shuttle memo warning of disaster

Chat about anything and everything... (well almost anything) Whether it be the front porch or the pot belly stove or news of interest or a topic of your liking, this is the place to post it.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
Rainband

shuttle memo warning of disaster

#1 Postby Rainband » Tue Feb 04, 2003 7:10 pm

NASA memo warned of 'potential for large damage'
Tuesday, February 4, 2003 Posted: 12:36 PM EST (1736 GMT)



The shuttle lifts off from Cape Canaveral on January 16.



HOUSTON, Texas (CNN) -- A few days before the Columbia shuttle disaster, NASA noted that debris that hit the left wing during takeoff created "the potential for a large damage area to the tile."

In an internal memo obtained by CNN, the space agency said the incident should have "no mission impact." But now, NASA says, "it may certainly be the leading candidate" in the search to explain the shuttle's breakup during re-entry Saturday.

The memo was written twelve days into Columbia's mission by the manager of the mission evaluation room (MER), where engineers monitor components of the orbiter during shuttle flights.

The memo said analyses indicate "possible localized structural damage but no burn-through, and no safety of flight issue" from the insulation that fell off an external fuel tank when Columbia blasted off.

The full memo reads:

The STS-107 mission is progressing nominally and all Orbiter subsystems are performing satisfactorily. No Orbiter issues have been reported in the previous 24 hours. The Orbiter consumables remaining are above the levels required for completion of the planned mission.

Regarding the debris hit on the left wing last discussed in the Fourth Daily Report; systems integration personnel performed a debris trajectory analysis to estimate the debris impact conditions and locations. This analysis was performed utilizing the reported observations from the ascent video and film. It was assumed that the debris was foam from the external tank.

Based on the results of the trajectory analysis, an impact analysis was performed to assess the potential damage to the tile and radial carbon carbon (RCC).

The impact analysis indicates the potential for a large damage area to the tile. Damage to the RCC should be limited to coating only and have no mission impact.

Additionally, thermal analyses were performed for different locations and damage conditions. The damage conditions included one tile missing down to the densified layer of the tile and multiple tiles missing over an area of about 7 in [inches] by 30 in.

These thermal analyses indicate possible localized structural damage but no burn-through, and no safety of flight issue.

Don L. McCormack Jr.

STS-107 Lead MER Manager
Last edited by Rainband on Wed Jan 28, 2004 8:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
mf_dolphin
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 17758
Age: 68
Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2002 2:05 pm
Location: St Petersburg, FL
Contact:

#2 Postby mf_dolphin » Tue Feb 04, 2003 7:19 pm

Old news LOL
0 likes   

Rainband

#3 Postby Rainband » Tue Feb 04, 2003 7:47 pm

Just wanted to post memo for those who were on mars for a day!!!LOL
0 likes   

ColdFront77

#4 Postby ColdFront77 » Wed Jan 28, 2004 7:07 pm

Bumping up -----> Interesting play on words with the anniversary of the Challenger Anniversary and the Mars reference.
0 likes   

Rainband

#5 Postby Rainband » Wed Jan 28, 2004 8:15 pm

That is odd considering they wanna spend money to go to mars but can't assure us of a SAFE shuttle flight. :roll: :roll: Guess I can see into the future :lol: :lol: :eek:
0 likes   

User avatar
Skywatch_NC
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10949
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 9:31 pm
Location: Raleigh, NC
Contact:

#6 Postby Skywatch_NC » Wed Jan 28, 2004 8:35 pm

There's a story by the widow of astronaut Rick Husband in the latest issue of Guideposts.

Eric
0 likes   

Rainband

#7 Postby Rainband » Wed Jan 28, 2004 8:53 pm

To guarantee we never read anymore articles like that...They need to make sure they take the needed precautions to insure the shuttle fleet is safe before we spend any money on Mars or the Moon. What good is a trip to either if we can't get our astronauts there safely. :wink:
0 likes   


Return to “Off Topic”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 59 guests