Question about that Kelvin (sp?) wave

Winter Weather Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
weatherlover427

Question about that Kelvin (sp?) wave

#1 Postby weatherlover427 » Sun Jan 04, 2004 4:39 pm

What are the implications of this big Kelvin (sp?) wave on the weather for the southwestern US this year? :-? :?: If it's too early to tell I understand.
0 likes   

User avatar
FLguy
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 799
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2003 5:36 pm
Location: Daytona Beach FL
Contact:

#2 Postby FLguy » Sun Jan 04, 2004 5:14 pm

Joshua21Young wrote:What are the implications of this big Kelvin (sp?) wave on the weather for the southwestern US this year? :-? :?: If it's too early to tell I understand.


it depends on where the areas of enhanced and spressed convection are located which relate best to where the heaviest precipitation is likely to occur along the west coast.

though that said the strongest correlation between the MJO and heavy precipitation is across the pacific northeast (which ties the ENSO phase into MJO activity...where El Nino events see LESS in the way of MJO activity corresponding to less precipitation across the pacific northwest during those periods...and enhanced precipitation in la nina winters where the PAC jet is more variable and MJO activity more prevalent).

Normally prior to significant precipitation events...the heaviest convection related to the MJO is located back across indonesia (~120E) and supressed convection over the indian ocean and the central pacific.

this is shown well by areas of above and below normal anomalous OLR (outgoing Longwave radiation) shown in the figure below:

Image

notice the area of above normal OLR anomalies across the indian ocean indicative of supressed convection with below normal OLR anomalies further east corresponsing to increrased convection. this set-up observed currently is most favorable for a heavy precipitation event in the PAC northwest as compared to areas further south. though even now as the waves of increased and decreased convection shift around...we are losing that correlation as well.

the area of increased convection would have to be located between roughly 160E and 170E for the correspondence between the MJO and a major precipitation event across the southwest US to be the strongest. even what that said as i talked about previously the connection between MJO activity and heavy precipitation events is LESS the further south along the west coast one goes.

Just recently a STRONG kelvin wave has moved eastward out of indonesia and is heading east across the equatorial pacific which is associated with enhanced convection...shown in the figure below:

Image

Notice the location of the wave is near 180 (the dateline) which as it continues east would be more favorable for heavy precipitation across the southwest. Even given the decreased connection.

suffice to say that the further east the area of convection associated with the MJO is located the better the potential for heavy precipitation events across the southwest USA is.
0 likes   

weatherlover427

#3 Postby weatherlover427 » Sun Jan 04, 2004 6:11 pm

So if it's already at the dateline (approx.) then when might we see its effects here in the west; then spreading throughout the rest of the US?
0 likes   

User avatar
FLguy
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 799
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2003 5:36 pm
Location: Daytona Beach FL
Contact:

#4 Postby FLguy » Sun Jan 04, 2004 6:29 pm

Joshua21Young wrote:So if it's already at the dateline (approx.) then when might we see its effects here in the west; then spreading throughout the rest of the US?


within the next week or there about
0 likes   

User avatar
Stephanie
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23843
Age: 63
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 9:53 am
Location: Glassboro, NJ

#5 Postby Stephanie » Sun Jan 04, 2004 6:32 pm

It looks like a bulleye! You can't miss it. I hope that the southwest does benefit from this moisture, but in the same respect, I hope we won't be hearing about more mudslides in California!
0 likes   

weatherlover427

#6 Postby weatherlover427 » Sun Jan 04, 2004 6:45 pm

Hope to see some more rain here soon! They are saying it'll warm into the upper 60s to low 70s here in 3-4 days, then all heck could cut loose after that I suppose... :o ...
0 likes   

User avatar
FLguy
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 799
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2003 5:36 pm
Location: Daytona Beach FL
Contact:

#7 Postby FLguy » Sun Jan 04, 2004 6:48 pm

Stephanie wrote:It looks like a bulleye! You can't miss it. I hope that the southwest does benefit from this moisture, but in the same respect, I hope we won't be hearing about more mudslides in California!


it all depends on how much moisture gets involved
0 likes   

User avatar
Stephanie
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23843
Age: 63
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 9:53 am
Location: Glassboro, NJ

#8 Postby Stephanie » Sun Jan 04, 2004 6:52 pm

FLguy wrote:
Stephanie wrote:It looks like a bulleye! You can't miss it. I hope that the southwest does benefit from this moisture, but in the same respect, I hope we won't be hearing about more mudslides in California!


it all depends on how much moisture gets involved


The graph that you have posted - that measures the temperature of the cloud tops right? I know that would indicate the strength of the wave, but it wouldn't necessarily determine the amount of moisture?
0 likes   

User avatar
FLguy
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 799
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2003 5:36 pm
Location: Daytona Beach FL
Contact:

#9 Postby FLguy » Sun Jan 04, 2004 7:00 pm

Stephanie wrote:
FLguy wrote:
Stephanie wrote:It looks like a bulleye! You can't miss it. I hope that the southwest does benefit from this moisture, but in the same respect, I hope we won't be hearing about more mudslides in California!


it all depends on how much moisture gets involved


The graph that you have posted - that measures the temperature of the cloud tops right? I know that would indicate the strength of the wave, but it wouldn't necessarily determine the amount of moisture?


yes it indicates the temperatures of the cloud tops. the colors(blues...yellows and reds) correspond to colder/higher cloud tops whereas the gray shading translates to lower and warmer cloud tops. the green and brown lines indicate areas of enhanced (green) and decreased (brown) moisture and convection.

areas of increased convection correspond to less outgoing longwave radiation or OLR which is depicted in the first figure of my post in blue(due to the colder cloud tops)

decreased convection corresponds more OLR...which is shown in the yellows and reds.
0 likes   

User avatar
Stephanie
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23843
Age: 63
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 9:53 am
Location: Glassboro, NJ

#10 Postby Stephanie » Sun Jan 04, 2004 7:06 pm

Thanks Flguy! I didn't know what the green/brown lines were.

If anything, there's mositure all out ahead of that wave, so we could be seeing a good soaker from it.
0 likes   

User avatar
FLguy
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 799
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2003 5:36 pm
Location: Daytona Beach FL
Contact:

#11 Postby FLguy » Sun Jan 04, 2004 7:08 pm

based on the strength of the convection and its point of origion (in the western tropical pacific)...one would have to figure that there is some very impressive amounts of moisture involved with it.
0 likes   

User avatar
FLguy
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 799
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2003 5:36 pm
Location: Daytona Beach FL
Contact:

#12 Postby FLguy » Sun Jan 04, 2004 7:09 pm

Stephanie wrote:Thanks Flguy! I didn't know what the green/brown lines were.

If anything, there's mositure all out ahead of that wave, so we could be seeing a good soaker from it.


i wouldint be so concerned with whats ahead of it...its the wave its self that has the biggest implications on the pattern downstream
0 likes   

weatherlover427

#13 Postby weatherlover427 » Sun Jan 04, 2004 7:25 pm

Next weekend could be very messy here in the West if that thing holds together ...
0 likes   

User avatar
FLguy
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 799
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2003 5:36 pm
Location: Daytona Beach FL
Contact:

#14 Postby FLguy » Sun Jan 04, 2004 8:12 pm

Heres a comparison of the location of the best convection in conjunction with heavy precipitation events along the west coast:

PAC northwest (western washington and oregon): 120E-130E

Central and northern california: 140E-160E

Southern and southwest california: 160E-170E

remember the further east the area of enhanced convection is located the further south the heaviest precipitation will occur. but at the same time the correlation between the MJO and heavy precipitation DECREASES the further south one goes along the west coast.

The figure below shows what would be the best set up for a heavy rainfall event in the PAC northwest:

Image

7-10 days before the event we notice strong blocking high pressure located in the gulf of alaska and intense PJ across the pacific extending into north america. Notice the position of the enhanced convection associated with the MJO is located just east of 120E.

by 3-5 days preceeding the event we take note of several changes...the moisture plume extends further northeast as a split flow begins to develop in the PAC jet which occurs as the block retrogrades out of the gulf of alaska and the tropical and extra tropical circulations phase with one another which causes the developing trough to draw in the sub-tropical moisture.

the precipitation event is self occurs as the deep tropical moisture plume becomes extended northward interacting with the trough off the west coast. the upper level jet them becomes directed at the pacific northwest. the low its self can become very strong and bring several days of heavy rain and mountain snows to the pacific northwest coast.
0 likes   

User avatar
FLguy
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 799
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2003 5:36 pm
Location: Daytona Beach FL
Contact:

#15 Postby FLguy » Sun Jan 04, 2004 8:19 pm

lets also remember folks...this type of set-up is most common in La Nina winters.
0 likes   

weatherlover427

#16 Postby weatherlover427 » Mon Jan 05, 2004 1:51 am

Very interesting. Thanks for the info. :)
0 likes   


Return to “Winter Weather”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests