6 mb extrap. Seems to be intensifying again compared to the first pass (if only slightly), pending dropsonade.
Edit: NOAA pass was at almost the same time (and the same angle). 152 kt FL in the NE quad, 910.2 mb extrap. Hasn't reached peak winds to the SW yet.
Edit: NOAA pass was at almost the same time (and the same angle). 152 kt FL in the NE quad, 910.2 mb extrap. Hasn't reached peak winds to the SW yet.
Last edited by Teban54 on Mon Oct 27, 2025 6:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.
1 likes
TC naming lists: retirements and intensity
Most aggressive Advisory #1's in North Atlantic (cr. kevin for starting the list)
Most aggressive Advisory #1's in North Atlantic (cr. kevin for starting the list)
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
910.2mb extrap on NOAA, 909.6mb extrap on AF. 156kt FL winds on the AF plane and for what its worth 164kt SFMR, both in the SW quad.
2 likes
- WaveBreaking
- Category 2

- Posts: 709
- Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2024 11:33 am
- Location: US
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
158kt FL
909.6mbar extrap MSLP @ 16kt
909.6mbar extrap MSLP @ 16kt
2 likes
I am NOT a professional meteorologist, so take all of my posts with a grain of salt. My opinions are mine and mine alone.
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Teban54 wrote:zzzh wrote:150kt FL in NE
This batch is cut off exactly at the 150 kt FL from what I can see, so it's possible for higher winds to be reported later.
Edit: Also, still no double wind maxima until this 150 kt.
Is tropical tidbits getting overloaded, I got a few gateway errors and no update?
Oh there it is 909.6
Last edited by Nimbus on Mon Oct 27, 2025 7:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests







